Health-related quality of life after total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学
Ke Song, Liping Qi, Zongyou Mu, Houyi Sun, Shenhao Zhai, Dehua Liu, Shihao Li, Yange Luo, Peilai Liu
{"title":"Health-related quality of life after total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ke Song, Liping Qi, Zongyou Mu, Houyi Sun, Shenhao Zhai, Dehua Liu, Shihao Li, Yange Luo, Peilai Liu","doi":"10.1177/10225536241256245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While previous research has demonstrated potential advantages of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) over total knee arthroplasty (TKA), particularly in terms of clinical outcomes such as function and pain relief, the specific impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to address this gap by comparing HRQOL outcomes between UKA and TKA, providing valuable insights for clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases up to July 15, 2023. Eligible studies assessed HRQOL using EQ-5D, SF-36, or SF-12 and were assessed for methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven eligible studies were included, comprising a total of 64,585 patients with 35,809 undergoing TKA and 28,776 undergoing UKA. Patient age ranged from 52.0 to 67.7 years with an average BMI ranging from 27.2 to 31.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Follow-up periods ranged from 6 months to 10 years. Five studies (63,829 patients) that evaluated HRQOL using EQ-5D showed significantly better outcomes for UKA compared to TKA (MD -0.04, 95% CI -0.05 to -0.02). Two studies (756 patients) that evaluated HRQOL using SF-36 showed no significant difference between TKA and UKA. Five studies (63,286 patients) that evaluated functional outcomes using Oxford Knee Score (OKS) showed significantly better functional scores for UKA compared to TKA (MD -1.29, 95% CI -1.86 to -0.72). Four studies (24,570 patients) that reported patient satisfaction showed no statistically significant difference between TKA and UKA (MD 0.97, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.05). Further subgroup analysis did not affect the conclusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our meta-analysis suggests that UKA is associated with better HRQOL and knee function, as well as similar patient satisfaction, compared to TKA for patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"32 2","pages":"10225536241256245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536241256245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While previous research has demonstrated potential advantages of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) over total knee arthroplasty (TKA), particularly in terms of clinical outcomes such as function and pain relief, the specific impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to address this gap by comparing HRQOL outcomes between UKA and TKA, providing valuable insights for clinical decision-making.

Methods: We conducted a literature search in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases up to July 15, 2023. Eligible studies assessed HRQOL using EQ-5D, SF-36, or SF-12 and were assessed for methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

Results: Seven eligible studies were included, comprising a total of 64,585 patients with 35,809 undergoing TKA and 28,776 undergoing UKA. Patient age ranged from 52.0 to 67.7 years with an average BMI ranging from 27.2 to 31.0 kg/m2. Follow-up periods ranged from 6 months to 10 years. Five studies (63,829 patients) that evaluated HRQOL using EQ-5D showed significantly better outcomes for UKA compared to TKA (MD -0.04, 95% CI -0.05 to -0.02). Two studies (756 patients) that evaluated HRQOL using SF-36 showed no significant difference between TKA and UKA. Five studies (63,286 patients) that evaluated functional outcomes using Oxford Knee Score (OKS) showed significantly better functional scores for UKA compared to TKA (MD -1.29, 95% CI -1.86 to -0.72). Four studies (24,570 patients) that reported patient satisfaction showed no statistically significant difference between TKA and UKA (MD 0.97, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.05). Further subgroup analysis did not affect the conclusions.

Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests that UKA is associated with better HRQOL and knee function, as well as similar patient satisfaction, compared to TKA for patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis.

治疗单关节骨性关节炎的全膝关节置换术和单关节置换术后与健康相关的生活质量:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:尽管之前的研究表明单间室膝关节置换术(UKA)比全膝关节置换术(TKA)具有潜在优势,尤其是在功能和疼痛缓解等临床结果方面,但对健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的具体影响仍不清楚。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在通过比较 UKA 和 TKA 的 HRQOL 结果来弥补这一不足,为临床决策提供有价值的见解:我们在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane对照试验登记(CENTRAL)和Web of Science数据库中进行了文献检索,截至日期为2023年7月15日。符合条件的研究使用 EQ-5D、SF-36 或 SF-12 评估 HRQOL,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估方法学质量:结果:共纳入了七项符合条件的研究,包括64,585名患者,其中35,809名患者接受了TKA手术,28,776名患者接受了UKA手术。患者年龄从52.0岁到67.7岁不等,平均体重指数(BMI)从27.2公斤/平方米到31.0公斤/平方米不等。随访时间从 6 个月到 10 年不等。五项使用 EQ-5D 评估 HRQOL 的研究(63829 名患者)显示,UKA 的疗效明显优于 TKA(MD -0.04,95% CI -0.05 至 -0.02)。使用 SF-36 评估 HRQOL 的两项研究(756 名患者)显示,TKA 和 UKA 之间没有显著差异。五项研究(63286 名患者)使用牛津膝关节评分(OKS)对功能结果进行了评估,结果显示,UKA 的功能评分明显优于 TKA(MD -1.29, 95% CI -1.86 to -0.72)。报告患者满意度的四项研究(24,570 名患者)显示,TKA 和 UKA 之间的差异无统计学意义(MD 0.97,95% CI 0.90 至 1.05)。进一步的亚组分析不会影响结论:我们的荟萃分析表明,与TKA相比,UKA能为单间室骨关节炎患者带来更好的HRQOL和膝关节功能,患者满意度也相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信