Transarterial embolization to treat a massive hemothorax during mechanical circulatory support via puncturing of the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit.

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ryota Tsushima, Takaaki Maruhashi, Yutaro Kurihara, Takehiro Hashikata, Yasushi Asari
{"title":"Transarterial embolization to treat a massive hemothorax during mechanical circulatory support via puncturing of the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit.","authors":"Ryota Tsushima, Takaaki Maruhashi, Yutaro Kurihara, Takehiro Hashikata, Yasushi Asari","doi":"10.1186/s42155-024-00460-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for patients with cardiogenic shock that is refractory to medical therapy. Bleeding is the most common complication of MCS. Transarterial embolization (TAE) is often performed to treat this complication, because it is a less invasive hemostatic procedure. However, the TAE option needs to be carefully considered during MCS, as the access route may be limited during MCS.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A man in his 70 s was diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention via venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and Impella. During treatment in the intensive care unit, he suffered damage to a branch of the internal thoracic artery during a cardiac drainage procedure, which was subsequently treated via emergency TAE. An ECMO return cannula and an Impella sheath were inserted into the patient's right and left femoral arteries, respectively. An approach from the left brachial artery was selected, and the left internal thoracic artery was embolized. Subsequently, the patient required re-intervention to treat re-bleeding from another artery. Because it was difficult to target the target artery from the brachial one, owing to interference from the Impella catheter, the ECMO circuit near the return cannula was punctured and a guiding sheath was inserted. The ECMO flow and the patient's blood pressure decreased following placement of this guiding sheath. We were thus able to maintain the patient's blood pressure by increasing the infusion fluids and Impella flow, and embolize the target artery using a gelatin sponge to achieve hemostasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When TAE is difficult to perform during MCS using an approach from the upper extremities, a lower extremity approach with a sheath inserted into the ECMO circuit may represent a viable alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":52351,"journal":{"name":"CVIR Endovascular","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CVIR Endovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-024-00460-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for patients with cardiogenic shock that is refractory to medical therapy. Bleeding is the most common complication of MCS. Transarterial embolization (TAE) is often performed to treat this complication, because it is a less invasive hemostatic procedure. However, the TAE option needs to be carefully considered during MCS, as the access route may be limited during MCS.

Case presentation: A man in his 70 s was diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention via venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and Impella. During treatment in the intensive care unit, he suffered damage to a branch of the internal thoracic artery during a cardiac drainage procedure, which was subsequently treated via emergency TAE. An ECMO return cannula and an Impella sheath were inserted into the patient's right and left femoral arteries, respectively. An approach from the left brachial artery was selected, and the left internal thoracic artery was embolized. Subsequently, the patient required re-intervention to treat re-bleeding from another artery. Because it was difficult to target the target artery from the brachial one, owing to interference from the Impella catheter, the ECMO circuit near the return cannula was punctured and a guiding sheath was inserted. The ECMO flow and the patient's blood pressure decreased following placement of this guiding sheath. We were thus able to maintain the patient's blood pressure by increasing the infusion fluids and Impella flow, and embolize the target artery using a gelatin sponge to achieve hemostasis.

Conclusion: When TAE is difficult to perform during MCS using an approach from the upper extremities, a lower extremity approach with a sheath inserted into the ECMO circuit may represent a viable alternative.

通过穿刺体外膜氧合回路,经动脉栓塞治疗机械循环支持期间的大面积血胸。
背景:现行指南建议对药物治疗无效的心源性休克患者使用机械循环支持(MCS)。出血是机械循环支持最常见的并发症。由于经动脉栓塞术(TAE)是一种创伤较小的止血手术,因此通常用于治疗这种并发症。然而,在进行 MCS 时需要仔细考虑经动脉栓塞术的选择,因为在 MCS 期间通路可能会受到限制:一名 70 多岁的男子被诊断为急性心肌梗死,并通过静脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)和 Impella 接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。在重症监护室治疗期间,他的胸内动脉分支在心脏引流过程中受损,随后通过急诊 TAE 进行了治疗。ECMO 回流插管和 Impella 鞘分别插入患者的左右股动脉。选择从左肱动脉入路,对左胸内动脉进行栓塞。随后,患者需要再次介入治疗另一条动脉的再出血。由于受到 Impella 导管的干扰,很难从肱动脉锁定目标动脉,因此穿刺了回流插管附近的 ECMO 循环,并插入了一根引导鞘。放置引导鞘后,ECMO 流量和患者血压均有所下降。因此,我们能够通过增加输液和 Impella 流量来维持患者血压,并使用明胶海绵栓塞目标动脉以达到止血目的:结论:当在 MCS 期间使用上肢入路难以实施 TAE 时,将鞘插入 ECMO 循环的下肢入路可能是一种可行的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CVIR Endovascular
CVIR Endovascular Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信