Going Local: An Agency-Based Approach to Collapse, Resistance, and Resilience in Hittite Anatolia

IF 0.3
N. İlgi Gerçek
{"title":"Going Local: An Agency-Based Approach to Collapse, Resistance, and Resilience in Hittite Anatolia","authors":"N. İlgi Gerçek","doi":"10.1515/janeh-2023-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Crisis and collapse have long been prominent themes in Hittite studies (much more so than the related topics of resistance and resilience) and most of the extant body of scholarship on these themes have concentrated on the disintegration of the Hittite Empire around 1200 BCE. Though the events, conditions and processes that culminated in the disintegration of the Hittite Empire elude historical reconstruction, recent studies have unanimously rejected monocausal explanations of collapse in favor of the view that it was brought about by a combination of factors – internal, external, acute or chronic. In Hittite scholarship, the study of collapse and its aftermath have typically operated within a markedly state-centered and progressivist framework, focusing primarily on figuring out “what went wrong.” Meanwhile, especially in text-based studies, the agency and resilience of local, small(er)-scale, peripheral, and non-state individuals and communities, as well as their role in the construction, maintenance, and collapse of the Hittite empire, remain largely overlooked. The aim of the present paper is to shift the focus and scale of analysis away from the state, and to draw out from the textual record, the long-term agency, resistance, and resilience of local, small-scale, and often non-state individuals, communities, or socio-political institutions, which have typically been left out of text-based modern narratives. This paper will reassess the prominent view of the Hittite king (and state) as the absolute political, military, judicial, and religious authority, and argue that certain local and non-state communities and socio-political institutions exercised diverse kinds of agency, were remarkably resilient in the long term, and survived the final collapse of the Hittite state. In order to situate the inquiry in its broader scholarly and intellectual context, it will begin with an overview of where things stand in the study of the Hittite collapse. The next step will be to identify individual or collective local actors in the textual record. It will lastly focus on the interactions of diverse local agents with the Hittite state.","PeriodicalId":174647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History","volume":"5 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/janeh-2023-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crisis and collapse have long been prominent themes in Hittite studies (much more so than the related topics of resistance and resilience) and most of the extant body of scholarship on these themes have concentrated on the disintegration of the Hittite Empire around 1200 BCE. Though the events, conditions and processes that culminated in the disintegration of the Hittite Empire elude historical reconstruction, recent studies have unanimously rejected monocausal explanations of collapse in favor of the view that it was brought about by a combination of factors – internal, external, acute or chronic. In Hittite scholarship, the study of collapse and its aftermath have typically operated within a markedly state-centered and progressivist framework, focusing primarily on figuring out “what went wrong.” Meanwhile, especially in text-based studies, the agency and resilience of local, small(er)-scale, peripheral, and non-state individuals and communities, as well as their role in the construction, maintenance, and collapse of the Hittite empire, remain largely overlooked. The aim of the present paper is to shift the focus and scale of analysis away from the state, and to draw out from the textual record, the long-term agency, resistance, and resilience of local, small-scale, and often non-state individuals, communities, or socio-political institutions, which have typically been left out of text-based modern narratives. This paper will reassess the prominent view of the Hittite king (and state) as the absolute political, military, judicial, and religious authority, and argue that certain local and non-state communities and socio-political institutions exercised diverse kinds of agency, were remarkably resilient in the long term, and survived the final collapse of the Hittite state. In order to situate the inquiry in its broader scholarly and intellectual context, it will begin with an overview of where things stand in the study of the Hittite collapse. The next step will be to identify individual or collective local actors in the textual record. It will lastly focus on the interactions of diverse local agents with the Hittite state.
走向地方:以机构为基础研究赫梯安纳托利亚的崩溃、抵抗和复原力
长期以来,危机和崩溃一直是赫梯研究中的突出主题(比相关的抵抗和复原力主题更突出),关于这些主题的现存学术研究大多集中于公元前 1200 年左右赫梯帝国的解体。虽然最终导致赫梯帝国解体的事件、条件和过程无法进行历史还原,但近期的研究一致反对对崩溃进行单一原因的解释,而倾向于认为崩溃是由内部、外部、急性或慢性等多种因素共同造成的。在赫梯学术研究中,对崩溃及其后果的研究通常是在一个明显以国家为中心和进步主义的框架内进行的,主要侧重于找出 "哪里出了问题"。与此同时,尤其是在基于文本的研究中,地方、小规模、边缘和非国家的个人和社区的能动性和复原力,以及他们在赫梯帝国的建设、维持和崩溃中所扮演的角色,在很大程度上仍然被忽视。本文旨在将分析的重点和范围从国家转移开,并从文本记录中汲取地方、小规模、通常是非国家的个人、社区或社会政治机构的长期能动性、抵抗力和复原力,这些通常被排除在基于文本的现代叙事之外。本文将重新评估赫梯国王(和国家)作为绝对的政治、军事、司法和宗教权威的突出观点,并论证某些地方和非国家社区及社会政治机构行使了多种代理权,具有非凡的长期复原力,并在赫梯国家的最终崩溃中幸存下来。为了将这项研究置于更广泛的学术和知识背景中,我们将首先概述赫梯崩溃研究的现状。下一步将从文本记录中找出当地的个人或集体行为者。最后将重点探讨不同的地方参与者与赫梯国家之间的互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书