Implementing multi-trait genomic selection to improve grain milling quality in oats (Avena sativa L.).

IF 3.9 2区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Plant Genome Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-19 DOI:10.1002/tpg2.20457
Anup Dhakal, Jesse Poland, Laxman Adhikari, Ethan Faryna, Jason Fiedler, Jessica E Rutkoski, Juan David Arbelaez
{"title":"Implementing multi-trait genomic selection to improve grain milling quality in oats (Avena sativa L.).","authors":"Anup Dhakal, Jesse Poland, Laxman Adhikari, Ethan Faryna, Jason Fiedler, Jessica E Rutkoski, Juan David Arbelaez","doi":"10.1002/tpg2.20457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oats (Avena sativa L.) provide unique nutritional benefits and contribute to sustainable agricultural systems. Breeding high-value oat varieties that meet milling industry standards is crucial for satisfying the demand for oat-based food products. Test weight, thins, and groat percentage are primary traits that define oat milling quality and the final price of food-grade oats. Conventional selection for milling quality is costly and burdensome. Multi-trait genomic selection (MTGS) combines information from genome-wide markers and secondary traits genetically correlated with primary traits to predict breeding values of primary traits on candidate breeding lines. MTGS can improve prediction accuracy and significantly accelerate the rate of genetic gain. In this study, we evaluated different MTGS models that used morphometric grain traits to improve prediction accuracy for primary grain quality traits within the constraints of a breeding program. We evaluated 558 breeding lines from the University of Illinois Oat Breeding Program across 2 years for primary milling traits, test weight, thins, and groat percentage, and secondary grain morphometric traits derived from kernel and groat images. Kernel morphometric traits were genetically correlated with test weight and thins percentage but were uncorrelated with groat percentage. For test weight and thins percentage, the MTGS model that included the kernel morphometric traits in both training and candidate sets outperformed single-trait models by 52% and 59%, respectively. In contrast, MTGS models for groat percentage were not significantly better than the single-trait model. We found that incorporating kernel morphometric traits can improve the genomic selection for test weight and thins percentage.</p>","PeriodicalId":49002,"journal":{"name":"Plant Genome","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Genome","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20457","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oats (Avena sativa L.) provide unique nutritional benefits and contribute to sustainable agricultural systems. Breeding high-value oat varieties that meet milling industry standards is crucial for satisfying the demand for oat-based food products. Test weight, thins, and groat percentage are primary traits that define oat milling quality and the final price of food-grade oats. Conventional selection for milling quality is costly and burdensome. Multi-trait genomic selection (MTGS) combines information from genome-wide markers and secondary traits genetically correlated with primary traits to predict breeding values of primary traits on candidate breeding lines. MTGS can improve prediction accuracy and significantly accelerate the rate of genetic gain. In this study, we evaluated different MTGS models that used morphometric grain traits to improve prediction accuracy for primary grain quality traits within the constraints of a breeding program. We evaluated 558 breeding lines from the University of Illinois Oat Breeding Program across 2 years for primary milling traits, test weight, thins, and groat percentage, and secondary grain morphometric traits derived from kernel and groat images. Kernel morphometric traits were genetically correlated with test weight and thins percentage but were uncorrelated with groat percentage. For test weight and thins percentage, the MTGS model that included the kernel morphometric traits in both training and candidate sets outperformed single-trait models by 52% and 59%, respectively. In contrast, MTGS models for groat percentage were not significantly better than the single-trait model. We found that incorporating kernel morphometric traits can improve the genomic selection for test weight and thins percentage.

实施多性状基因组选择,提高燕麦(Avena sativa L.)的谷物研磨质量。
燕麦(Avena sativa L.)具有独特的营养价值,有助于可持续农业系统的发展。培育符合制粉行业标准的高价值燕麦品种对于满足燕麦食品的需求至关重要。测试重量、稀度和颖果率是决定燕麦碾磨质量和食品级燕麦最终价格的主要性状。传统的碾磨质量选择成本高、工作量大。多性状基因组选择(MTGS)结合了来自全基因组标记和与主要性状遗传相关的次要性状的信息,以预测候选育种品系主要性状的育种值。MTGS 可以提高预测的准确性,并显著加快遗传增益的速度。在本研究中,我们对不同的 MTGS 模型进行了评估,这些模型利用谷物形态特征来提高育种计划限制条件下对主要谷物品质性状的预测准确性。我们对伊利诺伊大学燕麦育种计划的 558 个育种品系进行了为期两年的评估,包括主要制粉性状、测试重量、稀度、禾粒百分比,以及由谷粒和禾粒图像得出的次要谷粒形态特征。谷粒形态特征与测试重量和稀薄度百分比有遗传相关性,但与糁百分比无相关性。在测试重量和稀疏度百分比方面,在训练集和候选集中都包含果仁形态特征的 MTGS 模型的表现分别比单一特征模型好 52% 和 59%。相比之下,咽喉率的 MTGS 模型并没有明显优于单一性状模型。我们发现,加入核形态特征可以改善测试重量和糙米率的基因组选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Genome
Plant Genome PLANT SCIENCES-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
93
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Plant Genome publishes original research investigating all aspects of plant genomics. Technical breakthroughs reporting improvements in the efficiency and speed of acquiring and interpreting plant genomics data are welcome. The editorial board gives preference to novel reports that use innovative genomic applications that advance our understanding of plant biology that may have applications to crop improvement. The journal also publishes invited review articles and perspectives that offer insight and commentary on recent advances in genomics and their potential for agronomic improvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信