Final Results of RIGHT Choice: Ribociclib Plus Endocrine Therapy Versus Combination Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Women With Clinically Aggressive Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer.

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-10 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1200/JCO.24.00144
Yen-Shen Lu, Eznal Izwadi Bin Mohd Mahidin, Hamdy Azim, Yesim Eralp, Yoon Sim Yap, Seock-Ah Im, Julie Rihani, Erhan Gokmen, Ahmed El Bastawisy, Nuri Karadurmus, Yueh Ni Lim, Chun Sen Lim, Le Thanh Duc, Wei-Pang Chung, K Govind Babu, Konstantin Penkov, James Bowles, Teresa Delgar Alfaro, Jiwen Wu, Melissa Gao, Khemaies Slimane, Nagi S El Saghir
{"title":"Final Results of RIGHT Choice: Ribociclib Plus Endocrine Therapy Versus Combination Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Women With Clinically Aggressive Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer.","authors":"Yen-Shen Lu, Eznal Izwadi Bin Mohd Mahidin, Hamdy Azim, Yesim Eralp, Yoon Sim Yap, Seock-Ah Im, Julie Rihani, Erhan Gokmen, Ahmed El Bastawisy, Nuri Karadurmus, Yueh Ni Lim, Chun Sen Lim, Le Thanh Duc, Wei-Pang Chung, K Govind Babu, Konstantin Penkov, James Bowles, Teresa Delgar Alfaro, Jiwen Wu, Melissa Gao, Khemaies Slimane, Nagi S El Saghir","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.00144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A head-to-head comparison of efficacy between a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy (ET) versus combination chemotherapy (CT) has never been reported in patients with clinically aggressive hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II trial, pre/perimenopausal women with clinically aggressive HR+/HER2- ABC were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line ribociclib (600 mg once daily; 3 weeks on, 1 week off) plus letrozole/anastrozole and goserelin or investigator's choice of combination CT (docetaxel plus capecitabine, paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, or capecitabine plus vinorelbine). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 222 patients randomly assigned to ribociclib plus ET (n = 112) or combination CT (n = 110), 150 (67.6%) had symptomatic visceral metastases, 41 (18.5%) had rapid disease progression per investigator's judgment, and 31 (14.0%) had symptomatic nonvisceral disease. Overall, 106 (47.7%) patients had investigator-assessed visceral crisis. The median follow-up time was 37.0 months. At data cutoff, 31.3% (ribociclib arm) and 15.5% (CT arm) of patients had completed study treatment and transitioned to post-trial access. The median PFS was 21.8 months (ribociclib plus ET; [95% CI, 17.4 to 26.7]) and 12.8 months (combination CT; [95% CI, 10.1 to 18.4); hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.87]; <i>P</i> = .003. The overall response rates and the median time to response in the ribociclib versus CT arms, respectively, were 66.1% and 61.8% and 4.9 months and 3.2 months (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.06]). Lower rates of symptomatic adverse events were observed in the ribociclib versus CT arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>First-line ribociclib plus ET showed a significant PFS benefit, similar response rates, and better tolerability over combination CT in patients with clinically aggressive HR+/HER2- ABC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00144","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A head-to-head comparison of efficacy between a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy (ET) versus combination chemotherapy (CT) has never been reported in patients with clinically aggressive hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC).

Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II trial, pre/perimenopausal women with clinically aggressive HR+/HER2- ABC were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line ribociclib (600 mg once daily; 3 weeks on, 1 week off) plus letrozole/anastrozole and goserelin or investigator's choice of combination CT (docetaxel plus capecitabine, paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, or capecitabine plus vinorelbine). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: Among 222 patients randomly assigned to ribociclib plus ET (n = 112) or combination CT (n = 110), 150 (67.6%) had symptomatic visceral metastases, 41 (18.5%) had rapid disease progression per investigator's judgment, and 31 (14.0%) had symptomatic nonvisceral disease. Overall, 106 (47.7%) patients had investigator-assessed visceral crisis. The median follow-up time was 37.0 months. At data cutoff, 31.3% (ribociclib arm) and 15.5% (CT arm) of patients had completed study treatment and transitioned to post-trial access. The median PFS was 21.8 months (ribociclib plus ET; [95% CI, 17.4 to 26.7]) and 12.8 months (combination CT; [95% CI, 10.1 to 18.4); hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.87]; P = .003. The overall response rates and the median time to response in the ribociclib versus CT arms, respectively, were 66.1% and 61.8% and 4.9 months and 3.2 months (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.06]). Lower rates of symptomatic adverse events were observed in the ribociclib versus CT arm.

Conclusion: First-line ribociclib plus ET showed a significant PFS benefit, similar response rates, and better tolerability over combination CT in patients with clinically aggressive HR+/HER2- ABC.

RIGHT Choice的最终结果:临床侵袭性HR+/HER2-晚期乳腺癌绝经前妇女的Ribociclib加内分泌治疗与联合化疗对比。
目的:在临床侵袭性激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HR+/HER2-)晚期乳腺癌(ABC)患者中,从未报道过细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂加内分泌治疗(ET)与联合化疗(CT)的正面疗效比较:在这项开放标签、多中心、随机2期试验中,患有临床侵袭性HR+/HER2-乳腺癌的绝经前/绝经期妇女按1:1比例被随机分配到一线ribociclib(每天600毫克;开药3周,停药1周)加来曲唑/阿那曲唑和戈舍瑞林或研究者选择的联合CT(多西他赛加卡培他滨、紫杉醇加吉西他滨或卡培他滨加维诺瑞宾)。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS):在随机接受利波昔单抗加ET(n=112)或联合CT(n=110)治疗的222例患者中,150例(67.6%)有症状性内脏转移,41例(18.5%)根据研究者的判断疾病进展迅速,31例(14.0%)有症状性非内脏疾病。总体而言,106 名(47.7%)患者出现了研究人员评估的内脏危象。中位随访时间为 37.0 个月。数据截止时,31.3%(ribociclib治疗组)和15.5%(CT治疗组)的患者已完成研究治疗并转入试验后随访。中位 PFS 为 21.8 个月(ribociclib 加 ET;95% CI,17.4-26.7 个月)和 12.8 个月(联合 CT;95% CI,10.1-18.4 个月);危险比 [HR],0.61;95% CI,0.43-0.87;P=.003。Ribociclib治疗组与CT治疗组的总体应答率和中位应答时间分别为66.1%和61.8%,以及4.9个月和3.2个月(HR,0.76;95% CI,0.55-1.06)。利博昔单抗与CT治疗组的症状性不良事件发生率较低:结论:对于临床侵袭性HR+/HER2-ABC患者,一线瑞博西尼加ET比联合CT具有显著的PFS获益、相似的反应率和更好的耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信