Multiple marginalized identities: A qualitative exploration of intersectional perinatal experiences of birthing people of color with substance use disorder in Massachusetts

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Davida M. Schiff , William Z.M. Li , Erin C. Work , Latisha Goullaud , Julyvette Vazquez , Tabhata Paulet , Sarah Dorfman , Sabrina Selk , Bettina B. Hoeppner , Timothy Wilens , Judith A. Bernstein , Hafsatou Diop
{"title":"Multiple marginalized identities: A qualitative exploration of intersectional perinatal experiences of birthing people of color with substance use disorder in Massachusetts","authors":"Davida M. Schiff ,&nbsp;William Z.M. Li ,&nbsp;Erin C. Work ,&nbsp;Latisha Goullaud ,&nbsp;Julyvette Vazquez ,&nbsp;Tabhata Paulet ,&nbsp;Sarah Dorfman ,&nbsp;Sabrina Selk ,&nbsp;Bettina B. Hoeppner ,&nbsp;Timothy Wilens ,&nbsp;Judith A. Bernstein ,&nbsp;Hafsatou Diop","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Racial and ethnic inequities persist in receipt of prenatal care, mental health services, and addiction treatment for pregnant and postpartum individuals with substance use disorder (SUD). Further qualitative work is needed to understand the intersectionality of racial and ethnic discrimination, stigma related to substance use, and gender bias on perinatal SUD care from the perspectives of affected individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Peer interviewers conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with recently pregnant people of color with SUD in Massachusetts to explore the impact of internalized, interpersonal, and structural racism on prenatal, birthing, and postpartum experiences. The study used a thematic analysis to generate the codebook and double coded transcripts, with an overall kappa coefficient of 0.89. Preliminary themes were triangulated with five participants to inform final theme development.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study includes 23 participants of diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds: 39% mixed race/ethnicity (including 9% with Native American ancestry), 30% Hispanic or Latinx, 26% Black/African American, 4% Asian. While participants frequently names racial and ethnic discrimination, both interpersonal and structural, as barriers to care, some participants attributed poor experiences to other marginalized identities and experiences, such as having a SUD. Three unique themes emerged from the participants' experiences: 1) Participants of color faced increased scrutiny and mistrust from clinicians and treatment programs; 2) Greater self-advocacy was required from individuals of color to counteract stereotypes and stigma; 3) Experiences related to SUD history and pregnancy status intersected with racism and gender bias to create distinct forms of discrimination.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Pregnant and postpartum people of color affected by perinatal SUD faced pervasive mistrust and unequal standards of care from mostly white healthcare staff and treatment spaces, which negatively impacted their treatment access, addiction medication receipt, postpartum pain management, and ability to retain custody of their children. Key clinical interventions and policy changes identified by participants for antiracist action include personalizing anesthetic plans for adequate peripartum pain control, minimizing reproductive injustices in contraceptive counseling, and addressing misuse of toxicology testing to mitigate inequitable Child Protective Services (CPS) involvement and custody loss.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924000584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Racial and ethnic inequities persist in receipt of prenatal care, mental health services, and addiction treatment for pregnant and postpartum individuals with substance use disorder (SUD). Further qualitative work is needed to understand the intersectionality of racial and ethnic discrimination, stigma related to substance use, and gender bias on perinatal SUD care from the perspectives of affected individuals.

Methods

Peer interviewers conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with recently pregnant people of color with SUD in Massachusetts to explore the impact of internalized, interpersonal, and structural racism on prenatal, birthing, and postpartum experiences. The study used a thematic analysis to generate the codebook and double coded transcripts, with an overall kappa coefficient of 0.89. Preliminary themes were triangulated with five participants to inform final theme development.

Results

The study includes 23 participants of diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds: 39% mixed race/ethnicity (including 9% with Native American ancestry), 30% Hispanic or Latinx, 26% Black/African American, 4% Asian. While participants frequently names racial and ethnic discrimination, both interpersonal and structural, as barriers to care, some participants attributed poor experiences to other marginalized identities and experiences, such as having a SUD. Three unique themes emerged from the participants' experiences: 1) Participants of color faced increased scrutiny and mistrust from clinicians and treatment programs; 2) Greater self-advocacy was required from individuals of color to counteract stereotypes and stigma; 3) Experiences related to SUD history and pregnancy status intersected with racism and gender bias to create distinct forms of discrimination.

Conclusion

Pregnant and postpartum people of color affected by perinatal SUD faced pervasive mistrust and unequal standards of care from mostly white healthcare staff and treatment spaces, which negatively impacted their treatment access, addiction medication receipt, postpartum pain management, and ability to retain custody of their children. Key clinical interventions and policy changes identified by participants for antiracist action include personalizing anesthetic plans for adequate peripartum pain control, minimizing reproductive injustices in contraceptive counseling, and addressing misuse of toxicology testing to mitigate inequitable Child Protective Services (CPS) involvement and custody loss.

多重边缘化身份:对马萨诸塞州患有药物使用障碍的有色人种围产期交叉经历的定性探索。
导言:患有药物使用障碍(SUD)的孕妇和产后妇女在接受产前护理、心理健康服务和戒毒治疗时,仍然存在种族和民族不平等现象。需要进一步开展定性工作,从受影响者的角度了解种族和民族歧视、与药物使用相关的污名化以及性别偏见在围产期 SUD 护理方面的交叉性:同伴访谈者对马萨诸塞州最近怀孕的患有 SUD 的有色人种进行了半结构化定性访谈,以探讨内化的、人际的和结构性的种族主义对产前、分娩和产后经历的影响。该研究采用主题分析法生成代码集,并对记录誊本进行双重编码,总体卡方系数为 0.89。与五位参与者对初步主题进行了三角测量,以确定最终主题:研究包括 23 位不同种族/族裔背景的参与者:39% 为混合种族/族裔(包括 9% 有美国土著血统),30% 为西班牙裔或拉丁裔,26% 为黑人/非洲裔,4% 为亚裔。虽然参与者经常将人际和结构性的种族和民族歧视称为护理障碍,但也有一些参与者将不良经历归因于其他边缘化身份和经历,如患有 SUD。从参与者的经历中发现了三个独特的主题:1)有色人种参与者面临来自临床医生和治疗项目的更多审查和不信任;2)有色人种需要更大的自我主张来抵制陈规定型观念和污名化;3)与 SUD 病史和怀孕状况相关的经历与种族主义和性别偏见交织在一起,形成了不同形式的歧视:受到围产期药物滥用影响的有色人种孕妇和产后妇女面临着普遍的不信任和不平等的护理标准,这些不信任和不平等主要来自于白人医护人员和治疗场所,这对她们获得治疗、接受戒毒药物治疗、产后疼痛管理以及保留子女监护权的能力产生了负面影响。与会者提出了反种族主义行动的关键临床干预措施和政策变化,包括个性化麻醉计划,以充分控制围产期疼痛;最大限度地减少避孕咨询中的生殖不公正现象;解决滥用毒理学测试的问题,以减少儿童保护服务机构(CPS)的不公平介入和监护权的丧失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信