Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and Its Effect on the Flow of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As)

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Sameer M Shaikh, Debasis Patnaik, M. J. Fernandes, Sunil Kumar Ambrammal
{"title":"Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and Its Effect on the Flow of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As)","authors":"Sameer M Shaikh, Debasis Patnaik, M. J. Fernandes, Sunil Kumar Ambrammal","doi":"10.37394/23207.2024.21.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extant research finds effective intellectual property rights (IPR) protection encourages firms to initiate mergers and acquisitions (M&A) deals. IPR strengthening positively affects firms’ research and development activities and thus their innovative ability. Consequently, acquirer firms can improve their innovation quotient by pursuing target firms in regions undertaking IPR protection and enforcement measures. The present study examines the impact of IPR protection on 20,363 inbound M&A deals engaged in 42 countries between the years 2014 to 2019. Differing from the use of conventionally employed, Ginarte and Park index available in a five-yearly interval, which evaluates only Patents, this paper proxies IPR strengthening through a more comprehensive annual intellectual property (IP) index (covering other intellectual assets like copyrights, trademarks, etc. besides patents) constructed by Global Innovation Policy Center, U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Estimates from panel regression, including country and year-fixed effects, indicate that reforms that improve IP protection in a target country are positively and, to a more considerable extent, significantly associated with an increase in inbound cross-border M&As. In addition, the impact is weakly significant when target firms belong to emerging countries. This study sheds light on whether IPR protection influences corporate decision-making. The results suggest that acquirers look forward to regions undertaking efforts to improve their IP ecosystem, either to protect their intellectual capital transmitted through technology transfer or to acquire targets high on innovative quotient.","PeriodicalId":39427,"journal":{"name":"WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics","volume":"60 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2024.21.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extant research finds effective intellectual property rights (IPR) protection encourages firms to initiate mergers and acquisitions (M&A) deals. IPR strengthening positively affects firms’ research and development activities and thus their innovative ability. Consequently, acquirer firms can improve their innovation quotient by pursuing target firms in regions undertaking IPR protection and enforcement measures. The present study examines the impact of IPR protection on 20,363 inbound M&A deals engaged in 42 countries between the years 2014 to 2019. Differing from the use of conventionally employed, Ginarte and Park index available in a five-yearly interval, which evaluates only Patents, this paper proxies IPR strengthening through a more comprehensive annual intellectual property (IP) index (covering other intellectual assets like copyrights, trademarks, etc. besides patents) constructed by Global Innovation Policy Center, U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Estimates from panel regression, including country and year-fixed effects, indicate that reforms that improve IP protection in a target country are positively and, to a more considerable extent, significantly associated with an increase in inbound cross-border M&As. In addition, the impact is weakly significant when target firms belong to emerging countries. This study sheds light on whether IPR protection influences corporate decision-making. The results suggest that acquirers look forward to regions undertaking efforts to improve their IP ecosystem, either to protect their intellectual capital transmitted through technology transfer or to acquire targets high on innovative quotient.
知识产权 (IPR) 及其对跨国并购 (M&As) 流程的影响
现有研究发现,有效的知识产权(IPR)保护会鼓励企业发起并购(M&A)交易。知识产权的加强会对企业的研发活动产生积极影响,从而提高企业的创新能力。因此,收购方企业可以通过在采取知识产权保护和执行措施的地区寻找目标企业来提高其创新商数。本研究探讨了知识产权保护对 2014 年至 2019 年间 42 个国家 20,363 宗入境并购交易的影响。与传统上使用的仅评估专利的五年期 Ginarte 和 Park 指数不同,本文通过美国商会全球创新政策中心构建的更全面的年度知识产权(IP)指数(除专利外,还包括版权、商标等其他知识资产)来替代知识产权的加强。包括国家和年份固定效应在内的面板回归估计结果表明,改善目标国知识产权保护的改革与入境跨境并购的增加呈正相关,而且在更大程度上呈显著相关。此外,当目标企业属于新兴国家时,这种影响的显著性较弱。本研究揭示了知识产权保护是否会影响企业决策。研究结果表明,收购方希望各地区努力改善其知识产权生态系统,以保护其通过技术转让传播的知识资本,或收购创新商数高的目标企业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics
WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
180
期刊介绍: WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics publishes original research papers relating to the global economy. We aim to bring important work using any economic approach to a wide international audience and therefore only publish papers of exceptional scientific value that advance our understanding of finances. The research presented must transcend the limits of case studies, while both experimental and theoretical studies are accepted. While its main emphasis is economic, it is a multi-disciplinary journal and therefore its content mirrors the diverse interests and approaches of scholars involved with the international dimensions of business, economics, finance, history, law, marketing, management, political science, and related areas. It also welcomes scholarly contributions from officials with government agencies, international agencies, and non-governmental organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信