How can patient experience of abortion care be improved? Evidence from the SACHA study.

Maria Lewandowska, Rachel Scott, Rebecca Meiksin, Jennifer Reiter, Natasha Salaria, Patricia A Lohr, Sharon Cameron, Melissa Palmer, Rebecca S French, Kaye Wellings
{"title":"How can patient experience of abortion care be improved? Evidence from the SACHA study.","authors":"Maria Lewandowska, Rachel Scott, Rebecca Meiksin, Jennifer Reiter, Natasha Salaria, Patricia A Lohr, Sharon Cameron, Melissa Palmer, Rebecca S French, Kaye Wellings","doi":"10.1177/17455057241242675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Models of abortion care have changed significantly in the last decade, most markedly during the COVID-19 pandemic, when home management of early medical abortion with telemedical support was approved in Britain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our study aimed to examine women's satisfaction with abortion care and their suggestions for improvements.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative, in-depth, semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A purposive sample of 48 women with recent experience of abortion was recruited between July 2021 and August 2022 from independent sector and National Health Service abortion services in Scotland, Wales and England. Interviews were conducted by phone or via video call. Women were asked about their abortion experience and for suggestions for any improvements that could be made along their patient journey - from help-seeking, the initial consultation, referral, treatment, to aftercare. Data were analyzed using the Framework Method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were aged 16-43 years; 39 had had a medical abortion, 8 a surgical abortion, and 1 both. The majority were satisfied with their clinical care. The supportive, kind and non-judgmental attitudes of abortion providers were highly valued, as was the convenience afforded by remotely supported home management of medical abortion. Suggestions for improvement across the patient journey centred around the need for timely care; greater correspondence between expectations and reality; the importance of choice; and the need for greater personal and emotional support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recent changes in models of care present both opportunities and challenges for quality of care. The perspectives of patients highlight further opportunities for improving care and support. The principles of timely care, choice, management of expectations, and emotional support should inform further service configuration.</p>","PeriodicalId":75327,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (London, England)","volume":"20 ","pages":"17455057241242675"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11128172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057241242675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Models of abortion care have changed significantly in the last decade, most markedly during the COVID-19 pandemic, when home management of early medical abortion with telemedical support was approved in Britain.

Objective: Our study aimed to examine women's satisfaction with abortion care and their suggestions for improvements.

Design: Qualitative, in-depth, semi-structured interviews.

Methods: A purposive sample of 48 women with recent experience of abortion was recruited between July 2021 and August 2022 from independent sector and National Health Service abortion services in Scotland, Wales and England. Interviews were conducted by phone or via video call. Women were asked about their abortion experience and for suggestions for any improvements that could be made along their patient journey - from help-seeking, the initial consultation, referral, treatment, to aftercare. Data were analyzed using the Framework Method.

Results: Participants were aged 16-43 years; 39 had had a medical abortion, 8 a surgical abortion, and 1 both. The majority were satisfied with their clinical care. The supportive, kind and non-judgmental attitudes of abortion providers were highly valued, as was the convenience afforded by remotely supported home management of medical abortion. Suggestions for improvement across the patient journey centred around the need for timely care; greater correspondence between expectations and reality; the importance of choice; and the need for greater personal and emotional support.

Conclusion: Recent changes in models of care present both opportunities and challenges for quality of care. The perspectives of patients highlight further opportunities for improving care and support. The principles of timely care, choice, management of expectations, and emotional support should inform further service configuration.

如何改善患者对人工流产护理的体验?来自 SACHA 研究的证据。
背景:在过去十年中,人工流产护理模式发生了重大变化,最明显的变化发生在 COVID-19 大流行期间,当时英国批准了在远程医疗支持下对早期药物流产进行家庭管理:我们的研究旨在了解妇女对人工流产护理的满意度及其改进建议:设计:定性、深入、半结构化访谈:方法:2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 8 月期间,我们从苏格兰、威尔士和英格兰的独立部门和国民健康服务人工流产服务机构招募了 48 名近期有过人工流产经历的女性作为目的性样本。访谈通过电话或视频通话进行。妇女们被问及她们的堕胎经历,并就患者从寻求帮助、初次咨询、转诊、治疗到术后护理的整个过程中可以改进的地方提出建议。数据采用框架法进行分析:参与者的年龄在 16-43 岁之间,其中 39 人做过药物流产,8 人做过手术流产,1 人两者都做过。大多数人对临床护理感到满意。流产服务提供者的支持、亲切和不带偏见的态度以及远程支持的家庭药物流产管理所提供的便利受到高度评价。对患者整个流产过程的改进建议主要集中在:需要及时的护理;期望与现实之间更紧密的联系;选择的重要性;以及需要更多的个人和情感支持:结论:近期医疗模式的变化为医疗质量带来了机遇和挑战。病人的观点凸显了改善护理和支持的更多机会。及时护理、选择、期望管理和情感支持等原则应为进一步的服务配置提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信