Assessment of pain relief after four botulinum toxin A injection cycles in patients with post-stroke lower limb spasticity: A prospective, observational study

Q3 Medicine
A. Vázquez Doce , F.J. De León García , A. Mena , L. Ortiz-Fernández , M.P. Spottorno , F. Medina , P. Maisonobe , A. Herrera , I. García , F.J. Juan-García , on behalf of the RELIEF investigators group
{"title":"Assessment of pain relief after four botulinum toxin A injection cycles in patients with post-stroke lower limb spasticity: A prospective, observational study","authors":"A. Vázquez Doce ,&nbsp;F.J. De León García ,&nbsp;A. Mena ,&nbsp;L. Ortiz-Fernández ,&nbsp;M.P. Spottorno ,&nbsp;F. Medina ,&nbsp;P. Maisonobe ,&nbsp;A. Herrera ,&nbsp;I. García ,&nbsp;F.J. Juan-García ,&nbsp;on behalf of the RELIEF investigators group","doi":"10.1016/j.rh.2024.100856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Spasticity is common after a stroke and is an independent risk factor for developing pain. BotulinumtoxinA injection is the treatment of choice for focal spasticity. We examined the effect of intramuscular botulinumtoxinA on pain relief in patients in routine clinical practice who were experiencing pain as a primary complaint associated with post-stroke lower limb spasticity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Prospective, multicentre, post-marketing observational study. The study period was 16 months. The primary effectiveness variable was the mean change from baseline on the pain 0–10 Numerical Rating Scale after four botulinumtoxinA injection cycles. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline on the pain 0–100 Visual Analogue Scale, Goal Attainment Scale, modified Ashworth Scale, 10-Meter Walk Test, Penn Spasm Frequency Scale, and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 186 enrolled patients, 180 (96.8%) received botulinumtoxinA at least once. The mean (standard deviation) pain 0–10 Numerical Rating Scale score decreased significantly (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001) from 4.9 (2.2) at baseline to 2.5 (2.1) at study end, representing a 50% decrease in pain severity. Relief of pain due to spasticity was supported by improvement from baseline in all secondary variables except the 10-Meter Walk Test. Two adverse events (erysipelas and phlebitis) in one patient were considered likely to be related to botulinumtoxinA injection.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>BotulinumtoxinA appears to provide pain relief as an additional benefit of local treatment in patients with post-stroke lower limb spasticity for whom pain relief is a primary therapeutic goal (a Lay Abstract has been provided as <span>Appendix A</span>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39532,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitacion","volume":"58 3","pages":"Article 100856"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048712024000203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Spasticity is common after a stroke and is an independent risk factor for developing pain. BotulinumtoxinA injection is the treatment of choice for focal spasticity. We examined the effect of intramuscular botulinumtoxinA on pain relief in patients in routine clinical practice who were experiencing pain as a primary complaint associated with post-stroke lower limb spasticity.

Methods

Prospective, multicentre, post-marketing observational study. The study period was 16 months. The primary effectiveness variable was the mean change from baseline on the pain 0–10 Numerical Rating Scale after four botulinumtoxinA injection cycles. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline on the pain 0–100 Visual Analogue Scale, Goal Attainment Scale, modified Ashworth Scale, 10-Meter Walk Test, Penn Spasm Frequency Scale, and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey.

Results

Of 186 enrolled patients, 180 (96.8%) received botulinumtoxinA at least once. The mean (standard deviation) pain 0–10 Numerical Rating Scale score decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) from 4.9 (2.2) at baseline to 2.5 (2.1) at study end, representing a 50% decrease in pain severity. Relief of pain due to spasticity was supported by improvement from baseline in all secondary variables except the 10-Meter Walk Test. Two adverse events (erysipelas and phlebitis) in one patient were considered likely to be related to botulinumtoxinA injection.

Conclusion

BotulinumtoxinA appears to provide pain relief as an additional benefit of local treatment in patients with post-stroke lower limb spasticity for whom pain relief is a primary therapeutic goal (a Lay Abstract has been provided as Appendix A).

评估中风后下肢痉挛患者在四个 A 型肉毒毒素注射周期后疼痛缓解情况:前瞻性观察研究
导言痉挛是中风后的常见病,也是导致疼痛的一个独立危险因素。注射肉毒杆菌毒素是治疗局灶性痉挛的首选方法。我们研究了肌肉注射肉毒杆菌毒素 A 对常规临床实践中以疼痛为主诉的中风后下肢痉挛患者的疼痛缓解效果。研究为期 16 个月。主要疗效变量是四个肉毒杆菌毒素注射周期后疼痛0-10数字评分量表与基线相比的平均变化。次要终点包括疼痛0-100视觉模拟量表、目标达成量表、改良阿什沃斯量表、10米步行测试、宾州痉挛频率量表和36项短式健康调查与基线相比的变化。疼痛0-10分数值评定量表的平均值(标准差)从基线时的4.9(2.2)分显著下降到研究结束时的2.5(2.1)分(p < 0.0001),疼痛严重程度下降了50%。除 10 米步行测试外,所有次要变量均较基线有所改善,这证明痉挛引起的疼痛得到了缓解。一名患者出现的两种不良反应(红斑和静脉炎)被认为可能与注射肉毒杆菌毒素A有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rehabilitacion
Rehabilitacion Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: La revista que es desde hace más de 40 años la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Rehabilitación y referente de la mayoría de las Sociedades de la Especialidad de los países americanos de habla hispana. Se publican 5 números pluritemáticos al año y uno monográfico sobre un tema del mayor interés y actualidad designado por el consejo de redacción.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信