Population-wide impact of a pragmatic program to identify and manage individuals at high-risk of cardiovascular disease: a cluster randomized trial in 120 villages from Northern China

Siyu Chen, Lijing L. Yan, Xiangxian Feng, Jianxin Zhang, Yuhong Zhang, Ruijuan Zhang, Bo Zhou, Yangfeng Wu
{"title":"Population-wide impact of a pragmatic program to identify and manage individuals at high-risk of cardiovascular disease: a cluster randomized trial in 120 villages from Northern China","authors":"Siyu Chen, Lijing L. Yan, Xiangxian Feng, Jianxin Zhang, Yuhong Zhang, Ruijuan Zhang, Bo Zhou, Yangfeng Wu","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1372298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To explore the population-wide impacts of an evidence-based high-risk strategy for prevention of cardiovascular diseases in resource-poor populations.A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted among 120 villages in rural China, with 60 on intervention and 60 on usual care as controls, for 2 years. The intervention emphasized training village doctors to identify high-risk individuals and administering standardized treatments focusing on hypertension management. A random sample of 20 men aged ≥50 years and 20 women aged ≥60 years was drawn from each village before randomization for the baseline survey, and another independent random sample with the same age and sex distribution was drawn at 2 years for the post-intervention survey. The primary outcome was the population mean systolic blood pressure (SBP). Secondary outcomes included the proportions of patients who received regular primary care, antihypertensive medications, aspirin, or lifestyle advice.A total of 5,654 high cardiovascular risk individuals were identified and managed by village doctors in intervention villages for 15 months on average, with mean SBP lowered by 19.8 mmHg and the proportion with blood pressure under control increased from 22.1% to 72.7%. The primary analysis of the two independent samples (5,050 and 4,887 participants each) showed that population-wide mean SBP in intervention villages did not differ from that in control villages at 2 years (mean difference = 1.0 mmHg, 95% CI: −2.19, 4.26; P = 0.528), though almost all secondary outcomes concerning primary care indicators significantly increased in intervention villages.In our study, the pragmatic cardiovascular risk management program targeting on high-risk individuals significantly improved the quality of primary care. However, its impact on population blood pressure level and the burden of hypertension-related diseases appeared very limited.\nClinicalTrial.gov identifier, NCT01259700.","PeriodicalId":510752,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"13 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1372298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explore the population-wide impacts of an evidence-based high-risk strategy for prevention of cardiovascular diseases in resource-poor populations.A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted among 120 villages in rural China, with 60 on intervention and 60 on usual care as controls, for 2 years. The intervention emphasized training village doctors to identify high-risk individuals and administering standardized treatments focusing on hypertension management. A random sample of 20 men aged ≥50 years and 20 women aged ≥60 years was drawn from each village before randomization for the baseline survey, and another independent random sample with the same age and sex distribution was drawn at 2 years for the post-intervention survey. The primary outcome was the population mean systolic blood pressure (SBP). Secondary outcomes included the proportions of patients who received regular primary care, antihypertensive medications, aspirin, or lifestyle advice.A total of 5,654 high cardiovascular risk individuals were identified and managed by village doctors in intervention villages for 15 months on average, with mean SBP lowered by 19.8 mmHg and the proportion with blood pressure under control increased from 22.1% to 72.7%. The primary analysis of the two independent samples (5,050 and 4,887 participants each) showed that population-wide mean SBP in intervention villages did not differ from that in control villages at 2 years (mean difference = 1.0 mmHg, 95% CI: −2.19, 4.26; P = 0.528), though almost all secondary outcomes concerning primary care indicators significantly increased in intervention villages.In our study, the pragmatic cardiovascular risk management program targeting on high-risk individuals significantly improved the quality of primary care. However, its impact on population blood pressure level and the burden of hypertension-related diseases appeared very limited. ClinicalTrial.gov identifier, NCT01259700.
一项旨在识别和管理心血管疾病高危人群的实用计划对整个人群的影响:在中国北方 120 个村庄开展的分组随机试验
在中国农村的 120 个村庄中开展了一项分组随机对照试验,60 个村庄接受干预,60 个村庄接受常规治疗,为期 2 年。干预措施强调培训乡村医生识别高危人群,并实施以高血压管理为重点的标准化治疗。每个村随机抽取 20 名年龄≥50 岁的男性和 20 名年龄≥60 岁的女性,进行基线调查,并在 2 年后抽取另一个具有相同年龄和性别分布的独立随机样本,进行干预后调查。主要结果是人群平均收缩压(SBP)。共有 5654 名心血管疾病高危人群被识别出来,并由干预村的村医进行了平均 15 个月的管理,平均收缩压降低了 19.8 mmHg,血压得到控制的比例从 22.1%上升到 72.7%。对两个独立样本(各有 5,050 和 4,887 名参与者)进行的主要分析表明,2 年后,干预村的全人口平均 SBP 与对照村相比没有差异(平均差异 = 1.0 mmHg,95% CI:-2.19,4.26;P = 0.528),但几乎所有与初级保健指标相关的次要结果在干预村都有显著增加。在我们的研究中,针对高危人群的务实性心血管风险管理计划大大提高了初级保健的质量,但其对人群血压水平和高血压相关疾病负担的影响似乎非常有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信