P.074 Assessing the emergence and evolution of artificial intelligence and machine learning research in neuroradiology

SS Haile, A Boutet, AZ Wang, H. Son, M Malik, V Pai, M Nasralla, J. Germann, A. Vetkas, F. Khalvati, BB Ertl-Wagner
{"title":"P.074 Assessing the emergence and evolution of artificial intelligence and machine learning research in neuroradiology","authors":"SS Haile, A Boutet, AZ Wang, H. Son, M Malik, V Pai, M Nasralla, J. Germann, A. Vetkas, F. Khalvati, BB Ertl-Wagner","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has been growing in neuroradiology, but there is limited knowledge on how this interest has manifested into research and the field’s trends, challenges, and future directions. Methods: The American Journal of Neuroradiology was queried for original research articles published since inception (Jan. 1, 1980) to Sept. 19, 2022 that contained any of the following key terms: “machine learning”, “artificial intelligence”, or “radiomics”. Articles were screened, categorized into Statistical Modelling (Type 1), AI/ML Development (Type 2), or End-user Application (Type 3) and then bibliometrically analyzed. Results: A total of 124 articles were identified with 85% being non-integration focused (Type 1 n = 41, Type 2 n = 65) and the remaining (n = 18) being Type 3. The total number of articles published grew two-fold in the last five years, with Type 2 articles mainly driving this growth. While most (66%) Type 2 articles were led by a radiologist with 55% possessing a postgraduate degree, a minority of Type 2 articles addressed bias (15%) and explainability (20%). Conclusions: The results of this study highlight areas for improvement but also strengths that stakeholders can consider when promoting the shift towards integrating practical AI/ML solutions in neuroradiology.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has been growing in neuroradiology, but there is limited knowledge on how this interest has manifested into research and the field’s trends, challenges, and future directions. Methods: The American Journal of Neuroradiology was queried for original research articles published since inception (Jan. 1, 1980) to Sept. 19, 2022 that contained any of the following key terms: “machine learning”, “artificial intelligence”, or “radiomics”. Articles were screened, categorized into Statistical Modelling (Type 1), AI/ML Development (Type 2), or End-user Application (Type 3) and then bibliometrically analyzed. Results: A total of 124 articles were identified with 85% being non-integration focused (Type 1 n = 41, Type 2 n = 65) and the remaining (n = 18) being Type 3. The total number of articles published grew two-fold in the last five years, with Type 2 articles mainly driving this growth. While most (66%) Type 2 articles were led by a radiologist with 55% possessing a postgraduate degree, a minority of Type 2 articles addressed bias (15%) and explainability (20%). Conclusions: The results of this study highlight areas for improvement but also strengths that stakeholders can consider when promoting the shift towards integrating practical AI/ML solutions in neuroradiology.
P.074 评估神经放射学中人工智能和机器学习研究的出现与发展
背景:神经放射学领域对人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)的兴趣与日俱增,但对这一兴趣如何体现在研究中以及该领域的趋势、挑战和未来方向的了解却十分有限。研究方法查询《美国神经放射学杂志》自创刊(1980 年 1 月 1 日)至 2022 年 9 月 19 日期间发表的包含以下关键术语的原创研究文章:"机器学习"、"人工智能 "或 "放射组学"。文章经过筛选,分为统计建模(类型 1)、人工智能/ML 开发(类型 2)或最终用户应用(类型 3),然后进行文献计量学分析。结果:共确定了 124 篇文章,其中 85% 是非以集成为重点(类型 1 n = 41,类型 2 n = 65),其余(n = 18)为类型 3。在过去五年中,发表的文章总数增长了两倍,其中主要是第二类文章推动了这一增长。大多数(66%)第 2 类文章由放射科医生撰写,其中 55% 拥有研究生学位,少数第 2 类文章涉及偏见(15%)和可解释性(20%)问题。结论:本研究的结果强调了需要改进的方面,但同时也指出了相关人员在促进神经放射学向整合实用人工智能/ML 解决方案转变时可以考虑的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信