Optimising postoperative care: Same-day discharge after transurethral resection of the prostate.

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY
Kamil Malshy, Alejandra Balen, Borivoj Golijanin, Maximilian Jentzsch, Rachel Greenberg, Frances Kazal, Richard Glebocki, Katherine Danaher, Ryland Spence, Elias Hyams, Dragan Golijanin, Gyan Pareek, Samuel Eaton
{"title":"Optimising postoperative care: Same-day discharge after transurethral resection of the prostate.","authors":"Kamil Malshy, Alejandra Balen, Borivoj Golijanin, Maximilian Jentzsch, Rachel Greenberg, Frances Kazal, Richard Glebocki, Katherine Danaher, Ryland Spence, Elias Hyams, Dragan Golijanin, Gyan Pareek, Samuel Eaton","doi":"10.1177/17504589241251697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after transurethral resection of the prostate.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Five years of records were retrospectively analysed. Length of stay categorised patients into Groups 1 (same-day discharge) and 2 (standard-length discharge). Logistic regression analysis was performed, controlling for clinicodemographic factors. Student's t-test compared continuous bladder irrigation and catheter dwell times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 459 patients were identified between 2016 and 2021, 280 in Group 1 and 179 in Group 2, with median ages of 71.0 (interquartile range 36-92) and 72.0 (interquartile range 47-101) years (p = 0.067), respectively. Same-day discharge rates notably increased post-2018 (p = 0.025). Median prostate tissue resected in Group 2 was 7.1g (3.4-12.4g) and in Group 1 was 4.9g (2.4-10.2g; p = 0.034). While continuous bladder irrigation >1 hour was significantly lower in Group 1 than Group 2 (96.8% versus 27.4%; p = 0.0001), catheter dwell times were comparable (70.1 and 70.8 hours, respectively). Control-adjusted results showed a 40% reduction in emergency department representation odds for Group 1 compared with Group 2 (odds ratio = 0.60; 95% confidence interval = 0.37-0.99; p = 0.04). Length of stay was not significantly associated with hospital readmissions (p = 0.11). Continuous bladder irrigation for <1 hour in Group 1 was associated with a reduced emergency department representation (odds ratio = 0.43; 95% confidence interval = 0.197-0.980) but not readmission (odds ratio = 0.413; 95% confidence interval = 0.166-1.104).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Same-day discharge post-transurethral resection of the prostate may be a viable and safe option for carefully selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241251697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after transurethral resection of the prostate.

Materials and methods: Five years of records were retrospectively analysed. Length of stay categorised patients into Groups 1 (same-day discharge) and 2 (standard-length discharge). Logistic regression analysis was performed, controlling for clinicodemographic factors. Student's t-test compared continuous bladder irrigation and catheter dwell times.

Results: A total of 459 patients were identified between 2016 and 2021, 280 in Group 1 and 179 in Group 2, with median ages of 71.0 (interquartile range 36-92) and 72.0 (interquartile range 47-101) years (p = 0.067), respectively. Same-day discharge rates notably increased post-2018 (p = 0.025). Median prostate tissue resected in Group 2 was 7.1g (3.4-12.4g) and in Group 1 was 4.9g (2.4-10.2g; p = 0.034). While continuous bladder irrigation >1 hour was significantly lower in Group 1 than Group 2 (96.8% versus 27.4%; p = 0.0001), catheter dwell times were comparable (70.1 and 70.8 hours, respectively). Control-adjusted results showed a 40% reduction in emergency department representation odds for Group 1 compared with Group 2 (odds ratio = 0.60; 95% confidence interval = 0.37-0.99; p = 0.04). Length of stay was not significantly associated with hospital readmissions (p = 0.11). Continuous bladder irrigation for <1 hour in Group 1 was associated with a reduced emergency department representation (odds ratio = 0.43; 95% confidence interval = 0.197-0.980) but not readmission (odds ratio = 0.413; 95% confidence interval = 0.166-1.104).

Conclusions: Same-day discharge post-transurethral resection of the prostate may be a viable and safe option for carefully selected patients.

优化术后护理:经尿道前列腺切除术后当天出院。
简介:本研究旨在评估经尿道前列腺切除术后当天出院的可行性和安全性:本研究旨在评估经尿道前列腺切除术后当天出院的可行性和安全性:对五年来的记录进行了回顾性分析。住院时间将患者分为第一组(当天出院)和第二组(标准时间出院)。在控制临床人口学因素的基础上进行了逻辑回归分析。学生 t 检验比较了持续膀胱冲洗和导尿管停留时间:2016 年至 2021 年间共发现 459 例患者,其中第 1 组 280 例,第 2 组 179 例,中位年龄分别为 71.0 岁(四分位数间距 36-92 岁)和 72.0 岁(四分位数间距 47-101 岁)(p = 0.067)。2018年后,当天出院率明显增加(p = 0.025)。第 2 组切除的前列腺组织中位数为 7.1 克(3.4-12.4 克),第 1 组为 4.9 克(2.4-10.2 克;p = 0.034)。第一组连续膀胱灌注时间大于 1 小时的比例明显低于第二组(96.8% 对 27.4%;p = 0.0001),但导尿管停留时间相当(分别为 70.1 小时和 70.8 小时)。控制调整结果显示,与第二组相比,第一组的急诊科代表几率降低了 40%(几率比 = 0.60;95% 置信区间 = 0.37-0.99;P = 0.04)。住院时间与再住院率无明显关联(p = 0.11)。连续膀胱冲洗经尿道前列腺切除术后当天出院可能是经过精心挑选的患者的一种安全可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of perioperative practice
Journal of perioperative practice Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信