Comparing factors associated with overall satisfaction for different forms of remote breastfeeding support in the UK.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gill Thomson, Marie-Clare Balaam, Svetlana Tishkovskaya
{"title":"Comparing factors associated with overall satisfaction for different forms of remote breastfeeding support in the UK.","authors":"Gill Thomson, Marie-Clare Balaam, Svetlana Tishkovskaya","doi":"10.1186/s13006-024-00641-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remote forms of breastfeeding support, such as helplines and social media, offer a flexible and convenient form of support to offer help at critical points, e.g., when the risk of breastfeeding cessation is high. Currently, there is little known about who accesses different forms of remote breastfeeding support and what factors impact overall satisfaction. As part of an evaluation of the UK National Breastfeeding Helpline (NBH) (which offers breastfeeding support via a helpline and online media), we aimed to (a) understand who accesses different forms of NBH support, and (b) identify key factors associated with overall satisfaction for helpline and online media support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All service users who contacted the NBH between November 2021 and March 2022 were invited to participate in the evaluation via an online survey. Survey questions explored the type and timing of support, reasons for the contact, attitudes towards the help and support received, impact of the support on breastfeeding experiences and demographic factors. Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney tests explored variations in who accessed the helpline or online media. Multiple linear regression models were fitted to explore the factors related to the service users' 'overall satisfaction'. The quantitive data were combined with qualitative comments into descriptive themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, online media users were significantly more likely to be younger, White, multiparous, less educated and have English as a first language compared to those who contact the helpline. Similar factors that significantly influenced overall satisfaction for both support models were the service being easy to access, receiving helpful information that met expectations, resolving breastfeeding issues, and feeling reassured and more confident. Significant factors for the helpline were callers feeling understood and more knowledgeable about breastfeeding following the call, being able to put into practice the information provided, feeling encouraged to continue breastfeeding, feeling that the volunteer gave the support that was needed, and seeking out additional support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online and helpline forms of breastfeeding support suit different demographics and call purposes. While optimal breastfeeding support needs to be accessible, flexible and instrumental, helpline users need real-time relational support to deal with more complex challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":54266,"journal":{"name":"International Breastfeeding Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11112964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Breastfeeding Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-024-00641-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Remote forms of breastfeeding support, such as helplines and social media, offer a flexible and convenient form of support to offer help at critical points, e.g., when the risk of breastfeeding cessation is high. Currently, there is little known about who accesses different forms of remote breastfeeding support and what factors impact overall satisfaction. As part of an evaluation of the UK National Breastfeeding Helpline (NBH) (which offers breastfeeding support via a helpline and online media), we aimed to (a) understand who accesses different forms of NBH support, and (b) identify key factors associated with overall satisfaction for helpline and online media support.

Methods: All service users who contacted the NBH between November 2021 and March 2022 were invited to participate in the evaluation via an online survey. Survey questions explored the type and timing of support, reasons for the contact, attitudes towards the help and support received, impact of the support on breastfeeding experiences and demographic factors. Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney tests explored variations in who accessed the helpline or online media. Multiple linear regression models were fitted to explore the factors related to the service users' 'overall satisfaction'. The quantitive data were combined with qualitative comments into descriptive themes.

Results: Overall, online media users were significantly more likely to be younger, White, multiparous, less educated and have English as a first language compared to those who contact the helpline. Similar factors that significantly influenced overall satisfaction for both support models were the service being easy to access, receiving helpful information that met expectations, resolving breastfeeding issues, and feeling reassured and more confident. Significant factors for the helpline were callers feeling understood and more knowledgeable about breastfeeding following the call, being able to put into practice the information provided, feeling encouraged to continue breastfeeding, feeling that the volunteer gave the support that was needed, and seeking out additional support.

Conclusions: Online and helpline forms of breastfeeding support suit different demographics and call purposes. While optimal breastfeeding support needs to be accessible, flexible and instrumental, helpline users need real-time relational support to deal with more complex challenges.

比较英国不同形式远程母乳喂养支持总体满意度的相关因素。
背景:帮助热线和社交媒体等远程母乳喂养支持形式提供了一种灵活方便的支持方式,可在关键时刻(如停止母乳喂养的风险较高时)提供帮助。目前,人们对谁会使用不同形式的远程母乳喂养支持以及哪些因素会影响总体满意度知之甚少。作为英国全国母乳喂养帮助热线(NBH)(该热线通过帮助热线和在线媒体提供母乳喂养支持)评估的一部分,我们的目标是:(a)了解谁获得了 NBH 不同形式的支持;(b)确定与帮助热线和在线媒体支持总体满意度相关的关键因素:所有在 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 3 月期间联系过 NBH 的服务用户都被邀请通过在线调查参与评估。调查问题涉及支持类型和时间、联系原因、对所获帮助和支持的态度、支持对母乳喂养体验的影响以及人口统计因素。卡方检验和曼-惠特尼检验探讨了求助热线或网络媒体访问者的差异。多元线性回归模型用于探索与服务用户 "总体满意度 "相关的因素。定量数据与定性评论相结合,形成描述性主题:总体而言,与求助热线用户相比,在线媒体用户更可能是年轻人、白人、多胎妊娠者、受教育程度较低且英语为母语。对这两种支持模式的总体满意度有重大影响的类似因素包括:服务易于获得、获得的有用信息符合预期、解决了母乳喂养问题、感到放心和更有信心。对帮助热线而言,重要的影响因素是来电者在通话后感到自己被理解了,对母乳喂养有了更多的了解,能够将所提供的信息付诸实践,感到继续母乳喂养受到了鼓励,感到志愿者提供了所需的支持,以及寻求更多的支持:结论:在线和帮助热线形式的母乳喂养支持适合不同的人群和呼叫目的。最佳的母乳喂养支持需要方便、灵活和工具性,而帮助热线用户则需要实时的关系支持,以应对更复杂的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Breastfeeding Journal
International Breastfeeding Journal Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding is recognized as an important public health issue with enormous social and economic implications. Infants who do not receive breast milk are likely to experience poorer health outcomes than breastfed infants; mothers who do not breastfeed increase their own health risks. Publications on the topic of breastfeeding are wide ranging. Articles about breastfeeding are currently published journals focused on nursing, midwifery, paediatric, obstetric, family medicine, public health, immunology, physiology, sociology and many other topics. In addition, electronic publishing allows fast publication time for authors and Open Access ensures the journal is easily accessible to readers.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信