[Partial exchange of components in chronic hip infection].

Acta ortopedica mexicana Pub Date : 2024-03-01
W F Martínez, F Tillet, E J Bochatey, F A Lopreite
{"title":"[Partial exchange of components in chronic hip infection].","authors":"W F Martínez, F Tillet, E J Bochatey, F A Lopreite","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>one- or two-stage total revision is considered the gold standard for the treatment of hip arthroplasty with chronic infection. However, during the removal of a fixed prosthetic component, the host bone may be damaged, making definitive prosthetic reimplantation difficult.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>we present a series of patients treated for chronic periprosthetic hip infection with preservation of one fixed component.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>this study included 12 patients with hip arthroplasty and chronic periprosthetic infection scheduled for one or two-stage partial replacement with retention of a fixed component between June 2015 and January 2021. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years (mean, 4.08 years). None of the 12 patients in this series was lost to follow-up. We evaluated the evolution through clinical examination, Harris Hip Score, laboratory and radiological studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>at a mean follow-up of 4.08 years after prosthetic reimplantation, two of the 12 patients had recurrence of infection (16.6%), and the mean Harris hip score reached 63.6 points at the last follow-up assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>fixed implant preservation may be an acceptable option for patients with chronic periprosthetic hip infection when removal of the fixed component results in significant bone loss compromising future reimplantation. However, more studies are required on this treatment method.</p>","PeriodicalId":101296,"journal":{"name":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","volume":"38 2","pages":"95-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: one- or two-stage total revision is considered the gold standard for the treatment of hip arthroplasty with chronic infection. However, during the removal of a fixed prosthetic component, the host bone may be damaged, making definitive prosthetic reimplantation difficult.

Objective: we present a series of patients treated for chronic periprosthetic hip infection with preservation of one fixed component.

Material and methods: this study included 12 patients with hip arthroplasty and chronic periprosthetic infection scheduled for one or two-stage partial replacement with retention of a fixed component between June 2015 and January 2021. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years (mean, 4.08 years). None of the 12 patients in this series was lost to follow-up. We evaluated the evolution through clinical examination, Harris Hip Score, laboratory and radiological studies.

Results: at a mean follow-up of 4.08 years after prosthetic reimplantation, two of the 12 patients had recurrence of infection (16.6%), and the mean Harris hip score reached 63.6 points at the last follow-up assessment.

Conclusions: fixed implant preservation may be an acceptable option for patients with chronic periprosthetic hip infection when removal of the fixed component results in significant bone loss compromising future reimplantation. However, more studies are required on this treatment method.

[慢性髋关节感染的部分组件交换]。
导言:一期或二期全翻修被认为是治疗髋关节置换术慢性感染的金标准。然而,在移除固定假体组件的过程中,宿主骨可能会受到损伤,从而使明确的假体再植入变得困难。材料和方法:本研究纳入了2015年6月至2021年1月期间计划进行一期或二期部分置换术并保留固定组件的12例髋关节置换术并伴有慢性假体周围感染的患者。随访时间最短为 2 年(平均 4.08 年)。该系列的12名患者中没有一人失去随访。我们通过临床检查、Harris髋关节评分、实验室和放射学研究对患者的病情变化进行了评估。结果:假体再植后平均随访4.08年,12名患者中有2人感染复发(16.6%),最后一次随访评估时,Harris髋关节评分平均达到63.6分。结论:对于假体周围慢性髋关节感染患者来说,如果固定组件的移除导致骨质大量流失,影响未来的再植,那么保留固定组件可能是一种可接受的选择。然而,这种治疗方法还需要更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信