P.045 Trofinetide for the treatment of Rett syndrome: long-term safety and efficacy results from the open-label LILAC and LILAC-2 studies

AK Percy, JL Neul, TA Benke, EM Berry-Kravis, DG Glaze, ED Marsh, A. Lamontagne, D. An, KM Bishop, JM Youakim
{"title":"P.045 Trofinetide for the treatment of Rett syndrome: long-term safety and efficacy results from the open-label LILAC and LILAC-2 studies","authors":"AK Percy, JL Neul, TA Benke, EM Berry-Kravis, DG Glaze, ED Marsh, A. Lamontagne, D. An, KM Bishop, JM Youakim","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Trofinetide significantly improved core symptoms of Rett syndrome (RTT) with an acceptable safety profile in LAVENDER. Here, we report the safety and efficacy results of LILAC and LILAC-2, open-label extension studies of LAVENDER. Methods: Females with RTT, aged 5–21 years, received twice-daily, oral trofinetide in LILAC for 40 weeks. Participants who completed LAVENDER and LILAC continued trofinetide in LILAC-2, a 32-month extension study. Safety assessments included the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Efficacy endpoints included the Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ) and the Clinical Global Impression–Improvement (CGI-I) scale. Results: Overall, 154 patients were enrolled in LILAC. The most common AEs were diarrhea (74.7%) and vomiting (28.6%). The mean (standard error [SE]) change from the LAVENDER baseline to Week 40 in the LILAC study in RSBQ was -7.3 (1.62) and -7.0 (1.61) for participants treated with trofinetide and placebo in LAVENDER, respectively. Mean (SE) CGI-I scores compared with the LILAC baseline at Week 40 were 3.1 (0.11) and 3.2 (0.14) for patients treated with trofinetide and placebo in LAVENDER, respectively. Similar safety and efficacy trends were observed in LILAC-2. Conclusions: Trofinetide continued to improve symptoms of RTT in LILAC and LILAC-2 with a safety profile consistent with LAVENDER.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"7 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trofinetide significantly improved core symptoms of Rett syndrome (RTT) with an acceptable safety profile in LAVENDER. Here, we report the safety and efficacy results of LILAC and LILAC-2, open-label extension studies of LAVENDER. Methods: Females with RTT, aged 5–21 years, received twice-daily, oral trofinetide in LILAC for 40 weeks. Participants who completed LAVENDER and LILAC continued trofinetide in LILAC-2, a 32-month extension study. Safety assessments included the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Efficacy endpoints included the Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ) and the Clinical Global Impression–Improvement (CGI-I) scale. Results: Overall, 154 patients were enrolled in LILAC. The most common AEs were diarrhea (74.7%) and vomiting (28.6%). The mean (standard error [SE]) change from the LAVENDER baseline to Week 40 in the LILAC study in RSBQ was -7.3 (1.62) and -7.0 (1.61) for participants treated with trofinetide and placebo in LAVENDER, respectively. Mean (SE) CGI-I scores compared with the LILAC baseline at Week 40 were 3.1 (0.11) and 3.2 (0.14) for patients treated with trofinetide and placebo in LAVENDER, respectively. Similar safety and efficacy trends were observed in LILAC-2. Conclusions: Trofinetide continued to improve symptoms of RTT in LILAC and LILAC-2 with a safety profile consistent with LAVENDER.
P.045 治疗雷特综合征的曲非奈德:开放标签 LILAC 和 LILAC-2 研究的长期安全性和有效性结果
研究背景在LAVENDER研究中,曲非奈德明显改善了雷特综合征(RTT)的核心症状,且安全性可接受。在此,我们报告 LILAC 和 LILAC-2 的安全性和疗效结果,这两项研究是 LAVENDER 的开放标签扩展研究。研究方法年龄在 5-21 岁的女性 RTT 患者在 LILAC 中接受了为期 40 周的每日两次口服特罗芬太尼治疗。完成 LAVENDER 和 LILAC 研究的参与者在为期 32 个月的 LILAC-2 扩展研究中继续服用特罗菲肽。安全性评估包括不良事件(AE)的发生率。疗效终点包括雷特综合征行为问卷(RSBQ)和临床总体印象改善量表(CGI-I)。结果LILAC共招募了154名患者。最常见的不良反应是腹泻(74.7%)和呕吐(28.6%)。在LILAC研究中,从LAVENDER基线到第40周的RSBQ平均变化(标准误差[SE])分别为-7.3(1.62)和-7.0(1.61);在LAVENDER研究中,接受特罗芬肽治疗的患者和接受安慰剂治疗的患者的RSBQ平均变化(标准误差[SE])分别为-7.3(1.62)和-7.0(1.61)。在第40周时,与LILAC基线相比,接受特罗芬肽治疗的患者和接受安慰剂治疗的患者的CGI-I评分平均值(SE)分别为3.1(0.11)和3.2(0.14)。在 LILAC-2 中也观察到了类似的安全性和疗效趋势。结论在 LILAC 和 LILAC-2 中,特罗菲奈肽继续改善了 RTT 的症状,其安全性与 LAVENDER 一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信