Effect of Alaska pollock-gelatin sheet on repair strength and regeneration of nerve.

Ryosuke Tsujisaka, Taku Suzuki, Shinsuke Shibata, Takuji Iwamoto, Tetsushi Taguchi, Masaya Nakamura
{"title":"Effect of Alaska pollock-gelatin sheet on repair strength and regeneration of nerve.","authors":"Ryosuke Tsujisaka, Taku Suzuki, Shinsuke Shibata, Takuji Iwamoto, Tetsushi Taguchi, Masaya Nakamura","doi":"10.1177/17531934241251670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study was to investigate the repair strength and the biocompatibility of Alaska pollock-derived gelatin (ApGltn) sheet for nerve repair. Cadaveric digital nerves were repaired with double suture, single suture + ApGltn sheet, single suture + fibrin glue, single suture, ApGltn sheet and fibrin. Maximum failure loads were measured (20 nerves each). Rat sciatic nerves were repaired with double suture, single suture + ApGltn sheet, single suture, ApGltn sheet, fibrin glue and resection (10 nerves each). Macroscopic appearance, muscle weight and histopathological findings were examined 8 weeks postoperatively. The mean failure load of ApGltn sheet (0.39 N) was significantly higher than that of a fibrin (0.05 N), and that of single suture + ApGltn sheet (1.32 N) was significantly higher than that of a single suture alone (0.97 N). Functional and histological assessments showed similar nerve recovery among the suture, ApGltn and fibrin groups. ApGltn sheet has potential for clinical application as an alternative to fibrin.</p>","PeriodicalId":94237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","volume":" ","pages":"76-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934241251670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the repair strength and the biocompatibility of Alaska pollock-derived gelatin (ApGltn) sheet for nerve repair. Cadaveric digital nerves were repaired with double suture, single suture + ApGltn sheet, single suture + fibrin glue, single suture, ApGltn sheet and fibrin. Maximum failure loads were measured (20 nerves each). Rat sciatic nerves were repaired with double suture, single suture + ApGltn sheet, single suture, ApGltn sheet, fibrin glue and resection (10 nerves each). Macroscopic appearance, muscle weight and histopathological findings were examined 8 weeks postoperatively. The mean failure load of ApGltn sheet (0.39 N) was significantly higher than that of a fibrin (0.05 N), and that of single suture + ApGltn sheet (1.32 N) was significantly higher than that of a single suture alone (0.97 N). Functional and histological assessments showed similar nerve recovery among the suture, ApGltn and fibrin groups. ApGltn sheet has potential for clinical application as an alternative to fibrin.

阿拉斯加花粉-明胶薄片对神经修复强度和再生的影响
该研究旨在探讨阿拉斯加狭鳕源明胶(ApGltn)片用于神经修复的修复强度和生物相容性。用双线缝合、单线缝合+ApGltn薄片、单线缝合+纤维蛋白胶、单线缝合、ApGltn薄片和纤维蛋白修复尸体数字神经。测量了最大破坏载荷(各 20 根神经)。用双线缝合、单线缝合 + ApGltn 片、单线缝合、ApGltn 片、纤维蛋白胶和切除法修复大鼠坐骨神经(各 10 根神经)。术后 8 周检查宏观外观、肌肉重量和组织病理学结果。ApGltn薄片的平均失效负荷(0.39 N)明显高于纤维蛋白(0.05 N),而单线缝合+ApGltn薄片的失效负荷(1.32 N)明显高于单线缝合(0.97 N)。功能和组织学评估显示,缝合组、ApGltn 组和纤维蛋白组的神经恢复情况相似。作为纤维蛋白的替代品,ApGltn 片材具有临床应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信