Assessing the radiofrequency shielding effect of titanium mesh on diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of the twice-refocused spin-echo and Stejskal-Tanner sequences.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1007/s13246-024-01426-9
Eizaburo Imamura, Wataru Jomoto, Yasuo Takatsu, Takuya Enoki, Tsukasa Wakayama, Noriko Kotoura
{"title":"Assessing the radiofrequency shielding effect of titanium mesh on diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of the twice-refocused spin-echo and Stejskal-Tanner sequences.","authors":"Eizaburo Imamura, Wataru Jomoto, Yasuo Takatsu, Takuya Enoki, Tsukasa Wakayama, Noriko Kotoura","doi":"10.1007/s13246-024-01426-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared twice-refocused spin-echo sequence (TRSE) and Stejskal-Tanner sequence (ST) to evaluate their respective effects on the image quality of magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion-weighted imaging in the presence of radiofrequency (RF) shielding effect of titanium mesh in cranioplasty. A 1.5-T MR scanner with a Head/Neck coil 20 channels and a phantom simulating the T2 and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of the human brain were used. Imaging was performed with and without titanium mesh placed on the phantom in TRSE and ST, and normalized absolute average deviation (NAAD), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and ADC values were calculated. The NAAD values were significantly lower for TRSE than for ST in the area below the titanium mesh, and the drop rates due to titanium mesh were 14.1% for TRSE and 9.8% for ST. The DSC values were significantly lower for TRSE than for ST. The ADC values were significantly higher for TRSE than for ST without titanium mesh. The ADC values showed no significant difference between TRSE and ST with titanium mesh. The ST had a lower RF shielding effect of titanium mesh than the TRSE.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01426-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared twice-refocused spin-echo sequence (TRSE) and Stejskal-Tanner sequence (ST) to evaluate their respective effects on the image quality of magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion-weighted imaging in the presence of radiofrequency (RF) shielding effect of titanium mesh in cranioplasty. A 1.5-T MR scanner with a Head/Neck coil 20 channels and a phantom simulating the T2 and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of the human brain were used. Imaging was performed with and without titanium mesh placed on the phantom in TRSE and ST, and normalized absolute average deviation (NAAD), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and ADC values were calculated. The NAAD values were significantly lower for TRSE than for ST in the area below the titanium mesh, and the drop rates due to titanium mesh were 14.1% for TRSE and 9.8% for ST. The DSC values were significantly lower for TRSE than for ST. The ADC values were significantly higher for TRSE than for ST without titanium mesh. The ADC values showed no significant difference between TRSE and ST with titanium mesh. The ST had a lower RF shielding effect of titanium mesh than the TRSE.

Abstract Image

评估钛网对扩散加权成像的射频屏蔽效应:两次聚焦自旋回波和 Stejskal-Tanner 序列的比较研究。
本研究比较了两次聚焦自旋回波序列(TRSE)和Stejskal-Tanner序列(ST),以评估它们在颅骨成形术中钛网的射频(RF)屏蔽效应下对磁共振(MR)扩散加权成像图像质量的影响。研究使用了一台配有 20 个通道头颈线圈的 1.5-T 磁共振扫描仪和一个模拟人脑 T2 和表观扩散系数 (ADC) 值的模型。在模型上放置钛网和不放置钛网时,分别在 TRSE 和 ST 波段进行成像,并计算归一化绝对平均偏差(NAAD)、Dice 相似系数(DSC)和 ADC 值。在钛网下方区域,TRSE 的 NAAD 值明显低于 ST,钛网导致的下降率 TRSE 为 14.1%,ST 为 9.8%。TRSE 的 DSC 值明显低于 ST。TRSE 的 ADC 值明显高于不含钛网的 ST。有钛网的 TRSE 和 ST 的 ADC 值没有明显差异。ST 的钛网射频屏蔽效果低于 TRSE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信