P.020 Shifts in daytime functioning items on the insomnia severity scale with lemborexant after 6 months of treatment

C. Chepke, K. Cote, K. Pinner, J. Yardley, M. Moline
{"title":"P.020 Shifts in daytime functioning items on the insomnia severity scale with lemborexant after 6 months of treatment","authors":"C. Chepke, K. Cote, K. Pinner, J. Yardley, M. Moline","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Improvements in daytime functioning ideally accompany improvements in insomnia. Scores on the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) daytime-related items were analyzed following treatment with lemborexant (LEM), a dual orexin receptor antagonist, or placebo (PBO), based on baseline severity. Methods: Participants (≥18 y) with insomnia disorder in E2006-G000-303, a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled study (first 6 months: Treatment Period 1 [TP1]), were randomized to PBO or LEM 5 mg (LEM5) or 10 mg (LEM10) for 6 months. ISI items are rated 0 (no problem) to 4 (very severe problem); daytime-related ISI items have a maximum score of 16. Results: Of 949 participants, 749 (78.9%) completed the ISI at baseline and end of TP1. Baseline daytime ISI total score distributions were similar between groups. More participants with baseline scores of 9-12 and 13-16 shifted to 0-4 with LEM5 (49.7% and 39.1%, respectively) and LEM10 (46.2% and 46.3%) versus PBO (26.6% and 29.6%). Overall shift distributions were significantly different, favoring both LEM groups (P<0.01). LEM was well tolerated. Conclusions: More LEM-treated participants had improved daytime functioning, evidenced by the significantly larger number of participants whose scores moved into lower categories (ie, better sleep) versus PBO-treated participants, demonstrating additional value beyond improved sleep parameters.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"55 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Improvements in daytime functioning ideally accompany improvements in insomnia. Scores on the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) daytime-related items were analyzed following treatment with lemborexant (LEM), a dual orexin receptor antagonist, or placebo (PBO), based on baseline severity. Methods: Participants (≥18 y) with insomnia disorder in E2006-G000-303, a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled study (first 6 months: Treatment Period 1 [TP1]), were randomized to PBO or LEM 5 mg (LEM5) or 10 mg (LEM10) for 6 months. ISI items are rated 0 (no problem) to 4 (very severe problem); daytime-related ISI items have a maximum score of 16. Results: Of 949 participants, 749 (78.9%) completed the ISI at baseline and end of TP1. Baseline daytime ISI total score distributions were similar between groups. More participants with baseline scores of 9-12 and 13-16 shifted to 0-4 with LEM5 (49.7% and 39.1%, respectively) and LEM10 (46.2% and 46.3%) versus PBO (26.6% and 29.6%). Overall shift distributions were significantly different, favoring both LEM groups (P<0.01). LEM was well tolerated. Conclusions: More LEM-treated participants had improved daytime functioning, evidenced by the significantly larger number of participants whose scores moved into lower categories (ie, better sleep) versus PBO-treated participants, demonstrating additional value beyond improved sleep parameters.
P.020 LEMBOREXANT 治疗 6 个月后失眠严重程度量表中日间功能项目的变化
背景:在改善失眠症的同时,日间功能也应得到改善。根据失眠的基线严重程度,我们分析了在接受雷博瑞坦(LEM)(一种双重奥曲肽受体拮抗剂)或安慰剂(PBO)治疗后,失眠严重程度指数(ISI)白天相关项目的得分。研究方法E2006-G000-303是一项为期12个月的随机、双盲、PBO对照研究(前6个月:治疗期1 [TP1]),患有失眠症的参与者(≥18岁)被随机分配到PBO或5毫克(LEM5)或10毫克(LEM10)的LEM治疗中,为期6个月。ISI项目分为0分(无问题)至4分(问题非常严重);与白天相关的ISI项目最高分为16分。结果:在 949 名参与者中,有 749 人(78.9%)在基线和 TP1 结束时完成了 ISI。各组的基线日间 ISI 总分分布相似。与 PBO(26.6% 和 29.6%)相比,LEM5(分别为 49.7% 和 39.1%)和 LEM10(分别为 46.2% 和 46.3%)组有更多基线分数为 9-12 分和 13-16 分的参与者转为 0-4 分。总的班次分布有明显差异,LEM 两组均占优(P<0.01)。LEM 的耐受性良好。结论与 PBO 治疗组相比,LEM 治疗组有更多参与者的日间功能得到改善,这体现在有更多参与者的评分进入较低类别(即睡眠改善),这表明除了改善睡眠参数外,LEM 还具有其他价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信