Topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Prevent Wound Complications Following Cesarean Delivery in High-Risk Obstetric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

M.G. Gonzalez, M. Barske, K.B. Kjellsson, K. Saboda, H. Reed, M.G. Hill
{"title":"Topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Prevent Wound Complications Following Cesarean Delivery in High-Risk Obstetric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"M.G. Gonzalez, M. Barske, K.B. Kjellsson, K. Saboda, H. Reed, M.G. Hill","doi":"10.1097/01.aoa.0001016060.91416.b8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;63:516–520)\n The prevalence of cesarean deliveries (CD) has surged in recent decades, paralleling an uptick in medical complications during pregnancy linked to delayed childbearing and rising obesity rates. Consequently, post-CD wound complications have become a significant health concern. Mitigating these complications is a priority, with various wound vacuum systems available. While concerns persist about their effectiveness compared to standard treatments, some evidence suggests modest benefits, particularly in nonobstetric settings. The PICO wound vacuum system has shown promise for clean, noninfected surgical wounds, including cesarean incisions, though data is mainly from small trials or retrospective cohorts. Our study explores the use of PICO in preventing wound infections and breakdown in women with risk factors for complications postcesarean delivery.","PeriodicalId":19432,"journal":{"name":"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest","volume":"9 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0001016060.91416.b8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;63:516–520) The prevalence of cesarean deliveries (CD) has surged in recent decades, paralleling an uptick in medical complications during pregnancy linked to delayed childbearing and rising obesity rates. Consequently, post-CD wound complications have become a significant health concern. Mitigating these complications is a priority, with various wound vacuum systems available. While concerns persist about their effectiveness compared to standard treatments, some evidence suggests modest benefits, particularly in nonobstetric settings. The PICO wound vacuum system has shown promise for clean, noninfected surgical wounds, including cesarean incisions, though data is mainly from small trials or retrospective cohorts. Our study explores the use of PICO in preventing wound infections and breakdown in women with risk factors for complications postcesarean delivery.
预防高危产科病人剖宫产术后伤口并发症的局部负压伤口疗法:随机对照试验
(Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023; 63:516-520)近几十年来,剖宫产(CD)的发病率激增,与此同时,与生育延迟和肥胖率上升有关的孕期医疗并发症也在增加。因此,剖腹产后伤口并发症已成为一个重要的健康问题。缓解这些并发症是当务之急,目前有多种伤口真空系统可供选择。虽然与标准治疗方法相比,这些系统的效果仍令人担忧,但一些证据表明,它们的效果并不明显,尤其是在非产科环境中。PICO 伤口真空系统在清洁、未感染的手术伤口(包括剖宫产切口)方面显示出了良好的前景,但数据主要来自小型试验或回顾性队列。我们的研究探讨了 PICO 在预防具有剖宫产后并发症风险因素的产妇伤口感染和破裂方面的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信