Self-Defense Training to Reduce Violence Against Women and Girls: An Integrative Review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Ashlyn M Johnson, Britt S Cole
{"title":"Self-Defense Training to Reduce Violence Against Women and Girls: An Integrative Review.","authors":"Ashlyn M Johnson, Britt S Cole","doi":"10.1177/10783903241254308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Violence against women and girls (VAWG) is a serious threat to individual and public health with vast negative impacts, including numerous physical and mental health issues, as well as societal and economic consequences. Numerous women's self-defense interventions have been proposed to reduce the risk of victimization.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The current integrative review, based on Whittemore and Knafl's framework, was completed to synthesize current evidence on women's self-defense training, the impact of such training on outcomes related to VAWG, and evaluate the strength of evidence for women's self-defense training interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, was performed including a comprehensive computer-assisted database search, as well as citation searching and website searching for studies that included quantitative outcomes related to VAGW published between 2011 and 2023. Data were extracted and analyzed in accordance with Whittemore and Knafl's (2005) methodology, and the body of evidence was synthesized and best evidence recommendations developed based on the ©The Johns Hopkins Hospital/The Johns Hopkins University Evidence-Based Practice Model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ultimately, 19 publications met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Key findings included strong evidence for women's self-defense training to reduce attempted rape, completed rape, and nonconsensual sexual contact, as well as emerging evidence for reduction in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, among other positive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further research is needed in more diverse populations at risk for violence and to identify key characteristics of effective interventions, including optimal content and dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":17229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","volume":" ","pages":"10783903241254308"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903241254308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Violence against women and girls (VAWG) is a serious threat to individual and public health with vast negative impacts, including numerous physical and mental health issues, as well as societal and economic consequences. Numerous women's self-defense interventions have been proposed to reduce the risk of victimization.

Aims: The current integrative review, based on Whittemore and Knafl's framework, was completed to synthesize current evidence on women's self-defense training, the impact of such training on outcomes related to VAWG, and evaluate the strength of evidence for women's self-defense training interventions.

Methods: A systematic literature search, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, was performed including a comprehensive computer-assisted database search, as well as citation searching and website searching for studies that included quantitative outcomes related to VAGW published between 2011 and 2023. Data were extracted and analyzed in accordance with Whittemore and Knafl's (2005) methodology, and the body of evidence was synthesized and best evidence recommendations developed based on the ©The Johns Hopkins Hospital/The Johns Hopkins University Evidence-Based Practice Model.

Results: Ultimately, 19 publications met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Key findings included strong evidence for women's self-defense training to reduce attempted rape, completed rape, and nonconsensual sexual contact, as well as emerging evidence for reduction in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, among other positive outcomes.

Conclusions: Further research is needed in more diverse populations at risk for violence and to identify key characteristics of effective interventions, including optimal content and dose.

减少针对妇女和女童暴力的自卫训练:综合评论》。
背景:暴力侵害妇女和女童行为(VAWG)严重威胁个人和公共健康,造成了巨大的负面影响,包括许多身心健康问题以及社会和经济后果。目的:本综述以 Whittemore 和 Knafl 的框架为基础,旨在综合当前有关妇女自卫训练的证据、此类训练对暴力侵害妇女和女童行为相关结果的影响,并评估妇女自卫训练干预措施的证据强度:在《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)声明的指导下,我们进行了系统的文献检索,包括全面的计算机辅助数据库检索、引文检索和网站检索,以查找 2011 年至 2023 年间发表的包含与暴力侵害妇女行为相关的定量结果的研究。按照Whittemore和Knafl(2005年)的方法提取和分析数据,并根据©约翰霍普金斯医院/约翰霍普金斯大学循证实践模式对证据进行综合,提出最佳证据建议:结果:最终有 19 篇出版物符合纳入标准并被纳入本综述。主要研究结果包括:有强有力的证据表明,女性自卫训练可以减少强奸未遂、强奸得逞和未经同意的性接触;有新的证据表明,除其他积极结果外,还可以减少创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状:需要对更多不同的暴力风险人群开展进一步研究,并确定有效干预措施的关键特征,包括最佳内容和剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (JAPNA) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal publishing up-to-date information to promote psychiatric nursing, improve mental health care for culturally diverse individuals, families, groups, and communities, as well as shape health care policy for the delivery of mental health services. JAPNA publishes both clinical and research articles relevant to psychiatric nursing. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信