Machine learning evaluation of inequities and disparities associated with nurse sensitive indicator safety events.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Erika R Georgantes, Fatma Gunturkun, T J McGreevy, Mary E Lough
{"title":"Machine learning evaluation of inequities and disparities associated with nurse sensitive indicator safety events.","authors":"Erika R Georgantes, Fatma Gunturkun, T J McGreevy, Mary E Lough","doi":"10.1111/jnu.12983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To use machine learning to examine health equity and clinical outcomes in patients who experienced a nurse sensitive indicator (NSI) event, defined as a fall, a hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) or a hospital-acquired infection (HAI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective observational study from a single academic hospital over six calendar years (2016-2021). Machine learning was used to examine patients with an NSI compared to those without.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Inclusion criteria: all adult inpatient admissions (2016-2021). Three approaches were used to analyze the NSI group compared to the No-NSI group. In the univariate analysis, descriptive statistics, and absolute standardized differences (ASDs) were employed to compare the demographics and clinical variables of patients who experienced a NSI and those who did not experience any NSIs. For the multivariate analysis, a light grading boosting machine (LightGBM) model was utilized to comprehensively examine the relationships associated with the development of an NSI. Lastly, a simulation study was conducted to quantify the strength of associations obtained from the machine learning model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 163,507 admissions, 4643 (2.8%) were associated with at least one NSI. The mean, standard deviation (SD) age was 59.5 (18.2) years, males comprised 82,397 (50.4%). Non-Hispanic White 84,760 (51.8%), non-Hispanic Black 8703 (5.3%), non-Hispanic Asian 23,368 (14.3%), non-Hispanic Other 14,284 (8.7%), and Hispanic 30,271 (18.5%). Race and ethnicity alone were not associated with occurrence of an NSI. The NSI group had a statistically significant longer length of stay (LOS), longer intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and was more likely to have an emergency admission compared to the group without an NSI. The simulation study results demonstrated that likelihood of NSI was higher in patients admitted under the major diagnostic categories (MDC) associated with circulatory, digestive, kidney/urinary tract, nervous, and infectious and parasitic disease diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, race/ethnicity was not associated with the risk of an NSI event. The risk of an NSI event was associated with emergency admission, longer LOS, longer ICU-LOS and certain MDCs (circulatory, digestive, kidney/urinary, nervous, infectious, and parasitic diagnoses).</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Machine learning methodologies provide a new mechanism to investigate NSI events through the lens of health equity/disparity. Understanding which patients are at higher risk for adverse outcomes can help hospitals improve nursing care and prevent NSI injury and harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12983","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To use machine learning to examine health equity and clinical outcomes in patients who experienced a nurse sensitive indicator (NSI) event, defined as a fall, a hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) or a hospital-acquired infection (HAI).

Design: This was a retrospective observational study from a single academic hospital over six calendar years (2016-2021). Machine learning was used to examine patients with an NSI compared to those without.

Methods: Inclusion criteria: all adult inpatient admissions (2016-2021). Three approaches were used to analyze the NSI group compared to the No-NSI group. In the univariate analysis, descriptive statistics, and absolute standardized differences (ASDs) were employed to compare the demographics and clinical variables of patients who experienced a NSI and those who did not experience any NSIs. For the multivariate analysis, a light grading boosting machine (LightGBM) model was utilized to comprehensively examine the relationships associated with the development of an NSI. Lastly, a simulation study was conducted to quantify the strength of associations obtained from the machine learning model.

Results: From 163,507 admissions, 4643 (2.8%) were associated with at least one NSI. The mean, standard deviation (SD) age was 59.5 (18.2) years, males comprised 82,397 (50.4%). Non-Hispanic White 84,760 (51.8%), non-Hispanic Black 8703 (5.3%), non-Hispanic Asian 23,368 (14.3%), non-Hispanic Other 14,284 (8.7%), and Hispanic 30,271 (18.5%). Race and ethnicity alone were not associated with occurrence of an NSI. The NSI group had a statistically significant longer length of stay (LOS), longer intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and was more likely to have an emergency admission compared to the group without an NSI. The simulation study results demonstrated that likelihood of NSI was higher in patients admitted under the major diagnostic categories (MDC) associated with circulatory, digestive, kidney/urinary tract, nervous, and infectious and parasitic disease diagnoses.

Conclusion: In this study, race/ethnicity was not associated with the risk of an NSI event. The risk of an NSI event was associated with emergency admission, longer LOS, longer ICU-LOS and certain MDCs (circulatory, digestive, kidney/urinary, nervous, infectious, and parasitic diagnoses).

Clinical relevance: Machine learning methodologies provide a new mechanism to investigate NSI events through the lens of health equity/disparity. Understanding which patients are at higher risk for adverse outcomes can help hospitals improve nursing care and prevent NSI injury and harm.

对与护士敏感指标安全事件相关的不公平和差异进行机器学习评估。
目的:利用机器学习研究经历过护士敏感指标(NSI)事件(定义为跌倒、医院获得性压力损伤(HAPI)或医院获得性感染(HAI))的患者的健康公平和临床结果:这是一项回顾性观察研究,来自一家学术医院,历时六年(2016-2021 年)。方法:纳入标准:所有成人住院患者:纳入标准:所有成人住院患者(2016-2021年)。采用三种方法对 NSI 组与无 NSI 组进行比较分析。在单变量分析中,采用描述性统计和绝对标准化差异(ASD)来比较经历过 NSI 和未经历过任何 NSI 的患者的人口统计学和临床变量。在多变量分析中,采用了光分级增强机(LightGBM)模型来全面研究与 NSI 发生相关的关系。最后,还进行了一项模拟研究,以量化机器学习模型得出的关联强度:在 163,507 例入院患者中,有 4643 例(2.8%)至少与一次 NSI 有关。平均年龄为59.5(18.2)岁,标准差(SD)为18.2,男性为82397人(50.4%)。非西班牙裔白人 84,760 人(51.8%),非西班牙裔黑人 8703 人(5.3%),非西班牙裔亚裔 23,368 人(14.3%),非西班牙裔其他 14,284 人(8.7%),西班牙裔 30,271 人(18.5%)。种族和民族本身与 NSI 的发生无关。与未发生 NSI 的组别相比,发生 NSI 的组别住院时间(LOS)和重症监护室(ICU)住院时间更长,而且更有可能紧急入院,这在统计学上具有显著意义。模拟研究结果表明,在与循环系统、消化系统、肾脏/泌尿系统、神经系统、传染病和寄生虫病诊断相关的主要诊断类别(MDC)下入院的患者发生 NSI 的可能性更高:在这项研究中,种族/民族与发生 NSI 事件的风险无关。NSI事件的风险与急诊入院、较长的LOS、较长的ICU-LOS和某些MDCs(循环系统、消化系统、肾/泌尿系统、神经系统、传染病和寄生虫病诊断)相关:临床相关性:机器学习方法提供了一种新的机制,可从健康公平/差异的角度来调查 NSI 事件。了解哪些患者发生不良后果的风险较高,有助于医院改善护理并预防 NSI 伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信