Academic dishonesty out, use of resources in

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Shahin Vaezi , Mahdi Vaezi , Fatemeh Nami
{"title":"Academic dishonesty out, use of resources in","authors":"Shahin Vaezi ,&nbsp;Mahdi Vaezi ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Nami","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The outbreak of COVID-19 necessitated the call for integrating teaching and assessment into virtual environments. To explore the types of resources students accessed during online exams, engineering students were administered an unproctored online English for Academic Purposes (EAP) mid-term exam. Subsequently, a questionnaire was administered to investigate students’ use of resources while taking the exam. The results of an exploratory factor analysis was used to categorize students’ use of resources, external to one's self, shedding light on student perception of the act. The analysis revealed that 60 % of the common variance could be attributed to access to both human and nonhuman resources external to oneself. The transition from face to face teaching and assessment to online education has led to an increase in the utilization of resources external to one's self. Traditionally this act has been termed academic dishonesty. The study argues that this should not be viewed as a disruption, but rather a symptom of the transition embraced by online education with recourse to high accessibility to online and offline resources. Despite the general notion that of the use of resources external to one's self is discouraged, students exhibited a prevalent tendency to use resources external to themselves on the online exam. Of significance is the call for a redefinition of what constitutes academic misbehavior or dishonesty in a world that is digitally connected 24/7.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100193"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000338/pdfft?md5=fbfc7d40aed2c79aeb769b04a917c175&pid=1-s2.0-S2666557324000338-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 necessitated the call for integrating teaching and assessment into virtual environments. To explore the types of resources students accessed during online exams, engineering students were administered an unproctored online English for Academic Purposes (EAP) mid-term exam. Subsequently, a questionnaire was administered to investigate students’ use of resources while taking the exam. The results of an exploratory factor analysis was used to categorize students’ use of resources, external to one's self, shedding light on student perception of the act. The analysis revealed that 60 % of the common variance could be attributed to access to both human and nonhuman resources external to oneself. The transition from face to face teaching and assessment to online education has led to an increase in the utilization of resources external to one's self. Traditionally this act has been termed academic dishonesty. The study argues that this should not be viewed as a disruption, but rather a symptom of the transition embraced by online education with recourse to high accessibility to online and offline resources. Despite the general notion that of the use of resources external to one's self is discouraged, students exhibited a prevalent tendency to use resources external to themselves on the online exam. Of significance is the call for a redefinition of what constitutes academic misbehavior or dishonesty in a world that is digitally connected 24/7.

学术不诚实 "出局","资源使用 "入局
COVID-19 的爆发要求将教学和评估融入虚拟环境。为了探究学生在在线考试中使用的资源类型,对工科学生进行了一次未经监考的在线学术英语(EAP)期中考试。随后进行了问卷调查,以了解学生在考试过程中对资源的使用情况。探索性因子分析的结果被用来对学生使用外部资源的情况进行分类,从而揭示学生对这一行为的看法。分析结果显示,60% 的共同差异可归因于对自身以外的人力资源和非人力资源的使用。从面对面的教学和评估过渡到在线教育,导致了对自身外部资源利用的增加。传统上,这种行为被称为学术不诚实。本研究认为,这不应被视为一种干扰,而应被视为在线教育过渡时期的一种症状,因为在线和离线资源的可获取性都很高。尽管人们普遍不鼓励使用外部资源,但学生们在在线考试中却表现出普遍使用外部资源的倾向。重要的是,在一个全天候数字连接的世界里,需要重新定义什么是学术不端或不诚实行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信