Comparison of the Efficacy of Tolterodine versus Oxybutynin in the Treatment of Children with Desmopressin-Resistant Enuresis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Neda Ezodin, MahboubehJafari Sarouei, Mohamad Khademlo, Sevda Hashemi Milani, Sahar Yousefi, Hamid Mohammadjafari
{"title":"Comparison of the Efficacy of Tolterodine versus Oxybutynin in the Treatment of Children with Desmopressin-Resistant Enuresis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Neda Ezodin, MahboubehJafari Sarouei, Mohamad Khademlo, Sevda Hashemi Milani, Sahar Yousefi, Hamid Mohammadjafari","doi":"10.4314/ejhs.v33i4.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enuresis, defined as involuntary nocturnal urination without any underlying organic disorder in a child expected to control urination, poses a common problem. This study evaluated the effectiveness of Tolterodine and Oxybutynin in children presenting with primary desmopressin-resistant enuresis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A randomized clinical trial was undertaken involving 68 participants aged between 5 and 16 years, all suffering from primary enuresis. These patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups for a three-month period: Group 1, treated with Oxybutynin and Desmopressin, and Group 2, treated with Tolterodine and Desmopressin. Data on demographics, clinical and laboratory findings, and subjective responses to treatment were gathered. The response was measured based on the frequency of wetting incidents per night and week and compared with pre-treatment data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups (30 patients in Group 1 and 38 patients in Group 2). The mean age of the patients was 88.97±27.09 months. In the first treatment group, 6 out of 30 patients (20%) experienced a complete treatment response, as did 5 out of 38 patients (13.2%) in the second treatment group. This difference between the groups was not statistically significant. Seven patients (23%) in the Oxybutynin group and 13 patients (34%) in the Tolterodine group reported a lack of response to treatment, a difference that also lacked statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients resistant to Desmopressin, the addition of anticholinergic drugs elicited a significant response in over half of the patients. However, no benefit was observed in using either Oxybutynin or Tolterodine in the treatment of Desmopressin-resistant enuresis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12003,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"33 4","pages":"611-620"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11111179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v33i4.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enuresis, defined as involuntary nocturnal urination without any underlying organic disorder in a child expected to control urination, poses a common problem. This study evaluated the effectiveness of Tolterodine and Oxybutynin in children presenting with primary desmopressin-resistant enuresis.

Materials and methods: A randomized clinical trial was undertaken involving 68 participants aged between 5 and 16 years, all suffering from primary enuresis. These patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups for a three-month period: Group 1, treated with Oxybutynin and Desmopressin, and Group 2, treated with Tolterodine and Desmopressin. Data on demographics, clinical and laboratory findings, and subjective responses to treatment were gathered. The response was measured based on the frequency of wetting incidents per night and week and compared with pre-treatment data.

Results: Patients were divided into two groups (30 patients in Group 1 and 38 patients in Group 2). The mean age of the patients was 88.97±27.09 months. In the first treatment group, 6 out of 30 patients (20%) experienced a complete treatment response, as did 5 out of 38 patients (13.2%) in the second treatment group. This difference between the groups was not statistically significant. Seven patients (23%) in the Oxybutynin group and 13 patients (34%) in the Tolterodine group reported a lack of response to treatment, a difference that also lacked statistical significance.

Conclusion: For patients resistant to Desmopressin, the addition of anticholinergic drugs elicited a significant response in over half of the patients. However, no benefit was observed in using either Oxybutynin or Tolterodine in the treatment of Desmopressin-resistant enuresis.

托特罗定与奥昔布宁治疗去氨加压素抵抗性遗尿症儿童的疗效比较:随机对照临床试验》。
背景:遗尿症是指儿童在没有任何潜在器质性病变的情况下不自主地夜间排尿,这种现象很常见。本研究评估了托特罗定和奥昔布宁对原发性去氨加压素抵抗性遗尿症儿童的疗效:这项随机临床试验涉及 68 名年龄在 5 至 16 岁之间、患有原发性遗尿症的参与者。这些患者被随机分配到两个治疗组中的一个,为期三个月:第一组接受奥昔布宁和去氨加压素治疗,第二组接受托特罗定和去氨加压素治疗。收集的数据包括人口统计学、临床和实验室检查结果以及对治疗的主观反应。根据每晚和每周的尿湿次数来衡量反应,并与治疗前的数据进行比较:患者分为两组(第一组 30 人,第二组 38 人)。患者的平均年龄为(88.97±27.09)个月。第一治疗组的 30 名患者中有 6 名(20%)获得了完全治疗反应,第二治疗组的 38 名患者中有 5 名(13.2%)获得了完全治疗反应。两组之间的差异无统计学意义。奥昔布宁组的 7 名患者(23%)和托特罗定组的 13 名患者(34%)报告对治疗无反应,这一差异也没有统计学意义:结论:对于对去氨加压素耐药的患者,添加抗胆碱能药物可使半数以上的患者产生明显反应。然而,在治疗对去氨加压素耐药的遗尿症时,无论是使用奥昔布宁还是托特罗定,都没有观察到任何益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
137
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences is a general health science journal addressing clinical medicine, public health and biomedical sciences. Rarely, it covers veterinary medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信