Perinatal Outcomes and the Role of Obstetric Anesthesia Interventions

D.N. Lucas, J. Bamber, S. Quasim
{"title":"Perinatal Outcomes and the Role of Obstetric Anesthesia Interventions","authors":"D.N. Lucas, J. Bamber, S. Quasim","doi":"10.1097/01.aoa.0001015908.87799.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(Lancet 2023;401:2038–2039)\n This editorial discusses multiple recent studies that investigated perinatal outcomes and the impact of anesthetic interventions. A prior study published in the Lancet in 2022 reported poorer perinatal outcomes for neonates born to Black women compared to those born to White women. Another study examined nearly 450,000 deliveries and found an association between neonatal outcomes (Apgar <7 at 5 min, need for neonatal resuscitation, and neonatal admission to the intensive care unit) and maternal use of epidural analgesia. The authors of this editorial examined their own data regarding the incidence of obstetric anesthetic procedures among different ethnic groups and found that compared to White British women who had vaginal birth, incidence of epidural analgesia among Bangladeshi, Pakistani, Black African, and Black Caribbean women was much lower. They noted that similar disparities can be found in the United States and reiterated the socioeconomic and systemic disparities as one likely cause for poor neonatal outcomes, suggesting that offering equal access to neuraxial analgesia across all populations could lead to improved neonatal outcomes for Black women.","PeriodicalId":19432,"journal":{"name":"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest","volume":"2 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0001015908.87799.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(Lancet 2023;401:2038–2039) This editorial discusses multiple recent studies that investigated perinatal outcomes and the impact of anesthetic interventions. A prior study published in the Lancet in 2022 reported poorer perinatal outcomes for neonates born to Black women compared to those born to White women. Another study examined nearly 450,000 deliveries and found an association between neonatal outcomes (Apgar <7 at 5 min, need for neonatal resuscitation, and neonatal admission to the intensive care unit) and maternal use of epidural analgesia. The authors of this editorial examined their own data regarding the incidence of obstetric anesthetic procedures among different ethnic groups and found that compared to White British women who had vaginal birth, incidence of epidural analgesia among Bangladeshi, Pakistani, Black African, and Black Caribbean women was much lower. They noted that similar disparities can be found in the United States and reiterated the socioeconomic and systemic disparities as one likely cause for poor neonatal outcomes, suggesting that offering equal access to neuraxial analgesia across all populations could lead to improved neonatal outcomes for Black women.
围产期结果和产科麻醉干预的作用
(Lancet 2023;401:2038-2039)这篇社论讨论了近期多项调查围产期结局和麻醉干预影响的研究。2022 年发表在《柳叶刀》上的一项研究报告称,与白人妇女所生的新生儿相比,黑人妇女所生的新生儿围产期预后较差。另一项研究检查了近 45 万例分娩,发现新生儿预后(5 分钟内 Apgar <7、新生儿复苏需求和新生儿入住重症监护室)与产妇使用硬膜外镇痛之间存在关联。这篇社论的作者研究了他们自己关于不同种族群体产科麻醉程序发生率的数据,发现与阴道分娩的英国白人妇女相比,孟加拉、巴基斯坦、非洲黑人和加勒比黑人妇女的硬膜外镇痛发生率要低得多。他们指出,美国也存在类似的差异,并重申社会经济和系统差异可能是新生儿结局不佳的原因之一,建议为所有人群提供平等的神经镇痛机会,从而改善黑人妇女的新生儿结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信