Mean Arterial Pressure and Neonatal Outcomes in Pregnancies Complicated by Mild Chronic Hypertension.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005611
Matthew D Moore, Hui-Chien Kuo, Rachel G Sinkey, Kim Boggess, Lorraine Dugoff, Baha Sibai, Kirsten Lawrence, Brenna L Hughes, Joseph Bell, Kjersti Aagaard, Rodney K Edwards, Kelly S Gibson, David M Haas, Lauren Plante, Torri D Metz, Brian Casey, Sean Esplin, Sherri Longo, Matthew K Hoffman, George R Saade, Kara K Hoppe, Janelle Foroutan, Methodius Tuuli, Michelle Y Owens, Hyagriv N Simhan, Heather A Frey, Todd Rosen, Anna Palatnik, Susan Baker, Phyllis August, Uma M Reddy, Wendy Kinzler, Emily J Su, Iris Krishna, Nguyet A Nguyen, Mary E Norton, Daniel Skupski, Yasser Y El-Sayed, Dotun Ogunyemi, Ronald Librizzi, Leonardo Pereira, Everett F Magann, Mounira Habli, Shauna Williams, Giancarlo Mari, Gabriella Pridjian, David S McKenna, Marc Parrish, Eugene Chang, Sarah Osmundson, Joanne N Quiñones, Justin Leach, Ayodeji Sanusi, Zorina S Galis, Lorie Harper, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Jeff M Szychowski, Alan T N Tita
{"title":"Mean Arterial Pressure and Neonatal Outcomes in Pregnancies Complicated by Mild Chronic Hypertension.","authors":"Matthew D Moore, Hui-Chien Kuo, Rachel G Sinkey, Kim Boggess, Lorraine Dugoff, Baha Sibai, Kirsten Lawrence, Brenna L Hughes, Joseph Bell, Kjersti Aagaard, Rodney K Edwards, Kelly S Gibson, David M Haas, Lauren Plante, Torri D Metz, Brian Casey, Sean Esplin, Sherri Longo, Matthew K Hoffman, George R Saade, Kara K Hoppe, Janelle Foroutan, Methodius Tuuli, Michelle Y Owens, Hyagriv N Simhan, Heather A Frey, Todd Rosen, Anna Palatnik, Susan Baker, Phyllis August, Uma M Reddy, Wendy Kinzler, Emily J Su, Iris Krishna, Nguyet A Nguyen, Mary E Norton, Daniel Skupski, Yasser Y El-Sayed, Dotun Ogunyemi, Ronald Librizzi, Leonardo Pereira, Everett F Magann, Mounira Habli, Shauna Williams, Giancarlo Mari, Gabriella Pridjian, David S McKenna, Marc Parrish, Eugene Chang, Sarah Osmundson, Joanne N Quiñones, Justin Leach, Ayodeji Sanusi, Zorina S Galis, Lorie Harper, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Jeff M Szychowski, Alan T N Tita","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the association between mean arterial pressure during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in participants with chronic hypertension using data from the CHAP (Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy) trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary analysis of the CHAP trial, an open-label, multicenter randomized trial of antihypertensive treatment in pregnancy, was conducted. The CHAP trial enrolled participants with mild chronic hypertension (blood pressure [BP] 140-159/90-104 mm Hg) and singleton pregnancies less than 23 weeks of gestation, randomizing them to active treatment (maintained on antihypertensive therapy with a goal BP below 140/90 mm Hg) or standard treatment (control; antihypertensives withheld unless BP reached 160 mm Hg systolic BP or higher or 105 mm Hg diastolic BP or higher). We used logistic regression to measure the strength of association between mean arterial pressure (average and highest across study visits) and to select neonatal outcomes. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (per 1-unit increase in millimeters of mercury) of the primary neonatal composite outcome (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, or intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4) and individual secondary outcomes (neonatal intensive care unit admission [NICU], low birth weight [LBW] below 2,500 g, and small for gestational age [SGA]) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,284 participants were included: 1,155 active and 1,129 control. Adjusted models controlling for randomization group demonstrated that increasing average mean arterial pressure per millimeter of mercury was associated with an increase in each neonatal outcome examined except NEC, specifically neonatal composite (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.12, 95% CI, 1.09-1.16), NICU admission (aOR 1.07, 95% CI, 1.06-1.08), LBW (aOR 1.12, 95% CI, 1.11-1.14), SGA below the fifth percentile (aOR 1.03, 95% CI, 1.01-1.06), and SGA below the 10th percentile (aOR 1.02, 95% CI, 1.01-1.04). Models using the highest mean arterial pressure as opposed to average mean arterial pressure also demonstrated consistent associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increasing mean arterial pressure was positively associated with most adverse neonatal outcomes except NEC. Given that the relationship between mean arterial pressure and adverse pregnancy outcomes may not be consistent at all mean arterial pressure levels, future work should attempt to further elucidate whether there is an absolute threshold or relative change in mean arterial pressure at which fetal benefits are optimized along with maternal benefits.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02299414.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005611","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the association between mean arterial pressure during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in participants with chronic hypertension using data from the CHAP (Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy) trial.

Methods: A secondary analysis of the CHAP trial, an open-label, multicenter randomized trial of antihypertensive treatment in pregnancy, was conducted. The CHAP trial enrolled participants with mild chronic hypertension (blood pressure [BP] 140-159/90-104 mm Hg) and singleton pregnancies less than 23 weeks of gestation, randomizing them to active treatment (maintained on antihypertensive therapy with a goal BP below 140/90 mm Hg) or standard treatment (control; antihypertensives withheld unless BP reached 160 mm Hg systolic BP or higher or 105 mm Hg diastolic BP or higher). We used logistic regression to measure the strength of association between mean arterial pressure (average and highest across study visits) and to select neonatal outcomes. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (per 1-unit increase in millimeters of mercury) of the primary neonatal composite outcome (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, or intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4) and individual secondary outcomes (neonatal intensive care unit admission [NICU], low birth weight [LBW] below 2,500 g, and small for gestational age [SGA]) were calculated.

Results: A total of 2,284 participants were included: 1,155 active and 1,129 control. Adjusted models controlling for randomization group demonstrated that increasing average mean arterial pressure per millimeter of mercury was associated with an increase in each neonatal outcome examined except NEC, specifically neonatal composite (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.12, 95% CI, 1.09-1.16), NICU admission (aOR 1.07, 95% CI, 1.06-1.08), LBW (aOR 1.12, 95% CI, 1.11-1.14), SGA below the fifth percentile (aOR 1.03, 95% CI, 1.01-1.06), and SGA below the 10th percentile (aOR 1.02, 95% CI, 1.01-1.04). Models using the highest mean arterial pressure as opposed to average mean arterial pressure also demonstrated consistent associations.

Conclusion: Increasing mean arterial pressure was positively associated with most adverse neonatal outcomes except NEC. Given that the relationship between mean arterial pressure and adverse pregnancy outcomes may not be consistent at all mean arterial pressure levels, future work should attempt to further elucidate whether there is an absolute threshold or relative change in mean arterial pressure at which fetal benefits are optimized along with maternal benefits.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02299414.

妊娠并发轻度慢性高血压时的平均动脉压和新生儿结局。
目的利用 CHAP(慢性高血压与妊娠)试验的数据,估计慢性高血压患者妊娠期平均动脉压与新生儿预后之间的关系:CHAP试验是一项关于妊娠期降压治疗的开放标签、多中心随机试验,我们对该试验进行了二次分析。CHAP试验招募了患有轻度慢性高血压(血压[BP] 140-159/90-104 mm Hg)且妊娠期不足23周的单胎妊娠患者,将他们随机分配到积极治疗(继续接受降压治疗,目标血压低于140/90 mm Hg)或标准治疗(对照组;除非血压达到收缩压160 mm Hg或更高或舒张压105 mm Hg或更高,否则不使用降压药)。我们使用逻辑回归法来测量平均动脉压(各次研究中的平均值和最高值)与新生儿预后之间的关联强度。我们计算了新生儿主要综合结果(支气管肺发育不良、早产儿视网膜病变、坏死性小肠结肠炎或脑室内出血 3 级或 4 级)和个别次要结果(新生儿重症监护室入院、出生体重低于 2,500 克和胎龄小[SGA])的未经调整和调整的几率比(以毫米汞柱为单位每增加 1 个单位):共纳入 2284 名参与者:结果:共纳入 2284 名参与者:1155 名积极参与者和 1129 名对照组参与者。控制随机分组的调整模型表明,每毫米汞柱平均动脉压的增加与除 NEC(特别是新生儿综合征)以外的各项新生儿结局的增加有关(调整后的几率比 [aOR] 1.12,95% CI,1.09-1.16)、NICU 入院(aOR 1.07,95% CI,1.06-1.08)、LBW(aOR 1.12,95% CI,1.11-1.14)、SGA 低于第五百分位数(aOR 1.03,95% CI,1.01-1.06)和 SGA 低于第十百分位数(aOR 1.02,95% CI,1.01-1.04)。使用最高平均动脉压与平均平均动脉压建立的模型也显示出一致的关联性:结论:除 NEC 外,平均动脉压的升高与大多数新生儿不良结局呈正相关。鉴于平均动脉压与不良妊娠结局之间的关系在所有平均动脉压水平下可能并不一致,未来的工作应尝试进一步阐明平均动脉压是否存在绝对阈值或相对变化,在此阈值下,胎儿的获益与母体的获益达到最佳:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02299414。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信