[The implementation of clinical assessment by nurses in Switzerland: A cross-sectional study from the nursing perspective].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Pflege Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1024/1012-5302/a001000
Marius Möller, Uta Christine Grosse, Veronika Waldboth
{"title":"[The implementation of clinical assessment by nurses in Switzerland: A cross-sectional study from the nursing perspective].","authors":"Marius Möller, Uta Christine Grosse, Veronika Waldboth","doi":"10.1024/1012-5302/a001000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The implementation of clinical assessment by nurses in Switzerland: A cross-sectional study from the nursing perspective <b>Abstract:</b> <i>Background:</i> Clinical assessment is a core competency of BSc and MSc prepared nurses in Switzerland. However, influencing factors of its implementation and the experience in the interprofessional team has been studied little so far. <i>Objective:</i> The aim of this study was to explore how often clinical assessment skills are used by BSc and MSc graduated nurses in Switzerland, to identify facilitating and hindering factors for implementation and to investigate the nurses experience of the implementation in the interprofessional team. <i>Method:</i> We used an exploratory, descriptive research design employing a cross-sectional study of the convenience sample of BScN and MScN graduates in Switzerland. 264 questionnaires were analysed quantitatively and 149 written statements as part of the survey qualitatively. <i>Results:</i> Respondents indicated that they routinely only use 18.9% of the 53 assessment skills they were trained in. The \"respiratory system\", \"abdomen\", \"skin\" and \"mental status\" were used most frequently. MScN graduates use respiratory assessments and BScN graduates use abdominal assessments more frequently. Lack of time and interruptions, lack of influence on patient care and specialty specific skills are hindering factors for the implementation. Better conditions at the institutional level and appreciation within the interprofessional team can make an encouraging contribution in future. <i>Conclusion:</i> This study illustrates, that the theory-practice transfer of clinical assessment in Switzerland needs to be further promoted.</p>","PeriodicalId":54625,"journal":{"name":"Pflege","volume":" ","pages":"256-264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pflege","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a001000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implementation of clinical assessment by nurses in Switzerland: A cross-sectional study from the nursing perspective Abstract: Background: Clinical assessment is a core competency of BSc and MSc prepared nurses in Switzerland. However, influencing factors of its implementation and the experience in the interprofessional team has been studied little so far. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore how often clinical assessment skills are used by BSc and MSc graduated nurses in Switzerland, to identify facilitating and hindering factors for implementation and to investigate the nurses experience of the implementation in the interprofessional team. Method: We used an exploratory, descriptive research design employing a cross-sectional study of the convenience sample of BScN and MScN graduates in Switzerland. 264 questionnaires were analysed quantitatively and 149 written statements as part of the survey qualitatively. Results: Respondents indicated that they routinely only use 18.9% of the 53 assessment skills they were trained in. The "respiratory system", "abdomen", "skin" and "mental status" were used most frequently. MScN graduates use respiratory assessments and BScN graduates use abdominal assessments more frequently. Lack of time and interruptions, lack of influence on patient care and specialty specific skills are hindering factors for the implementation. Better conditions at the institutional level and appreciation within the interprofessional team can make an encouraging contribution in future. Conclusion: This study illustrates, that the theory-practice transfer of clinical assessment in Switzerland needs to be further promoted.

[瑞士护士实施临床评估:从护理角度进行的横断面研究]。
瑞士护士实施临床评估的情况:从护理角度进行的横断面研究 摘要:背景:临床评估是瑞士学士和硕士护士的核心能力。然而,迄今为止,对其实施的影响因素以及跨专业团队的经验研究甚少。研究目的本研究旨在探讨瑞士理科学士和理科硕士护士使用临床评估技能的频率,确定实施的促进和阻碍因素,并调查护士在跨专业团队中的实施经验。研究方法:我们采用了探索性、描述性研究设计,对瑞士的理学士和理学硕士毕业生进行了横截面研究。对 264 份问卷进行了定量分析,并对作为调查一部分的 149 份书面陈述进行了定性分析。结果:受访者表示,在他们接受过培训的 53 项评估技能中,只有 18.9% 的技能是他们日常使用的。使用频率最高的是 "呼吸系统"、"腹部"、"皮肤 "和 "精神状态"。理学硕士毕业生使用呼吸系统评估的频率较高,理学学士毕业生使用腹部评估的频率较高。缺乏时间和干扰、对病人护理缺乏影响以及专业特定技能是阻碍实施的因素。改善机构层面的条件和跨专业团队内部的赞赏,可在未来做出令人鼓舞的贡献。结论这项研究表明,在瑞士,临床评估理论与实践的结合需要进一步推进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pflege
Pflege NURSING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pflege ist die erste unabhängige wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für die Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege im deutschen Sprachbereich. Sie trägt zur Entwicklung der Pflegewissenschaft sowie zur Qualität der Pflege in der Praxis bei. Die Zeitschrift versteht sich als umfassendes Forum, in welchem die sich rasch entwickelnden Bereiche der Pflegeforschung, -theorie und -praxis sowie der Ausbildung, des Managements, der Ethik, Geschichte und Politik der Pflege diskutiert werden können. Zusammenfassungen von Forschungsberichten und Mitteilungen aus der internationalen Pflegeszene, Buchbesprechungen und der internationale Kongresskalender ermöglichen der Leserschaft, sich einen Überblick über das aktuelle Geschehen zu verschaffen, sich bezüglich berufsspezifischer Literatur auf dem Laufenden zu halten, um somit die Weiterbildung gezielt zu gestalten. Pflege publiziert Beiträge, die eine hohe Relevanz für Praxis, Forschung, Theorie, Ausbildung, Ethik, Geschichte, Politik und das Management in der Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum haben. Manuskripte ohne Bezug zur Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum werden abgelehnt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信