Eleanor R Bills, Anastasia Dimopoulos, Anne Lj Burke, Kathryn L Collins, Ecushla C Linedale, Vicki Hume, Jackie Yeoh, Sharyn Coles, Mandy Nolan, Kate Southam, Lesley Thomas, Melanie Ramsey, Jane M Andrews
{"title":"Opportunities to optimise care and choice in joint replacement surgery using a digitally delivered, holistic PreHab pathway.","authors":"Eleanor R Bills, Anastasia Dimopoulos, Anne Lj Burke, Kathryn L Collins, Ecushla C Linedale, Vicki Hume, Jackie Yeoh, Sharyn Coles, Mandy Nolan, Kate Southam, Lesley Thomas, Melanie Ramsey, Jane M Andrews","doi":"10.1177/10225536241234032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the implementation and evaluation of a hospital-initiated, community-based, digital prehabilitation program (<i>My PreHab Program</i>: MPP<i>)</i> for adults referred for elective joint replacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MPP was implemented July 2022 and comprises a personalised digital health screen that guides the provision of self-management resources. Adults (<u>></u>18 years) referred and accepted, or already waitlisted, for total knee/hip replacement surgery were eligible. Individuals requiring category 1 (urgent) or emergency surgery and those without a mobile phone were excluded. Implementation and intervention outcome measures (program adoption, equity of reach, fidelity, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, engagement, preliminary surgical outcomes) were explored via study-specific measures and hospital records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of those invited (<i>N</i> = 689), 77.8% participated. Participants and non-participants were similar in key demographic variables except regional invitees were more likely to participate than metropolitan (88.0% vs 75.4%, <i>p</i> = .002) and non-participants tended to be older (median age = 69.0 vs 64.0, <i>p</i> = .005). Participants reported on average four modifiable risk factors: most commonly chronic pain (79.1%), obesity (57.3%), and frailty (40.9%). Most participants (80.4%) reviewed all resources provided and reported action/intention to address issues identified (90.9%). Participants perceived MPP as acceptable (3.2/5), appropriate (3.3/5), and feasible (3.4/5). Early trends for participants progressing to surgery (<i>n</i> = 33) show a reduced length of stay (MPP = 4.3, baseline = 5.3 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MPP demonstrated high adoption, fidelity, and participant engagement. It is acceptable, appropriate and feasible and has the potential to be scaled-up digitally at low-cost. Modifiable risk factors were prevalent and early indications suggest this preoperative intervention may benefit both patients and the healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"32 2","pages":"10225536241234032"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536241234032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the implementation and evaluation of a hospital-initiated, community-based, digital prehabilitation program (My PreHab Program: MPP) for adults referred for elective joint replacement.
Methods: MPP was implemented July 2022 and comprises a personalised digital health screen that guides the provision of self-management resources. Adults (>18 years) referred and accepted, or already waitlisted, for total knee/hip replacement surgery were eligible. Individuals requiring category 1 (urgent) or emergency surgery and those without a mobile phone were excluded. Implementation and intervention outcome measures (program adoption, equity of reach, fidelity, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, engagement, preliminary surgical outcomes) were explored via study-specific measures and hospital records.
Results: Of those invited (N = 689), 77.8% participated. Participants and non-participants were similar in key demographic variables except regional invitees were more likely to participate than metropolitan (88.0% vs 75.4%, p = .002) and non-participants tended to be older (median age = 69.0 vs 64.0, p = .005). Participants reported on average four modifiable risk factors: most commonly chronic pain (79.1%), obesity (57.3%), and frailty (40.9%). Most participants (80.4%) reviewed all resources provided and reported action/intention to address issues identified (90.9%). Participants perceived MPP as acceptable (3.2/5), appropriate (3.3/5), and feasible (3.4/5). Early trends for participants progressing to surgery (n = 33) show a reduced length of stay (MPP = 4.3, baseline = 5.3 days).
Conclusion: MPP demonstrated high adoption, fidelity, and participant engagement. It is acceptable, appropriate and feasible and has the potential to be scaled-up digitally at low-cost. Modifiable risk factors were prevalent and early indications suggest this preoperative intervention may benefit both patients and the healthcare system.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association.
The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.