Gloria Iacoboni, Josu Iraola-Truchuelo, Maeve O'Reilly, Víctor Navarro, Tobias Menne, Mi Kwon, Ana África Martín-López, Sridhar Chaganti, Javier Delgado, Claire Roddie, Ariadna Pérez, Jane Norman, Manuel Guerreiro, Adam Gibb, Ana Carolina Caballero, Caroline Besley, Nuria Martínez-Cibrián, Alberto Mussetti, Robin Sanderson, Hugo Luzardo, Sunil Iyengar, Jose Maria Sánchez, Ceri Jones, Juan-Manuel Sancho, Pere Barba, Anne-Louise Latif, Lucia López-Corral, Rafael Hernani, Juan Luis Reguera, Anna Sureda, Alejandro Martin Garcia-Sancho, Mariana Bastos, Pau Abrisqueta, Andrea Kuhnl
{"title":"Treatment outcomes in patients with large B-cell lymphoma after progression to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy","authors":"Gloria Iacoboni, Josu Iraola-Truchuelo, Maeve O'Reilly, Víctor Navarro, Tobias Menne, Mi Kwon, Ana África Martín-López, Sridhar Chaganti, Javier Delgado, Claire Roddie, Ariadna Pérez, Jane Norman, Manuel Guerreiro, Adam Gibb, Ana Carolina Caballero, Caroline Besley, Nuria Martínez-Cibrián, Alberto Mussetti, Robin Sanderson, Hugo Luzardo, Sunil Iyengar, Jose Maria Sánchez, Ceri Jones, Juan-Manuel Sancho, Pere Barba, Anne-Louise Latif, Lucia López-Corral, Rafael Hernani, Juan Luis Reguera, Anna Sureda, Alejandro Martin Garcia-Sancho, Mariana Bastos, Pau Abrisqueta, Andrea Kuhnl","doi":"10.1002/hem3.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over 60% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients who receive chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells will experience disease progression. There is no standard next line of therapy and information in this setting is scarce and heterogeneous. We analyzed 387 R/R LBCL patients who progressed after CAR T cells from July 2018 until March 2022 in Spain and the United Kingdom. Median overall survival (OS) was 5.3 months, with significant differences according to the interval between infusion and progression (<2 months [1.9 months], 2–6 months [5.2 months], and >6 months [not reached]). After progression, 237 (61%) patients received treatment. Focusing on the first subsequent therapy, overall (complete) response rates were 67% (38%) for polatuzumab–bendamustine–rituximab (POLA), 51% (36%) for bispecific antibodies (BsAb), 45% (35%) for radiotherapy (RT), 33% (26%) for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), 25% (0%) for lenalidomide (LENA), and 25% (14%) for chemotherapy (CT). In terms of survival, 12-month progression-free survival and OS was 36.2% and 51.0% for POLA, 32.0% and 50.1% for BsAb, 30.8% and 37.5% for RT, 29.9% and 27.8% for ICI, 7.3% and 20.8% for LENA, and 6.1% and 18.3% for CT. Thirty-two (14%) patients received an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant with median OS not reached after a median follow-up of 15.1 months. In conclusion, patients with R/R LBCL who progress within the first 2 months after CAR T-cell therapy have dismal outcomes. Novel targeted agents, such as polatuzumab and BsAbs, can achieve prolonged survival after CAR T-cell therapy failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hem3.62","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HemaSphere","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hem3.62","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over 60% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients who receive chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells will experience disease progression. There is no standard next line of therapy and information in this setting is scarce and heterogeneous. We analyzed 387 R/R LBCL patients who progressed after CAR T cells from July 2018 until March 2022 in Spain and the United Kingdom. Median overall survival (OS) was 5.3 months, with significant differences according to the interval between infusion and progression (<2 months [1.9 months], 2–6 months [5.2 months], and >6 months [not reached]). After progression, 237 (61%) patients received treatment. Focusing on the first subsequent therapy, overall (complete) response rates were 67% (38%) for polatuzumab–bendamustine–rituximab (POLA), 51% (36%) for bispecific antibodies (BsAb), 45% (35%) for radiotherapy (RT), 33% (26%) for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), 25% (0%) for lenalidomide (LENA), and 25% (14%) for chemotherapy (CT). In terms of survival, 12-month progression-free survival and OS was 36.2% and 51.0% for POLA, 32.0% and 50.1% for BsAb, 30.8% and 37.5% for RT, 29.9% and 27.8% for ICI, 7.3% and 20.8% for LENA, and 6.1% and 18.3% for CT. Thirty-two (14%) patients received an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant with median OS not reached after a median follow-up of 15.1 months. In conclusion, patients with R/R LBCL who progress within the first 2 months after CAR T-cell therapy have dismal outcomes. Novel targeted agents, such as polatuzumab and BsAbs, can achieve prolonged survival after CAR T-cell therapy failure.
在接受嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞治疗的复发/难治(R/R)大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者中,60% 以上的患者会出现疾病进展。目前还没有标准的下一步治疗方案,有关这种情况的信息非常稀少,而且各不相同。我们分析了2018年7月至2022年3月在西班牙和英国接受CAR T细胞治疗后病情进展的387例R/R LBCL患者。中位总生存期(OS)为5.3个月,根据输注与病情进展之间的间隔(<2个月[1.9个月]、2-6个月[5.2个月]和>6个月[未达到])存在显著差异。病情恶化后,237 名(61%)患者接受了治疗。就首次后续治疗而言,波拉珠单抗-本胺嘧啶-利妥昔单抗(POLA)的总体(完全)应答率为67%(38%),双特异性抗体(BsAb)为51%(36%),放疗(RT)为45%(35%),免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)为33%(26%),来那度胺(LENA)为25%(0%),化疗(CT)为25%(14%)。在生存率方面,POLA的12个月无进展生存率和OS分别为36.2%和51.0%,BsAb为32.0%和50.1%,RT为30.8%和37.5%,ICI为29.9%和27.8%,LENA为7.3%和20.8%,CT为6.1%和18.3%。32例(14%)患者接受了异基因造血细胞移植,中位随访时间为15.1个月,但未达到中位OS。总之,R/R LBCL 患者在接受 CAR T 细胞治疗后的头 2 个月内病情恶化,预后很差。新型靶向药物,如 polatuzumab 和 BsAbs,可以延长 CAR T 细胞疗法失败后的生存期。
期刊介绍:
HemaSphere, as a publication, is dedicated to disseminating the outcomes of profoundly pertinent basic, translational, and clinical research endeavors within the field of hematology. The journal actively seeks robust studies that unveil novel discoveries with significant ramifications for hematology.
In addition to original research, HemaSphere features review articles and guideline articles that furnish lucid synopses and discussions of emerging developments, along with recommendations for patient care.
Positioned as the foremost resource in hematology, HemaSphere augments its offerings with specialized sections like HemaTopics and HemaPolicy. These segments engender insightful dialogues covering a spectrum of hematology-related topics, including digestible summaries of pivotal articles, updates on new therapies, deliberations on European policy matters, and other noteworthy news items within the field. Steering the course of HemaSphere are Editor in Chief Jan Cools and Deputy Editor in Chief Claire Harrison, alongside the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board comprising international luminaries in both research and clinical realms, each representing diverse areas of hematologic expertise.