Survival and inferential analysis in patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent sentinel lymph node biopsy: prospective single-center study.

Johanna Marcela Espejo Niño
{"title":"Survival and inferential analysis in patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent sentinel lymph node biopsy: prospective single-center study.","authors":"Johanna Marcela Espejo Niño","doi":"10.1186/s41824-024-00202-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lymph node staging is the major prognostic factor in breast cancer patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) allows an exactly axillar staging in patients with early disease, but not in locally advance breast cancer (LABC). Our aim was to study, the feasibility and accuracy of the SLNB technique with and without axillar lymphadenectomy (LDN) and with lymph node clipping after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), in patients with LABC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with LABC, scheduled for NAC and subsequent surgery and SLNB. Subsequently the patients were scheduled for adjuvant chemotherapy/hormonotherapy and radiotherapy according with the postsurgical results. Main end points were overall survival (OS) disease-free survival (DFS), mortality, SLNB identification rate (IR), sensitivity, false negative rate (FNR) of SLNB versus LDN, negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our IR with different techniques was between 89.9 and 100%. OS was between 89 and 97%. DFS was between 89.8 and 96.8%. Sensitivity was between 75 and 100%. NPV was between 89.6 and 100%. FNR was between 0 and 25%; and accuracy was between 66 and 72%. We found that survival was lower (p < 0.05) in patients with triple negative and Luminal B/HER2 intrinsic subtype; with progression or major partial response in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) results at the end of NAC and in patients with BRCA1/2 mutation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study presents excellent results of SLNB alone in patients with LABC with complete nodal response with an OS and DFS > 95%. The FNR is very high in partial responders, so we cannot recommend the SLNB alone in LABC. We recommend, in cN+ patients, axillar clipping, SLNB and LDN because in more than 50% of the patients with axillar clipping, this was not found, and because in 36% of the patients with negative LDN, the SLN (Sentinel Lymph Node) obtained was the only positive node, so these techniques together decrease the FNR and improve the node staging, OS and DFS. This study is the first prospective study that assess OS and DFS in patients with LABC, all submitted to SLNB.</p>","PeriodicalId":519909,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI reports","volume":"8 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11109070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-024-00202-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The lymph node staging is the major prognostic factor in breast cancer patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) allows an exactly axillar staging in patients with early disease, but not in locally advance breast cancer (LABC). Our aim was to study, the feasibility and accuracy of the SLNB technique with and without axillar lymphadenectomy (LDN) and with lymph node clipping after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), in patients with LABC.

Patients and methods: Patients diagnosed with LABC, scheduled for NAC and subsequent surgery and SLNB. Subsequently the patients were scheduled for adjuvant chemotherapy/hormonotherapy and radiotherapy according with the postsurgical results. Main end points were overall survival (OS) disease-free survival (DFS), mortality, SLNB identification rate (IR), sensitivity, false negative rate (FNR) of SLNB versus LDN, negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy.

Results: Our IR with different techniques was between 89.9 and 100%. OS was between 89 and 97%. DFS was between 89.8 and 96.8%. Sensitivity was between 75 and 100%. NPV was between 89.6 and 100%. FNR was between 0 and 25%; and accuracy was between 66 and 72%. We found that survival was lower (p < 0.05) in patients with triple negative and Luminal B/HER2 intrinsic subtype; with progression or major partial response in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) results at the end of NAC and in patients with BRCA1/2 mutation.

Conclusions: Our study presents excellent results of SLNB alone in patients with LABC with complete nodal response with an OS and DFS > 95%. The FNR is very high in partial responders, so we cannot recommend the SLNB alone in LABC. We recommend, in cN+ patients, axillar clipping, SLNB and LDN because in more than 50% of the patients with axillar clipping, this was not found, and because in 36% of the patients with negative LDN, the SLN (Sentinel Lymph Node) obtained was the only positive node, so these techniques together decrease the FNR and improve the node staging, OS and DFS. This study is the first prospective study that assess OS and DFS in patients with LABC, all submitted to SLNB.

接受新辅助化疗和前哨淋巴结活检的局部晚期乳腺癌患者的生存率和推论分析:前瞻性单中心研究。
背景:淋巴结分期是乳腺癌患者的主要预后因素:淋巴结分期是乳腺癌患者的主要预后因素。前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)可对早期乳腺癌患者进行精确的腋窝分期,但对局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)则无效。我们的目的是研究在对 LABC 患者进行腋窝淋巴结切除术(LDN)和新辅助化疗(NAC)后进行淋巴结切除术的情况下,前哨淋巴结活检技术的可行性和准确性:确诊为 LABC 的患者,计划接受 NAC 和后续手术及 SLNB。随后,根据术后结果安排患者接受辅助化疗/激素治疗和放疗。主要终点为总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)、死亡率、SLNB识别率(IR)、敏感性、SLNB与LDN相比的假阴性率(FNR)、阴性预测值(NPV)和总体准确性:不同技术的IR值介于89.9%和100%之间,OS值介于89%和97%之间。OS 在 89% 和 97% 之间。DFS 为 89.8% 至 96.8%。灵敏度介于 75% 和 100% 之间。NPV介于89.6和100%之间。FNR介于0和25%之间;准确率介于66和72%之间。我们发现,存活率较低(P 结论:SLN 的存活率较高:我们的研究显示,对 LABC 完全结节反应患者进行单纯 SLNB 的效果非常好,OS 和 DFS 均大于 95%。部分应答者的 FNR 非常高,因此我们不能推荐 LABC 患者单纯进行 SLNB。对于 cN+ 患者,我们建议采用腋窝剪切、SLNB 和 LDN,因为在 50% 以上的腋窝剪切患者中没有发现这种情况,而且在 36% 的 LDN 阴性患者中,获得的 SLN(前哨淋巴结)是唯一的阳性结节,因此这些技术一起使用可降低 FNR,改善结节分期、OS 和 DFS。本研究是第一项对所有接受 SLNB 的 LABC 患者的 OS 和 DFS 进行评估的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信