A Randomized, Parallel Design Study to Compare the Effects of Different Interdental Cleaning Modalities on Gingivitis and Plaque After a 6-Week Period of Home Use.

Farah Mirza, Melissa Nelson, Janice Ambers, Kimberly Milleman, Jeffery Milleman, Marilyn Ward
{"title":"A Randomized, Parallel Design Study to Compare the Effects of Different Interdental Cleaning Modalities on Gingivitis and Plaque After a 6-Week Period of Home Use.","authors":"Farah Mirza, Melissa Nelson, Janice Ambers, Kimberly Milleman, Jeffery Milleman, Marilyn Ward","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different interdental oral cleaning modalities on gingivitis and plaque following a 6-week period of home use. This was a randomized, four-arm, parallel design clinical trial. Study subjects were manual toothbrush (MTB) users with moderate to severe gingivitis, aged 18 to 65 years. Subjects were required at baseline to have a gingival bleeding score of ≥1 on at least 50 gingival sites per the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) and to have an overall plaque score of ≥0.6 per the Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI) following a 3- to 6-hour plaque accumulation period. Subjects were randomly assigned to use one of four oral care cleaning modalities: (1) NON group: MTB alone, (2) FLS group: MTB plus string floss, (3) IDB group: MTB plus an interdental brush, or (4) CPF group: MTB plus the Philips® Sonicare® Cordless Power Flosser with the Quad Stream nozzle. Efficacy measures (Modified Gingival Index [MGI], GBI, and RMNPI) and safety were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in gingival inflammation from baseline to week 6 as measured by the MGI. Of the 372 subjects randomized in the study, 364 completed a post-baseline MGI evaluation and were included in the analyses. The adjusted mean percent reduction in gingival inflammation from baseline to week 6 was -2.10% for the NON group, 2.82% for the FLS group, 2.60% for the IDB group, and 29.10% for the CPF group. Pairwise comparisons indicated that the CPF group was statistically significantly different from the NON, FLS, and IDB groups (.0001). In conclusion, adjunctive use of the Philips Sonicare Cordless Power Flosser with the Quad Stream nozzle and an MTB showed statistically better results in term of reducing gingival inflammation following 6 weeks of home use when compared to an MTB alone, an MTB used with string floss, and an MTB used with an interdental brush.</p>","PeriodicalId":72651,"journal":{"name":"Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)","volume":"45 Suppl 1","pages":"14-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different interdental oral cleaning modalities on gingivitis and plaque following a 6-week period of home use. This was a randomized, four-arm, parallel design clinical trial. Study subjects were manual toothbrush (MTB) users with moderate to severe gingivitis, aged 18 to 65 years. Subjects were required at baseline to have a gingival bleeding score of ≥1 on at least 50 gingival sites per the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) and to have an overall plaque score of ≥0.6 per the Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI) following a 3- to 6-hour plaque accumulation period. Subjects were randomly assigned to use one of four oral care cleaning modalities: (1) NON group: MTB alone, (2) FLS group: MTB plus string floss, (3) IDB group: MTB plus an interdental brush, or (4) CPF group: MTB plus the Philips® Sonicare® Cordless Power Flosser with the Quad Stream nozzle. Efficacy measures (Modified Gingival Index [MGI], GBI, and RMNPI) and safety were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in gingival inflammation from baseline to week 6 as measured by the MGI. Of the 372 subjects randomized in the study, 364 completed a post-baseline MGI evaluation and were included in the analyses. The adjusted mean percent reduction in gingival inflammation from baseline to week 6 was -2.10% for the NON group, 2.82% for the FLS group, 2.60% for the IDB group, and 29.10% for the CPF group. Pairwise comparisons indicated that the CPF group was statistically significantly different from the NON, FLS, and IDB groups (.0001). In conclusion, adjunctive use of the Philips Sonicare Cordless Power Flosser with the Quad Stream nozzle and an MTB showed statistically better results in term of reducing gingival inflammation following 6 weeks of home use when compared to an MTB alone, an MTB used with string floss, and an MTB used with an interdental brush.

一项随机平行设计研究,比较不同牙间隙清洁方式在家庭使用 6 周后对牙龈炎和牙菌斑的影响。
这项研究的目的是评估不同的牙间口腔清洁方式在家庭使用 6 周后对牙龈炎和牙菌斑的影响。这是一项随机、四臂、平行设计的临床试验。研究对象为患有中度至重度牙龈炎的手动牙刷(MTB)使用者,年龄在 18 岁至 65 岁之间。根据牙龈出血指数(GBI),受试者在基线时至少有 50 个牙龈部位的牙龈出血评分≥1 分;根据 Rustogi 改良海军牙菌斑指数(RMNPI),经过 3 到 6 小时的牙菌斑累积期后,受试者的总体牙菌斑评分≥0.6 分。受试者被随机分配使用四种口腔护理清洁模式中的一种:(1)NON 组:(2) FLS 组:MTB 加牙线,(3)IDB 组:MTB 加牙间隙刷,或 (4) CPF 组:MTB 组:MTB 加飞利浦® Sonicare® 无线强力冲牙器(带 Quad Stream 喷嘴)。在基线、2 周和 6 周时对疗效(改良牙龈指数 [MGI]、GBI 和 RMNPI)和安全性进行评估。主要疗效终点是通过 MGI 测定从基线到第 6 周牙龈炎症的减轻程度。在研究中随机抽取的 372 名受试者中,有 364 人完成了基线后的 MGI 评估并被纳入分析。从基线到第 6 周,NON 组牙龈炎症的调整后平均减少百分比为-2.10%,FLS 组为 2.82%,IDB 组为 2.60%,CPF 组为 29.10%。配对比较表明,CPF 组与 NON、FLS 和 IDB 组在统计学上有显著差异(0.0001)。总之,与单独使用 MTB、使用牙线的 MTB 和使用牙间刷的 MTB 相比,辅助使用带有 Quad Stream 喷嘴的飞利浦 Sonicare 无绳电动冲牙器和 MTB 在家庭使用 6 周后,在减少牙龈炎症方面显示出更好的统计学效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信