Repeat Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Neuroendocrine Tumors: A NET Center of Excellence Experience.

IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1007/s12029-024-01065-z
Udhayvir S Grewal, Bradley T Loeffler, Alexander Paschke, Joseph S Dillon, Chandrikha Chandrasekharan
{"title":"Repeat Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Neuroendocrine Tumors: A NET Center of Excellence Experience.","authors":"Udhayvir S Grewal, Bradley T Loeffler, Alexander Paschke, Joseph S Dillon, Chandrikha Chandrasekharan","doi":"10.1007/s12029-024-01065-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The available data for the safety and efficacy of repeat peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) are almost exclusively from European centers. We present an updated experience with repeat PRRT in a cohort of US patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) at our NET center of excellence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used our single-center longitudinal NET registry to identify patients who had been previously treated with at least one dose of PRRT (PRRT 1, either <sup>177</sup>Lu DOTATATE or <sup>90</sup>Y DOTATOC) and following radiographic disease progression were re-treated with a second course of PRRT (PRRT 2). We reviewed patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, objective response rates, and toxicities after PRRT 1 and PRRT 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 patients were included in the analysis. 45.5% (5/11) of patients received <sup>177</sup>Lu DOTATATE PRRT only, both for PRRT1 and PRRT 2, while 54.5% (6/11) of patients received <sup>90</sup>Y DOTATOC PRRT for PRRT1. At first restaging scan after PRRT2 (3-6 months), 18.2% (2/11), 36.4% (4/11), and 27.3% (3/11) of patients had PR, SD, and PD, respectively; 2/11 patients (18.2%) died before the first restaging scan. Therefore, 5/11 (45.5%) patients were noted to have disease progression. Median PFS for PRRT1 was 25.4 months and median PFS for PRRT2 was 13.1 months (p = 0.0001). We did not find a statistically significant difference between the occurrence of short and long-term hematological toxicities as well as renal toxicity after PRRT1 and PRRT2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We show that repeat PRRT may benefit select patients and have an acceptable safety profile. In our cohort, PFS was significantly lower after PRRT2 as compared to PRRT1.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-024-01065-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The available data for the safety and efficacy of repeat peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) are almost exclusively from European centers. We present an updated experience with repeat PRRT in a cohort of US patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) at our NET center of excellence.

Methods: We used our single-center longitudinal NET registry to identify patients who had been previously treated with at least one dose of PRRT (PRRT 1, either 177Lu DOTATATE or 90Y DOTATOC) and following radiographic disease progression were re-treated with a second course of PRRT (PRRT 2). We reviewed patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, objective response rates, and toxicities after PRRT 1 and PRRT 2.

Results: A total of 11 patients were included in the analysis. 45.5% (5/11) of patients received 177Lu DOTATATE PRRT only, both for PRRT1 and PRRT 2, while 54.5% (6/11) of patients received 90Y DOTATOC PRRT for PRRT1. At first restaging scan after PRRT2 (3-6 months), 18.2% (2/11), 36.4% (4/11), and 27.3% (3/11) of patients had PR, SD, and PD, respectively; 2/11 patients (18.2%) died before the first restaging scan. Therefore, 5/11 (45.5%) patients were noted to have disease progression. Median PFS for PRRT1 was 25.4 months and median PFS for PRRT2 was 13.1 months (p = 0.0001). We did not find a statistically significant difference between the occurrence of short and long-term hematological toxicities as well as renal toxicity after PRRT1 and PRRT2.

Conclusion: We show that repeat PRRT may benefit select patients and have an acceptable safety profile. In our cohort, PFS was significantly lower after PRRT2 as compared to PRRT1.

神经内分泌肿瘤的重复肽受体放射性核素疗法:NET卓越中心的经验。
简介关于重复肽受体放射性核素治疗(PRRT)安全性和有效性的现有数据几乎全部来自欧洲中心。我们介绍了我们的NET卓越中心对美国神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)患者进行重复PRRT治疗的最新经验:我们利用我们的单中心纵向NET登记册确定了先前至少接受过一次PRRT治疗(PRRT 1,177Lu DOTATATE或90Y DOTATOC),并在放射学疾病进展后接受了第二次PRRT治疗(PRRT 2)的患者。我们回顾了患者、肿瘤和治疗特征、客观反应率以及 PRRT 1 和 PRRT 2 后的毒性反应:共有 11 例患者纳入分析。45.5%(5/11)的患者在 PRRT1 和 PRRT2 中均只接受了 177Lu DOTATATE PRRT,54.5%(6/11)的患者在 PRRT1 中接受了 90Y DOTATOC PRRT。在 PRRT2(3-6 个月)后的首次重新分期扫描中,分别有 18.2%(2/11)、36.4%(4/11)和 27.3%(3/11)的患者出现 PR、SD 和 PD;2/11 患者(18.2%)在首次重新分期扫描前死亡。因此,5/11(45.5%)名患者的病情出现进展。PRRT1 的中位生存期为 25.4 个月,PRRT2 的中位生存期为 13.1 个月(P = 0.0001)。我们没有发现 PRRT1 和 PRRT2 发生的短期和长期血液毒性以及肾毒性之间存在统计学意义上的显著差异:我们的研究结果表明,重复 PRRT 可使部分患者获益,并且具有可接受的安全性。在我们的队列中,与 PRRT1 相比,PRRT2 的 PFS 明显较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology:  This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信