A participatory foresight approach to envisioning post-pandemic urban development pathways in Tokyo

IF 6.5 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Ayyoob Sharifi , Prince Dacosta Aboagye , Mingyuan Zhang , Akito Murayama
{"title":"A participatory foresight approach to envisioning post-pandemic urban development pathways in Tokyo","authors":"Ayyoob Sharifi ,&nbsp;Prince Dacosta Aboagye ,&nbsp;Mingyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Akito Murayama","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ensuring sustainable urban futures demands varied approaches, particularly with the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, which presents a unique situation and experience for reimagining urban futures. A considerable number of scientific inquiries have adopted participatory foresight approaches to imagining sustainable urban development pathways. However, not many have used a similar approach to envision urban development pathways in a post-COVID-19 era. Based on available evidence on the impacts of COVID-19 on urban forms and lifestyles and citizens’ experiences during the pandemic, such a study is imperative to better understand how people from different demographic groups envision an ideal post-pandemic city. Using the Greater Tokyo Area as a case study, we adopted the Q methodology to determine post-pandemic urban development pathways from the subjective viewpoints of diverse stakeholders. We identified four development pathways for an ideal post-pandemic city. The first pathway is a resilient city with good neighborhood accessibility and sustainable urban regeneration. The second and third pathways, shared by younger people, focus on pro-environmental climate change mitigation (city compactness, shared mobility) and pro-urban resilience, respectively. The final pathway imagines a post-pandemic city that is accessible, safe, and smart. We found that different age groups perceive their ideal cities differently, especially when emphasizing the nexus between pandemics and cities. The study illustrates the need to adopt more participatory approaches in designing future urban development pathways since varied perspectives of an ideal city exist among different age demographics. These approaches promote equitable, inclusive, and transparent urban planning, advancing community support for policymaking and implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 103108"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397524001085","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ensuring sustainable urban futures demands varied approaches, particularly with the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, which presents a unique situation and experience for reimagining urban futures. A considerable number of scientific inquiries have adopted participatory foresight approaches to imagining sustainable urban development pathways. However, not many have used a similar approach to envision urban development pathways in a post-COVID-19 era. Based on available evidence on the impacts of COVID-19 on urban forms and lifestyles and citizens’ experiences during the pandemic, such a study is imperative to better understand how people from different demographic groups envision an ideal post-pandemic city. Using the Greater Tokyo Area as a case study, we adopted the Q methodology to determine post-pandemic urban development pathways from the subjective viewpoints of diverse stakeholders. We identified four development pathways for an ideal post-pandemic city. The first pathway is a resilient city with good neighborhood accessibility and sustainable urban regeneration. The second and third pathways, shared by younger people, focus on pro-environmental climate change mitigation (city compactness, shared mobility) and pro-urban resilience, respectively. The final pathway imagines a post-pandemic city that is accessible, safe, and smart. We found that different age groups perceive their ideal cities differently, especially when emphasizing the nexus between pandemics and cities. The study illustrates the need to adopt more participatory approaches in designing future urban development pathways since varied perspectives of an ideal city exist among different age demographics. These approaches promote equitable, inclusive, and transparent urban planning, advancing community support for policymaking and implementation.

以参与式前瞻方法展望东京大流行病后的城市发展道路
确保城市未来的可持续发展需要采取不同的方法,特别是 COVID-19 大流行病的出现,为重新构想城市未来提供了独特的情况和经验。相当多的科学研究采用了参与式展望方法来想象可持续的城市发展道路。然而,使用类似方法来设想后 COVID-19 时代城市发展道路的还不多。基于 COVID-19 对城市形态和生活方式的影响以及市民在疫情期间的经历等现有证据,为了更好地了解不同人群如何设想疫情后的理想城市,这样的研究势在必行。我们以大东京地区为案例,采用 Q 方法,从不同利益相关者的主观视角出发,确定大流行后的城市发展路径。我们确定了大流行后理想城市的四种发展途径。第一种发展途径是具有良好的社区可达性和可持续城市更新的弹性城市。第二种和第三种发展路径得到了年轻人的认同,分别侧重于有利于环境的气候变化减缓(城市紧凑性、共享流动性)和有利于城市复原力的发展。最后一条路径是想象一个无障碍、安全和智能的后流行病城市。我们发现,不同年龄段的人对理想城市的看法不同,尤其是在强调流行病与城市之间的关系时。这项研究表明,在设计未来城市发展道路时,有必要采用更具参与性的方法,因为不同年龄段的人口对理想城市的看法各不相同。这些方法可促进公平、包容和透明的城市规划,推动社区对政策制定和实施的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信