Detecting Alzheimer's Disease Stages and Frontotemporal Dementia in Time Courses of Resting-State fMRI Data Using a Machine Learning Approach.

Mohammad Amin Sadeghi, Daniel Stevens, Shinjini Kundu, Rohan Sanghera, Richard Dagher, Vivek Yedavalli, Craig Jones, Haris Sair, Licia P Luna
{"title":"Detecting Alzheimer's Disease Stages and Frontotemporal Dementia in Time Courses of Resting-State fMRI Data Using a Machine Learning Approach.","authors":"Mohammad Amin Sadeghi, Daniel Stevens, Shinjini Kundu, Rohan Sanghera, Richard Dagher, Vivek Yedavalli, Craig Jones, Haris Sair, Licia P Luna","doi":"10.1007/s10278-024-01101-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early, accurate diagnosis of neurodegenerative dementia subtypes such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is crucial for the effectiveness of their treatments. However, distinguishing these conditions becomes challenging when symptoms overlap or the conditions present atypically. Resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) studies have demonstrated condition-specific alterations in AD, FTD, and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) compared to healthy controls (HC). Here, we used machine learning to build a diagnostic classification model based on these alterations. We curated all rs-fMRIs and their corresponding clinical information from the ADNI and FTLDNI databases. Imaging data underwent preprocessing, time course extraction, and feature extraction in preparation for the analyses. The imaging features data and clinical variables were fed into gradient-boosted decision trees with fivefold nested cross-validation to build models that classified four groups: AD, FTD, HC, and MCI. The mean and 95% confidence intervals for model performance metrics were calculated using the unseen test sets in the cross-validation rounds. The model built using only imaging features achieved 74.4% mean balanced accuracy, 0.94 mean macro-averaged AUC, and 0.73 mean macro-averaged F1 score. It accurately classified FTD (F1 = 0.99), HC (F1 = 0.99), and MCI (F1 = 0.86) fMRIs but mostly misclassified AD scans as MCI (F1 = 0.08). Adding clinical variables to model inputs raised balanced accuracy to 91.1%, macro-averaged AUC to 0.99, macro-averaged F1 score to 0.92, and improved AD classification accuracy (F1 = 0.74). In conclusion, a multimodal model based on rs-fMRI and clinical data accurately differentiates AD-MCI vs. FTD vs. HC.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2768-2783"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11612109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01101-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early, accurate diagnosis of neurodegenerative dementia subtypes such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is crucial for the effectiveness of their treatments. However, distinguishing these conditions becomes challenging when symptoms overlap or the conditions present atypically. Resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) studies have demonstrated condition-specific alterations in AD, FTD, and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) compared to healthy controls (HC). Here, we used machine learning to build a diagnostic classification model based on these alterations. We curated all rs-fMRIs and their corresponding clinical information from the ADNI and FTLDNI databases. Imaging data underwent preprocessing, time course extraction, and feature extraction in preparation for the analyses. The imaging features data and clinical variables were fed into gradient-boosted decision trees with fivefold nested cross-validation to build models that classified four groups: AD, FTD, HC, and MCI. The mean and 95% confidence intervals for model performance metrics were calculated using the unseen test sets in the cross-validation rounds. The model built using only imaging features achieved 74.4% mean balanced accuracy, 0.94 mean macro-averaged AUC, and 0.73 mean macro-averaged F1 score. It accurately classified FTD (F1 = 0.99), HC (F1 = 0.99), and MCI (F1 = 0.86) fMRIs but mostly misclassified AD scans as MCI (F1 = 0.08). Adding clinical variables to model inputs raised balanced accuracy to 91.1%, macro-averaged AUC to 0.99, macro-averaged F1 score to 0.92, and improved AD classification accuracy (F1 = 0.74). In conclusion, a multimodal model based on rs-fMRI and clinical data accurately differentiates AD-MCI vs. FTD vs. HC.

Abstract Image

利用机器学习方法检测静息态 fMRI 数据时间序列中的阿尔茨海默病分期和前颞叶痴呆症
早期准确诊断阿尔茨海默病(AD)和额颞叶痴呆(FTD)等神经退行性痴呆亚型,对于提高治疗效果至关重要。然而,当症状重叠或症状表现不典型时,区分这些疾病就变得十分困难。静息态 fMRI(rs-fMRI)研究表明,与健康对照组(HC)相比,AD、FTD 和轻度认知障碍(MCI)会出现条件特异性改变。在此,我们利用机器学习建立了一个基于这些改变的诊断分类模型。我们从 ADNI 和 FTLDNI 数据库中收集了所有 rs-fMRI 及其相应的临床信息。为准备分析,我们对成像数据进行了预处理、时间进程提取和特征提取。将成像特征数据和临床变量输入梯度提升决策树,并进行五重嵌套交叉验证,以建立可划分为四组的模型:AD、FTD、HC 和 MCI。模型性能指标的平均值和 95% 的置信区间是使用交叉验证中未见的测试集计算得出的。仅使用成像特征建立的模型取得了 74.4% 的平均均衡准确率、0.94 的平均宏观平均 AUC 和 0.73 的平均宏观平均 F1 分数。该模型准确地对 FTD(F1 = 0.99)、HC(F1 = 0.99)和 MCI(F1 = 0.86)fMRI 进行了分类,但大部分 AD 扫描被误诊为 MCI(F1 = 0.08)。在模型输入中加入临床变量后,平衡准确率提高到 91.1%,宏观平均 AUC 提高到 0.99,宏观平均 F1 分数提高到 0.92,并提高了 AD 分类准确率(F1 = 0.74)。总之,基于 rs-fMRI 和临床数据的多模态模型能准确区分 AD-MCI 与 FTD 与 HC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信