Our gloomy future and glorious past: societal discontent, national nostalgia and support for populist radical-right parties in the Netherlands

A. Smeekes, Marcel Lubbers
{"title":"Our gloomy future and glorious past: societal discontent, national nostalgia and support for populist radical-right parties in the Netherlands","authors":"A. Smeekes, Marcel Lubbers","doi":"10.3389/fpos.2024.1390662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political campaign slogans, such as “Make America Great Again” or “The Netherlands Ours Again,” indicate that right-wing populists in Western countries use nostalgia to depict the national past as glorious. At the same time, populist radical-right parties (PRRP) portray this glorious past as being in stark contrast with the gloomy present of their country, which is portrayed as being in a state of decline. This suggests that PRRP in Western societies draw on both societal discontent (i.e., the belief that society is in decline and poorly functioning) and national nostalgia (i.e., a longing for the good old days of the country) to mobilize their voters. Although there is a burgeoning literature on reasons for PRRP electoral support, fewer studies have focused on its emotional or affective underpinnings. While scholars have proposed that both societal discontent and national nostalgia are an integral piece of a new master-frame employed by PRRP in Western countries to increase their electoral appeal, these elements have hardly been empirically studied in reference to voters. Relying on an integration of research in political science and social psychology, we hypothesized that both societal discontent and national nostalgia go together with a greater sympathy, and likelihood of voting, for PRRP. In addition, we predicted that national nostalgia is an explanatory mechanism that links societal discontent to more support for PRRP. These hypotheses were tested in the context of the Netherlands, among a representative sample of native Dutch voters, using the Dutch Parliamentary Elections Study of 2021. Results demonstrated that while both societal discontent and national nostalgia were relevant predictors of PRRP support, there was no strong evidence for national nostalgia as an explanatory mechanism of the link between societal discontent and PRRP support.","PeriodicalId":502753,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Political Science","volume":"8 36","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1390662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Political campaign slogans, such as “Make America Great Again” or “The Netherlands Ours Again,” indicate that right-wing populists in Western countries use nostalgia to depict the national past as glorious. At the same time, populist radical-right parties (PRRP) portray this glorious past as being in stark contrast with the gloomy present of their country, which is portrayed as being in a state of decline. This suggests that PRRP in Western societies draw on both societal discontent (i.e., the belief that society is in decline and poorly functioning) and national nostalgia (i.e., a longing for the good old days of the country) to mobilize their voters. Although there is a burgeoning literature on reasons for PRRP electoral support, fewer studies have focused on its emotional or affective underpinnings. While scholars have proposed that both societal discontent and national nostalgia are an integral piece of a new master-frame employed by PRRP in Western countries to increase their electoral appeal, these elements have hardly been empirically studied in reference to voters. Relying on an integration of research in political science and social psychology, we hypothesized that both societal discontent and national nostalgia go together with a greater sympathy, and likelihood of voting, for PRRP. In addition, we predicted that national nostalgia is an explanatory mechanism that links societal discontent to more support for PRRP. These hypotheses were tested in the context of the Netherlands, among a representative sample of native Dutch voters, using the Dutch Parliamentary Elections Study of 2021. Results demonstrated that while both societal discontent and national nostalgia were relevant predictors of PRRP support, there was no strong evidence for national nostalgia as an explanatory mechanism of the link between societal discontent and PRRP support.
我们黯淡的未来和辉煌的过去:荷兰的社会不满情绪、民族怀旧情绪和对民粹激进右翼政党的支持
让美国再次伟大 "或 "荷兰再次属于我们 "等政治竞选口号表明,西方国家的右翼民粹主义者利用怀旧情绪将国家的过去描绘成辉煌的。与此同时,激进右翼民粹主义政党(PRRP)将这一光荣的过去与他们国家的黯淡现状形成鲜明对比,后者被描绘成处于衰落状态。这表明,西方社会的激进右翼政党既利用社会不满情绪(即认为社会衰落、运转不畅),又利用民族怀旧情绪(即对国家过去美好时光的向往)来动员选民。尽管有关人民重建计划选举支持原因的文献不断涌现,但关注其情感或情绪基础的研究却较少。虽然有学者提出,社会不满情绪和民族怀旧情绪是西方国家人民改革党为提高选举吸引力而采用的新总体框架中不可或缺的一部分,但这些因素几乎没有针对选民进行过实证研究。综合政治学和社会心理学的研究,我们假设社会不满情绪和民族怀旧情绪会同时增加对人民改革党的同情,并增加投票的可能性。此外,我们还预测,民族怀旧情绪是一种解释机制,它将社会不满情绪与对减贫战略规划的更多支持联系在一起。我们利用 2021 年荷兰议会选举研究(Dutch Parliamentary Elections Study of 2021),在荷兰本土选民的代表性样本中对上述假设进行了检验。结果表明,虽然社会不满情绪和民族怀旧情绪都是预测减贫党支持率的相关因素,但没有强有力的证据表明民族怀旧情绪是社会不满情绪与减贫党支持率之间联系的解释机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信