Interventions for insomnia in cancer patients and survivors-a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Eva Rames Nissen, Henrike Neumann, Sofie Møgelberg Knutzen, Emilie Nørholm Henriksen, Ali Amidi, Christoffer Johansen, Annika von Heymann, Peer Christiansen, Robert Zachariae
{"title":"Interventions for insomnia in cancer patients and survivors-a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Eva Rames Nissen, Henrike Neumann, Sofie Møgelberg Knutzen, Emilie Nørholm Henriksen, Ali Amidi, Christoffer Johansen, Annika von Heymann, Peer Christiansen, Robert Zachariae","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considering the persistent nature and higher prevalence of insomnia in cancer patients and survivors compared with the general population, there is a need for effective management strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the available evidence for the efficacy of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for insomnia in adult cancer patients and survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed data from 61 randomized controlled trials involving 6528 participants. Interventions included pharmacological, physical, and psychological treatments, with a focus on insomnia severity and secondary sleep and non-sleep outcomes. Frequentist and Bayesian analytical strategies were employed for data synthesis and interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) emerged as the most efficacious intervention for reducing insomnia severity in cancer survivors and further demonstrated significant improvements in fatigue, depressive symptoms, and anxiety. CBT-I showed a large postintervention effect (g = 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.57 to 1.15) and a medium effect at follow-up (g = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.92). Other interventions such as bright white light therapy, sleep medication, melatonin, exercise, mind-body therapies, and mindfulness-based therapies showed benefits, but the evidence for their efficacy was less convincing compared with CBT-I. Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia showed promise as a less burdensome alternative for patients in active cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBT-I is supported as a first-line treatment for insomnia in cancer survivors, with significant benefits observed across sleep and non-sleep outcomes. The findings also highlight the potential of less intensive alternatives. The research contributes valuable insights for clinical practice and underscores the need for further exploration into the complexities of sleep disturbances in cancer patients and survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11188797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Considering the persistent nature and higher prevalence of insomnia in cancer patients and survivors compared with the general population, there is a need for effective management strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the available evidence for the efficacy of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for insomnia in adult cancer patients and survivors.

Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed data from 61 randomized controlled trials involving 6528 participants. Interventions included pharmacological, physical, and psychological treatments, with a focus on insomnia severity and secondary sleep and non-sleep outcomes. Frequentist and Bayesian analytical strategies were employed for data synthesis and interpretation.

Results: Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) emerged as the most efficacious intervention for reducing insomnia severity in cancer survivors and further demonstrated significant improvements in fatigue, depressive symptoms, and anxiety. CBT-I showed a large postintervention effect (g = 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.57 to 1.15) and a medium effect at follow-up (g = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.92). Other interventions such as bright white light therapy, sleep medication, melatonin, exercise, mind-body therapies, and mindfulness-based therapies showed benefits, but the evidence for their efficacy was less convincing compared with CBT-I. Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia showed promise as a less burdensome alternative for patients in active cancer treatment.

Conclusions: CBT-I is supported as a first-line treatment for insomnia in cancer survivors, with significant benefits observed across sleep and non-sleep outcomes. The findings also highlight the potential of less intensive alternatives. The research contributes valuable insights for clinical practice and underscores the need for further exploration into the complexities of sleep disturbances in cancer patients and survivors.

对癌症患者和幸存者失眠的干预--全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:与普通人群相比,癌症患者和幸存者的失眠具有顽固性且发病率较高,因此需要采取有效的管理策略。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在全面评估现有的证据,以确定药物和非药物干预对成年癌症患者和幸存者失眠症的疗效:按照 PRISMA 指南,我们分析了 61 项随机对照试验的数据,涉及 6528 名参与者。干预措施包括药物、物理和心理治疗,重点关注失眠的严重程度以及次要睡眠和非睡眠结果。数据综合和解释采用了频数分析和贝叶斯分析策略:结果:失眠认知行为疗法(CBT-I)是降低癌症幸存者失眠严重程度最有效的干预方法,而且在疲劳、抑郁症状和焦虑方面也有显著改善。CBT-I 在干预后效果显著(g = 0.86; 95%CI : 0.57-1.15),在随访中效果中等(g = 0.55; 0.18-0.92)。其他干预措施,如BWL疗法、睡眠药物、褪黑素、运动、身心疗法和正念疗法都显示出了疗效,但与CBT-I相比,其疗效证据的说服力较弱。失眠症简易行为疗法有望成为正在接受癌症治疗的患者的一种负担较轻的替代疗法:结论:CBT-I 被支持作为治疗癌症幸存者失眠的一线疗法,在睡眠和非睡眠结果方面都有显著疗效。研究结果还强调了强度较低的替代疗法的潜力。这项研究为临床实践提供了宝贵的见解,并强调了进一步探索癌症患者和幸存者睡眠障碍复杂性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信