Reporting Perinatal Substance Use to Child Protective Services: Obstetric Provider Perspectives on the Impact on Care.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of women's health Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1089/jwh.2023.0822
Joy S Kaufman, Kimberly A Yonkers, Caro Maltz, Carolyn M Friedhoff, Amalia Londoño Tobon, Amanda Mele, Madeleine Tessier-Kay, Olga Grechukhina, Heather Lipkind, Nancy Byatt, Ariadna Forray
{"title":"Reporting Perinatal Substance Use to Child Protective Services: Obstetric Provider Perspectives on the Impact on Care.","authors":"Joy S Kaufman, Kimberly A Yonkers, Caro Maltz, Carolyn M Friedhoff, Amalia Londoño Tobon, Amanda Mele, Madeleine Tessier-Kay, Olga Grechukhina, Heather Lipkind, Nancy Byatt, Ariadna Forray","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2023.0822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To understand obstetric provider perspectives on child protective services (CPS)-mandated reporting requirements and how they affect care for pregnant and postpartum patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Key informant interviews were conducted virtually with obstetricians, nurse practitioners, and social workers caring for obstetric patients (<i>n</i> = 12). Providers were asked about their experience as mandated reporters working with patients with OUD. Transcripts were independently coded by two staff, and content analysis was used to identify themes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Our analysis resulted in six thematic areas, including CPS-mandated strengths, concerns related to CPS reporting requirements, implementation of mandates, supporting patients after CPS report, communication between stakeholders, and the impact on care. Providers noted that the fear of CPS involvement causes some patients to delay or not engage in care. Other patients are hesitant to accept medications for OUD for fear of CPS involvement. The inconsistencies in how reporting mandates are applied and how CPS handles cases make communication about the policies challenging for providers and create anxiety for patients. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The results of this study indicate that mandated reporting requirements and the potential for CPS involvement are perceived to have minimal positive effects on perinatal individuals with OUD and may negatively affect patients and their care. <b><i>Clinicaltrials.gov number:</i></b> NCT04240392.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":"1501-1508"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.0822","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To understand obstetric provider perspectives on child protective services (CPS)-mandated reporting requirements and how they affect care for pregnant and postpartum patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Methods: Key informant interviews were conducted virtually with obstetricians, nurse practitioners, and social workers caring for obstetric patients (n = 12). Providers were asked about their experience as mandated reporters working with patients with OUD. Transcripts were independently coded by two staff, and content analysis was used to identify themes. Results: Our analysis resulted in six thematic areas, including CPS-mandated strengths, concerns related to CPS reporting requirements, implementation of mandates, supporting patients after CPS report, communication between stakeholders, and the impact on care. Providers noted that the fear of CPS involvement causes some patients to delay or not engage in care. Other patients are hesitant to accept medications for OUD for fear of CPS involvement. The inconsistencies in how reporting mandates are applied and how CPS handles cases make communication about the policies challenging for providers and create anxiety for patients. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that mandated reporting requirements and the potential for CPS involvement are perceived to have minimal positive effects on perinatal individuals with OUD and may negatively affect patients and their care. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT04240392.

向儿童保护服务机构报告围产期药物使用情况:产科医生对护理影响的看法。
目的:了解产科医疗服务提供者对儿童保护服务 (CPS) 强制报告要求的看法,以及这些要求如何影响对患有阿片类药物使用障碍 (OUD) 的孕妇和产后患者的护理。方法:对产科医生、执业护士和护理产科病人的社会工作者(n = 12)进行了虚拟关键信息访谈。询问了医疗服务提供者作为法定报告人与 OUD 患者打交道的经历。访谈记录由两名工作人员独立编码,并通过内容分析确定主题。结果:我们的分析得出了六个主题领域,包括 CPS 强制报告的优势、与 CPS 报告要求相关的担忧、强制报告的实施、CPS 报告后对患者的支持、利益相关者之间的沟通以及对护理的影响。医疗服务提供者指出,对 CPS 介入的恐惧导致一些患者推迟或不参与护理。还有一些患者因为害怕 CPS 的介入而迟迟不愿接受治疗 OUD 的药物。在如何执行报告任务和 CPS 如何处理案件方面存在的不一致,使得医疗服务提供者在政策沟通方面面临挑战,并给患者带来焦虑。结论:本研究结果表明,强制报告要求和 CPS 参与的可能性被认为对患有 OUD 的围产期患者的积极影响微乎其微,并可能对患者及其护理产生负面影响。Clinicaltrials.gov 编号:NCT04240392:NCT04240392。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of women's health
Journal of women's health 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment. Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes: -Internal Medicine Endocrinology- Cardiology- Oncology- Obstetrics/Gynecology- Urogynecology- Psychiatry- Neurology- Nutrition- Sex-Based Biology- Complementary Medicine- Sports Medicine- Surgery- Medical Education- Public Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信