Influence of storage length on the nutritive value of baleage

IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY
Justin C. Burt, Lisa L. Baxter, Sydney L. Payne, Taylor J. Hendricks, R. Lawton Stewart Jr., Jennifer J. Tucker
{"title":"Influence of storage length on the nutritive value of baleage","authors":"Justin C. Burt,&nbsp;Lisa L. Baxter,&nbsp;Sydney L. Payne,&nbsp;Taylor J. Hendricks,&nbsp;R. Lawton Stewart Jr.,&nbsp;Jennifer J. Tucker","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>High-quality forages can benefit from being harvested as baleage when the environmental conditions are not favorable for dry hay production. Currently, it is recommended that baleage should be fed within 9-months post-harvest; however, mild winters can reduce the demand for these stored forages. Data are limited on the changes in nutritive value of baleage stored beyond the recommended timepoint. Therefore, the objective was to determine the effect of storage length on nutritive value of forage harvested and stored as baleage. This study evaluated baleage harvested from 2016 to 2018 in Tifton, GA, consisting of either bermudagrass (<i>Cynodon dactylon</i> L. Pers.), or a mixture of bermudagrass and alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.). Baleage was sampled for nutritive value analysis at 6-weeks and 9- and 12-months post-harvest, with a subset of bales sampled at 24 months. Regardless of forage, crude protein, total digestible nutrients, and in-vitro dry matter digestibility at 48 h were not impacted in bales sampled up to 12-months post-harvest (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.07). However, acid detergent fiber increased when baleage was stored beyond 6 weeks but did not change from 9 to 12 months (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). In the subset of bales stored up to 24-months post-harvest, all nutritive value parameters evaluated were negatively impacted (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). The prolonged storage period may negatively affect the baleage plastic integrity, resulting in a decline in nutritive value if anaerobic conditions are not maintained. Future research is warranted to evaluate the changes in the fermentation profile of baleage under extended storage conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20280","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.20280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-quality forages can benefit from being harvested as baleage when the environmental conditions are not favorable for dry hay production. Currently, it is recommended that baleage should be fed within 9-months post-harvest; however, mild winters can reduce the demand for these stored forages. Data are limited on the changes in nutritive value of baleage stored beyond the recommended timepoint. Therefore, the objective was to determine the effect of storage length on nutritive value of forage harvested and stored as baleage. This study evaluated baleage harvested from 2016 to 2018 in Tifton, GA, consisting of either bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L. Pers.), or a mixture of bermudagrass and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Baleage was sampled for nutritive value analysis at 6-weeks and 9- and 12-months post-harvest, with a subset of bales sampled at 24 months. Regardless of forage, crude protein, total digestible nutrients, and in-vitro dry matter digestibility at 48 h were not impacted in bales sampled up to 12-months post-harvest (p > 0.07). However, acid detergent fiber increased when baleage was stored beyond 6 weeks but did not change from 9 to 12 months (p < 0.01). In the subset of bales stored up to 24-months post-harvest, all nutritive value parameters evaluated were negatively impacted (p < 0.01). The prolonged storage period may negatively affect the baleage plastic integrity, resulting in a decline in nutritive value if anaerobic conditions are not maintained. Future research is warranted to evaluate the changes in the fermentation profile of baleage under extended storage conditions.

贮藏时间对包谷营养价值的影响
当环境条件不利于干草生产时,高质量的饲草可以通过捆包收获而获益。目前,建议在收获后 9 个月内饲喂包谷;但是,温和的冬季会减少对这些贮存饲草的需求。关于包谷在建议时间点之后的营养价值变化的数据很有限。因此,本研究的目的是确定贮藏时间对收获并贮藏成捆的饲草营养价值的影响。本研究评估了 2016 年至 2018 年在佐治亚州蒂夫顿收获的包谷,包括百慕大草(Cynodon dactylon L. Pers.)或百慕大草与紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)的混合物。在收割后 6 周、9 个月和 12 个月时对草捆进行取样,进行营养价值分析,并在 24 个月时对部分草捆取样。不论是哪种饲草,收获后 12 个月内取样的草捆中的粗蛋白、可消化总养分和 48 小时体外干物质消化率都没有受到影响(p > 0.07)。然而,当草捆存放超过 6 周时,酸性洗涤纤维会增加,但在 9 至 12 个月期间没有变化(p < 0.01)。在收获后储存长达 24 个月的包谷子集中,所有营养价值评估参数都受到了负面影响(p < 0.01)。如果不保持厌氧条件,延长贮存期可能会对包材的塑性完整性产生负面影响,导致营养价值下降。今后有必要开展研究,以评估在延长储藏条件下包谷发酵情况的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management is a peer-reviewed, international, electronic journal covering all aspects of applied crop, forage and grazinglands, and turfgrass management. The journal serves the professions related to the management of crops, forages and grazinglands, and turfgrass by publishing research, briefs, reviews, perspectives, and diagnostic and management guides that are beneficial to researchers, practitioners, educators, and industry representatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信