Life cycle thinking and carbon accounting in sustainable supply chains: a structured literature review and research agenda

IF 5.2 4区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Elisa Truant, Edoardo Crocco, Laura Corazza, Edoardo Borlatto
{"title":"Life cycle thinking and carbon accounting in sustainable supply chains: a structured literature review and research agenda","authors":"Elisa Truant, Edoardo Crocco, Laura Corazza, Edoardo Borlatto","doi":"10.1108/sampj-09-2023-0708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThis study aims to holistically explore the intersection of sustainable supply chain management, carbon accounting and life cycle assessment (LCA). The purpose of this study is to derive state-of-the-art knowledge of this landscape and use it to build a structured research agenda that can help to further develop this field.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nSeventy-eight distinct contributions, identified through a rigorous, transparent and replicable search protocol, are analyzed through a systematic literature review. Additionally, bibliometric information on the studies is extracted from the Scopus database and visualized through the use of VOSViewer and RStudio.\n\nFindings\nThis study outlines the current state-of-the-art knowledge across three spheres of supply chain management, synthesizing the extant literature into several nascent themes – namely, the significance of Scope 3 emissions; how LCA can be integrated into carbon accounting and sustainability disclosures, the differences between countries and industries in terms of carbon emissions and policies for a concerted effort toward carbon reduction.\n\nPractical implications\nSeveral practical implications can be drawn from the research for both practitioners and policymakers. The research provides a comprehensive, bird’s eye view on the discrepancies between different industries and countries in terms of carbon emissions, along with how carbon accounting should move toward strategic and predictive adoption.\n\nSocial implications\nThe results show that adopting life cycle thinking can contribute to more transparent monitoring of carbon emissions in supply chains; however, its use in sustainability reporting needs to become more widespread, encompassing not only the carbon footprints of products and services but also the organization as a whole.\n\nOriginality/value\nUsing bibliographic and critical qualitative analyses, this study reviews the literature on LCA in sustainable supply chain management and carbon accounting. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this review is the first attempt to synthesize this relevant and rapidly growing nexus between the three literature streams mentioned above.\n","PeriodicalId":22143,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-09-2023-0708","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to holistically explore the intersection of sustainable supply chain management, carbon accounting and life cycle assessment (LCA). The purpose of this study is to derive state-of-the-art knowledge of this landscape and use it to build a structured research agenda that can help to further develop this field. Design/methodology/approach Seventy-eight distinct contributions, identified through a rigorous, transparent and replicable search protocol, are analyzed through a systematic literature review. Additionally, bibliometric information on the studies is extracted from the Scopus database and visualized through the use of VOSViewer and RStudio. Findings This study outlines the current state-of-the-art knowledge across three spheres of supply chain management, synthesizing the extant literature into several nascent themes – namely, the significance of Scope 3 emissions; how LCA can be integrated into carbon accounting and sustainability disclosures, the differences between countries and industries in terms of carbon emissions and policies for a concerted effort toward carbon reduction. Practical implications Several practical implications can be drawn from the research for both practitioners and policymakers. The research provides a comprehensive, bird’s eye view on the discrepancies between different industries and countries in terms of carbon emissions, along with how carbon accounting should move toward strategic and predictive adoption. Social implications The results show that adopting life cycle thinking can contribute to more transparent monitoring of carbon emissions in supply chains; however, its use in sustainability reporting needs to become more widespread, encompassing not only the carbon footprints of products and services but also the organization as a whole. Originality/value Using bibliographic and critical qualitative analyses, this study reviews the literature on LCA in sustainable supply chain management and carbon accounting. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this review is the first attempt to synthesize this relevant and rapidly growing nexus between the three literature streams mentioned above.
可持续供应链中的生命周期思维和碳核算:结构化文献综述和研究议程
目的本研究旨在全面探讨可持续供应链管理、碳核算和生命周期评估(LCA)的交叉点。设计/方法/途径通过严格、透明和可复制的搜索协议确定了 78 篇不同的文献,并通过系统的文献综述对其进行了分析。此外,还从 Scopus 数据库中提取了有关研究的文献计量信息,并通过使用 VOSViewer 和 RStudio 进行了可视化。研究结果本研究概述了当前供应链管理三个领域的最新知识,将现有文献归纳为几个新的主题,即范围 3 排放的重要性、如何将生命周期评估纳入碳核算和可持续发展披露、不同国家和行业在碳排放方面的差异以及共同努力减少碳排放的政策。这项研究提供了一个全面的、鸟瞰式的视角,让我们了解不同行业和国家在碳排放方面的差异,以及碳核算应如何朝着战略性和预测性的方向发展。社会影响研究结果表明,采用生命周期思维有助于对供应链中的碳排放进行更透明的监控;但是,生命周期思维在可持续发展报告中的应用还需要更加广泛,不仅要包括产品和服务的碳足迹,还要包括整个组织。 原创性/价值本研究通过书目分析和批判性定性分析,对可持续供应链管理和碳核算中的生命周期评估文献进行了回顾。据作者所知,本综述是首次尝试综合上述三种文献流之间这一相关且快速发展的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信