Evaluation of health risk experienced by urban taxi drivers to whole-body vibration and multiple shocks

Ali Salehi Sahlabadi, Keykāvus Azrah, Younes Mehrifar, Mohsen Poursadeghiyan
{"title":"Evaluation of health risk experienced by urban taxi drivers to whole-body vibration and multiple shocks","authors":"Ali Salehi Sahlabadi, Keykāvus Azrah, Younes Mehrifar, Mohsen Poursadeghiyan","doi":"10.1177/09574565241252992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This cross-sectional study was done aiming at determining the exposure of taxi drivers to vibration on 35 safe taxis (19 cars with engine volume of 1.325 L, 9 cars with engine volume of 1.645 L, and 7 cars with engine volume of 1.761 L). Measurements were based on ‘ISO 2631-1’ on seats’ pans, by Castel GA2005 vibrometer. The results through two different evaluative methods indicated moderate exposure levels, corresponding to suggestive Health Guidance Caution Zone (HGCZ) in ‘ISO 2631-1’. Evaluation of exposure to the WBV among taxi drivers, in the taxis with low and high mean acceleration values, using the VDV method is preferred over the R.M.S method. In lower accelerations, in all conditions, the mean of the reckoned values in the VDV method was less than the R.M.S method, and in higher accelerations, where there are more differences, and the CF values were higher (PAIK 1761 cars), again the assessed mean duration in the VDV method is less than R.M.S method. In higher accelerations and with fewer crest factors, this matter didn’t hold, and the allowed time in the R.M.S method became lower.","PeriodicalId":508830,"journal":{"name":"Noise & Vibration Worldwide","volume":"8 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noise & Vibration Worldwide","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09574565241252992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This cross-sectional study was done aiming at determining the exposure of taxi drivers to vibration on 35 safe taxis (19 cars with engine volume of 1.325 L, 9 cars with engine volume of 1.645 L, and 7 cars with engine volume of 1.761 L). Measurements were based on ‘ISO 2631-1’ on seats’ pans, by Castel GA2005 vibrometer. The results through two different evaluative methods indicated moderate exposure levels, corresponding to suggestive Health Guidance Caution Zone (HGCZ) in ‘ISO 2631-1’. Evaluation of exposure to the WBV among taxi drivers, in the taxis with low and high mean acceleration values, using the VDV method is preferred over the R.M.S method. In lower accelerations, in all conditions, the mean of the reckoned values in the VDV method was less than the R.M.S method, and in higher accelerations, where there are more differences, and the CF values were higher (PAIK 1761 cars), again the assessed mean duration in the VDV method is less than R.M.S method. In higher accelerations and with fewer crest factors, this matter didn’t hold, and the allowed time in the R.M.S method became lower.
评估城市出租车司机在全身振动和多重冲击下的健康风险
这项横断面研究旨在确定出租车司机在 35 辆安全出租车(19 辆车的发动机排量为 1.325 升,9 辆车的发动机排量为 1.645 升,7 辆车的发动机排量为 1.761 升)上受到的振动。根据 "ISO 2631-1 "标准,使用 Castel GA2005 测振仪对座椅盘进行测量。通过两种不同的评估方法得出的结果表明,暴露水平适中,与 "ISO 2631-1 "中的提示性健康指导警戒区(HGCZ)相对应。在平均加速度值较低和较高的出租车中,使用 VDV 方法比 R.M.S 方法更适合评估出租车司机暴露于 WBV 的情况。在加速度较低的情况下,在所有条件下,VDV 法计算值的平均值都小于 R.M.S 法,而在加速度较高的情况下,差异更大,CF 值更高(PAIK 1761 车),VDV 法评估的平均持续时间也小于 R.M.S 法。在加速度较高、波峰因数较少的情况下,这个问题并不成立,R.M.S 方法的允许时间变得更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信