Unraveling the travel patterns of ride-hailing users: A latent class cluster analysis across income groups in Yogyakarta, Indonesia

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Muchlis Muchlisin , Jaime Soza-Parra , Yusak O. Susilo , Dick Ettema
{"title":"Unraveling the travel patterns of ride-hailing users: A latent class cluster analysis across income groups in Yogyakarta, Indonesia","authors":"Muchlis Muchlisin ,&nbsp;Jaime Soza-Parra ,&nbsp;Yusak O. Susilo ,&nbsp;Dick Ettema","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study provides valuable insights into ride-hailing trip patterns among various income groups, including lower-income groups and those living below the poverty line, groups often overlooked in previous research. Using latent class cluster analysis (LCCA) based on a survey in Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia, we examine how variations in trip pattern characteristics are influenced by socio-demographics, household characteristics, and travel-related attitudes toward ride-hailing usage. Our results establish that six distinct clusters representing different ride-hailing travel patterns can be identified. We found dominant clusters for short and less expensive trips using motorcycle-based ride-hailing services (RH MC). In contrast, longer and more expensive trips are associated with car-based ride-hailing (RH CAR). Moreover, ride-hailing plays an important role in essential trips such as returning home, commuting, and maintenance activities, highlighting its importance in addressing transportation challenges, particularly in regions with limited public transportation access. Lower-income individuals and those living in poverty tend to use ride-hailing primarily for shorter and cheaper trips with RH MC, while those from higher-income brackets utilize it for a broader range of purposes. These findings highlight the diverse effects of ride-hailing across income groups and suggest the potential for ride-hailing to enhance accessibility for low-income individuals in Indonesia. We propose policy recommendations to alleviate transport poverty and enhance transport equity in light of these findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24000991/pdfft?md5=95c25de0aae39dc66c6dc3fa1ecd5378&pid=1-s2.0-S2214367X24000991-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24000991","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study provides valuable insights into ride-hailing trip patterns among various income groups, including lower-income groups and those living below the poverty line, groups often overlooked in previous research. Using latent class cluster analysis (LCCA) based on a survey in Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia, we examine how variations in trip pattern characteristics are influenced by socio-demographics, household characteristics, and travel-related attitudes toward ride-hailing usage. Our results establish that six distinct clusters representing different ride-hailing travel patterns can be identified. We found dominant clusters for short and less expensive trips using motorcycle-based ride-hailing services (RH MC). In contrast, longer and more expensive trips are associated with car-based ride-hailing (RH CAR). Moreover, ride-hailing plays an important role in essential trips such as returning home, commuting, and maintenance activities, highlighting its importance in addressing transportation challenges, particularly in regions with limited public transportation access. Lower-income individuals and those living in poverty tend to use ride-hailing primarily for shorter and cheaper trips with RH MC, while those from higher-income brackets utilize it for a broader range of purposes. These findings highlight the diverse effects of ride-hailing across income groups and suggest the potential for ride-hailing to enhance accessibility for low-income individuals in Indonesia. We propose policy recommendations to alleviate transport poverty and enhance transport equity in light of these findings.

解读打车用户的出行模式:印度尼西亚日惹不同收入群体的潜类聚类分析
本研究为了解不同收入群体(包括低收入群体和生活在贫困线以下的群体)的打车出行模式提供了有价值的见解,而这些群体在以往的研究中往往被忽视。我们以印度尼西亚日惹省的一项调查为基础,利用潜类聚类分析(LCCA),研究了出行模式特征的变化如何受到社会人口统计、家庭特征以及与出行相关的乘车态度的影响。我们的研究结果表明,有六个不同的集群代表了不同的打车出行模式。我们发现,使用以摩托车为基础的叫车服务(RH MC)的短途和低价出行是主要集群。相比之下,时间较长、费用较高的出行则与汽车叫车服务(RH CAR)有关。此外,打车服务在返乡、通勤和维修活动等基本出行中发挥着重要作用,凸显了其在应对交通挑战方面的重要性,尤其是在公共交通条件有限的地区。低收入者和生活贫困者倾向于使用打车服务,主要是为了与 RH MC 进行短途和廉价的出行,而高收入阶层的人使用打车服务的目的则更为广泛。这些发现凸显了打车服务对不同收入群体的不同影响,并表明打车服务有可能提高印尼低收入人群的出行便利性。根据这些发现,我们提出了缓解交通贫困和提高交通公平的政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信