What do the teachers want? A targeted needs assessment survey for prospective didactic training of psychiatry medical educators.

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
GMS Journal for Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-04-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma001673
Franziska Baessler, Ali Zafar, Katja Koelkebeck, Thomas Frodl, Jörg Signerski-Krieger, Severin Pinilla, Gottfried M Barth, Deborah Jannowitz, Sven Speerforck, Daniela Roesch-Ely, Ina Kluge, Miriam Aust, Janine Utz, Gian-Marco Kersten, Philipp Spitzer
{"title":"What do the teachers want? A targeted needs assessment survey for prospective didactic training of psychiatry medical educators.","authors":"Franziska Baessler, Ali Zafar, Katja Koelkebeck, Thomas Frodl, Jörg Signerski-Krieger, Severin Pinilla, Gottfried M Barth, Deborah Jannowitz, Sven Speerforck, Daniela Roesch-Ely, Ina Kluge, Miriam Aust, Janine Utz, Gian-Marco Kersten, Philipp Spitzer","doi":"10.3205/zma001673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Physicians and psychologists at psychiatric university hospitals are assigned teaching tasks from the first day of work without necessarily having the prerequisite training in teaching methods. This exploratory survey provides a needs-based analysis for the prospective didactic training of physicians and psychologists at psychiatric hospitals in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online questionnaire was distributed at medical schools via email in German-speaking countries in Europe. All physicians involved in teaching medical students at psychiatry faculties were eligible to participate in the survey. Participants were further requested to recruit eligible participants (snowball sampling). Responses were analyzed descriptively, and differences between groups were calculated using nonparametric Mann-Whitney U tests (p<.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 97 respondents (male=55, female=42; mean age= 40.6) from 19 medical schools completed the survey. The respondents consisted of 43 residents, 39 specialists, 6 chief physicians and 9 psychologists. Of the respondents, 97.6% rated didactic competence as either highly relevant or rather relevant for teaching medical students. The highest overall interest was shown for bedside teaching (mode=4; IQR: 2-4) and error culture (mode=3; IQR: 2-4). Respondents expressed the highest training needs for topics regarding presentation and communication (mode=3; IQR: 2-3). Resident physicians were significantly more interested in bedside teaching (U=362.0, p=0.004) and roleplay (U=425.0; p=0.036) than specialist physicians, who were more interested in examination didactics (U=415.0; p=0.022). Chief physicians displayed significantly deeper interest in group dynamics (U=51; p=0.023) than specialist physicians. In-person training was preferred by a majority of respondents, and 27.4% preferred online/web-based training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of physicians and psychologists at psychiatric university hospitals considered professional development for faculty to be helpful for teaching medical students. Bedside teaching and error culture management were the most desired teaching topics for training medical teachers. Tailored educational interventions are recommended, with target-oriented priorities for different hierarchical levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 2","pages":"Doc18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Physicians and psychologists at psychiatric university hospitals are assigned teaching tasks from the first day of work without necessarily having the prerequisite training in teaching methods. This exploratory survey provides a needs-based analysis for the prospective didactic training of physicians and psychologists at psychiatric hospitals in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

Methods: An online questionnaire was distributed at medical schools via email in German-speaking countries in Europe. All physicians involved in teaching medical students at psychiatry faculties were eligible to participate in the survey. Participants were further requested to recruit eligible participants (snowball sampling). Responses were analyzed descriptively, and differences between groups were calculated using nonparametric Mann-Whitney U tests (p<.05).

Results: Overall, 97 respondents (male=55, female=42; mean age= 40.6) from 19 medical schools completed the survey. The respondents consisted of 43 residents, 39 specialists, 6 chief physicians and 9 psychologists. Of the respondents, 97.6% rated didactic competence as either highly relevant or rather relevant for teaching medical students. The highest overall interest was shown for bedside teaching (mode=4; IQR: 2-4) and error culture (mode=3; IQR: 2-4). Respondents expressed the highest training needs for topics regarding presentation and communication (mode=3; IQR: 2-3). Resident physicians were significantly more interested in bedside teaching (U=362.0, p=0.004) and roleplay (U=425.0; p=0.036) than specialist physicians, who were more interested in examination didactics (U=415.0; p=0.022). Chief physicians displayed significantly deeper interest in group dynamics (U=51; p=0.023) than specialist physicians. In-person training was preferred by a majority of respondents, and 27.4% preferred online/web-based training.

Conclusions: The majority of physicians and psychologists at psychiatric university hospitals considered professional development for faculty to be helpful for teaching medical students. Bedside teaching and error culture management were the most desired teaching topics for training medical teachers. Tailored educational interventions are recommended, with target-oriented priorities for different hierarchical levels.

教师想要什么?精神病学医学教育工作者未来教学培训的目标需求评估调查。
目的:大学精神病院的医生和心理学家从工作的第一天起就被分配了教学任务,但他们并不一定接受过教学方法方面的先决培训。这项探索性调查为德国、奥地利和瑞士精神科医院的内科医生和心理学家的前瞻性教学培训提供了基于需求的分析:方法:通过电子邮件向欧洲德语国家的医学院发放在线调查问卷。所有参与精神病学系医学生教学的医生均有资格参与调查。此外,还要求参与者招募符合条件的参与者(滚雪球式抽样)。我们对受访者的回答进行了描述性分析,并使用非参数 Mann-Whitney U 检验(pResults:共有来自 19 所医学院校的 97 名受访者(男性 55 人,女性 42 人;平均年龄 40.6 岁)完成了调查。受访者包括 43 名住院医师、39 名专科医生、6 名主任医师和 9 名心理学家。在受访者中,97.6% 的人认为教学能力与医学生教学高度相关或相当相关。受访者对床边教学(mode=4;IQR:2-4)和错误文化(mode=3;IQR:2-4)的总体兴趣最高。受访者对演示和沟通方面的主题的培训需求最高(mode=3;IQR:2-3)。住院医师对床边教学(U=362.0,p=0.004)和角色扮演(U=425.0;p=0.036)的兴趣明显高于专科医生,后者对检查说教(U=415.0;p=0.022)更感兴趣。与专科医生相比,主任医师对群体动力学的兴趣明显更浓厚(U=51;p=0.023)。大多数受访者倾向于现场培训,27.4%的受访者倾向于在线/网络培训:大多数精神科大学医院的医生和心理学家认为,教师的专业发展有助于医学生的教学。床边教学和错误文化管理是医学教师培训中最受欢迎的教学主题。建议采取有针对性的教育干预措施,并针对不同级别的优先事项制定目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GMS Journal for Medical Education
GMS Journal for Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
30
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: GMS Journal for Medical Education (GMS J Med Educ) – formerly GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung – publishes scientific articles on all aspects of undergraduate and graduate education in medicine, dentistry, veterinary medicine, pharmacy and other health professions. Research and review articles, project reports, short communications as well as discussion papers and comments may be submitted. There is a special focus on empirical studies which are methodologically sound and lead to results that are relevant beyond the respective institution, profession or country. Please feel free to submit qualitative as well as quantitative studies. We especially welcome submissions by students. It is the mission of GMS Journal for Medical Education to contribute to furthering scientific knowledge in the German-speaking countries as well as internationally and thus to foster the improvement of teaching and learning and to build an evidence base for undergraduate and graduate education. To this end, the journal has set up an editorial board with international experts. All manuscripts submitted are subjected to a clearly structured peer review process. All articles are published bilingually in English and German and are available with unrestricted open access. Thus, GMS Journal for Medical Education is available to a broad international readership. GMS Journal for Medical Education is published as an unrestricted open access journal with at least four issues per year. In addition, special issues on current topics in medical education research are also published. Until 2015 the journal was published under its German name GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung. By changing its name to GMS Journal for Medical Education, we wish to underline our international mission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信