P.116 Days at home after traumatic brain injury: moving beyond mortality to evaluate patient-centered outcomes using population health data

AK Malhotra, AB Nathens, H. Shakil, RH Jaffe, A. Essa, F. Mathieu, J. Badhiwala, K. Thorpe, AV Kulkarni, CD Witiw, JR Wilson
{"title":"P.116 Days at home after traumatic brain injury: moving beyond mortality to evaluate patient-centered outcomes using population health data","authors":"AK Malhotra, AB Nathens, H. Shakil, RH Jaffe, A. Essa, F. Mathieu, J. Badhiwala, K. Thorpe, AV Kulkarni, CD Witiw, JR Wilson","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite the utility of administrative health data, there remains a lack of patient-centered outcome measures to meaningfully capture morbidity after traumatic brain injury (TBI). We sought to characterize and validate days at home (DAH) as a feasible measure to assess population-level moderate to severe TBI (msTBI) outcomes and health resource utilization. Methods: We utilized linked health administrative data sources to identify adults with msTBI patients presenting to trauma centers in Ontario injured between 2009-2021. DAH at 180 days reflects the total number of days spent alive and at home excluding the days spent institutionalized in acute care, rehabilitation, inpatient mental health settings or post-acute readmissions. Construct and predictive validity were determined; we additionally estimated minimally important difference (MID) in DAH180days. Results: There were 6340 patients that met inclusion criteria. Median DAH180days were 70 days (interquartile range 0-144). Increased health resource utilization at baseline, older age, increasing cranial injury severity and major extracranial injuries were significantly associated with fewer DAH180days. DAH180days was correlated to DAH counts at 1-3 years. The average MID estimate from anchor-based and distribution-based methods was 18 days. Conclusions: We introduce DAH180days as a feasible and sufficiently responsive patient-centered outcome measure with construct, predictive and face validity in an msTBI population.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"1 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the utility of administrative health data, there remains a lack of patient-centered outcome measures to meaningfully capture morbidity after traumatic brain injury (TBI). We sought to characterize and validate days at home (DAH) as a feasible measure to assess population-level moderate to severe TBI (msTBI) outcomes and health resource utilization. Methods: We utilized linked health administrative data sources to identify adults with msTBI patients presenting to trauma centers in Ontario injured between 2009-2021. DAH at 180 days reflects the total number of days spent alive and at home excluding the days spent institutionalized in acute care, rehabilitation, inpatient mental health settings or post-acute readmissions. Construct and predictive validity were determined; we additionally estimated minimally important difference (MID) in DAH180days. Results: There were 6340 patients that met inclusion criteria. Median DAH180days were 70 days (interquartile range 0-144). Increased health resource utilization at baseline, older age, increasing cranial injury severity and major extracranial injuries were significantly associated with fewer DAH180days. DAH180days was correlated to DAH counts at 1-3 years. The average MID estimate from anchor-based and distribution-based methods was 18 days. Conclusions: We introduce DAH180days as a feasible and sufficiently responsive patient-centered outcome measure with construct, predictive and face validity in an msTBI population.
P.116 脑外伤后在家的日子:超越死亡率,利用人口健康数据评估以患者为中心的结果
背景:尽管健康管理数据非常有用,但仍然缺乏以患者为中心的结果测量方法来有意义地反映创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的发病率。我们试图对在家天数(DAH)进行特征描述和验证,将其作为评估人群中度至重度创伤性脑损伤(msTBI)结果和医疗资源利用率的可行指标。方法:我们利用关联的健康管理数据源来识别 2009-2021 年间前往安大略省创伤中心就诊的中重度创伤性脑损伤(msTBI)成人患者。180 天的 DAH 反映了患者在家中存活的总天数,但不包括在急症护理、康复、住院精神疾病治疗机构或急性期后再入院治疗的天数。我们还估算了DAH180天的最小重要差异(MID)。结果共有 6340 名患者符合纳入标准。DAH180天的中位数为70天(四分位距为0-144)。基线医疗资源利用率增加、年龄增大、颅脑损伤严重程度增加和主要颅外损伤与 DAH180 天数减少显著相关。DAH180天与1-3年的DAH计数相关。基于锚的方法和基于分布的方法估计的平均 MID 为 18 天。结论:我们介绍的 DAH180 天是一种以患者为中心的可行结果测量方法,在毫秒创伤性脑损伤人群中具有构造、预测和表面有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信