A Phenomenological Qualitative Exploration of Mind-Body Therapy Use and Effectiveness Among Young, Middle, and Older Adult Cancer Survivors.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Sarthak Singh, Tina Nguyen, Julie Deleemans, Devesh Oberoi, Katherine-Ann Piedalue, Linda E Carlson
{"title":"A Phenomenological Qualitative Exploration of Mind-Body Therapy Use and Effectiveness Among Young, Middle, and Older Adult Cancer Survivors.","authors":"Sarthak Singh, Tina Nguyen, Julie Deleemans, Devesh Oberoi, Katherine-Ann Piedalue, Linda E Carlson","doi":"10.1177/15347354241253847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Having been diagnosed with and treated for cancer can have negative psychosocial repercussions that may differ across the lifespan. Mind-body therapies (MBTs), such as tai-chi/qigong (TCQ) or mindfulness-based cancer recovery (MBCR), have shown promise in decreasing negative psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivors, but few studies have explored potential differences in MBT use and effectiveness across age groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive phenomenological qualitative design was used. Participants included young (18-39), middle (40-64), and older (65+) adult cancer survivors who were diagnosed with any type of cancer and had participated in Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR) or Tai Chi/Qigong (TCQ) MBTs. Semi-structured qualitative interviews explored participants' experiences in MBTs and these were analyzed using descriptive phenomenological analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the interviews (n = 18), young (n = 6), middle-aged (n = 8), and older (n = 4) adults participated. 5 themes emerged: influences in joining the program, unique lifestyles, positive class experiences, use of media, and program impacts. Though all age groups benefitted from MBT participation, variations between age groups with respect to the benefits received and motivations for joining the program were observed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>MBTs had beneficial physical and mental health effects on survivors of all age groups. These benefits were particularly connected to the ongoing life stresses common to each age cohort, such as relief from work and family roles for young adults or support during retirement transition for older adults. Hence, access to MBT programs may be beneficial as part of the survivorship plan for patients and the recruitment strategies or content can be adapted by MBT providers to better target and support age-specific groups. More research is required with a larger sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":13734,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","volume":"23 ","pages":"15347354241253847"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107309/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354241253847","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Having been diagnosed with and treated for cancer can have negative psychosocial repercussions that may differ across the lifespan. Mind-body therapies (MBTs), such as tai-chi/qigong (TCQ) or mindfulness-based cancer recovery (MBCR), have shown promise in decreasing negative psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivors, but few studies have explored potential differences in MBT use and effectiveness across age groups.

Methods: A descriptive phenomenological qualitative design was used. Participants included young (18-39), middle (40-64), and older (65+) adult cancer survivors who were diagnosed with any type of cancer and had participated in Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR) or Tai Chi/Qigong (TCQ) MBTs. Semi-structured qualitative interviews explored participants' experiences in MBTs and these were analyzed using descriptive phenomenological analysis.

Results: Among the interviews (n = 18), young (n = 6), middle-aged (n = 8), and older (n = 4) adults participated. 5 themes emerged: influences in joining the program, unique lifestyles, positive class experiences, use of media, and program impacts. Though all age groups benefitted from MBT participation, variations between age groups with respect to the benefits received and motivations for joining the program were observed.

Discussion: MBTs had beneficial physical and mental health effects on survivors of all age groups. These benefits were particularly connected to the ongoing life stresses common to each age cohort, such as relief from work and family roles for young adults or support during retirement transition for older adults. Hence, access to MBT programs may be beneficial as part of the survivorship plan for patients and the recruitment strategies or content can be adapted by MBT providers to better target and support age-specific groups. More research is required with a larger sample.

对青年、中年和老年癌症幸存者使用身心疗法及其效果的现象学定性探索。
背景:被诊断出患有癌症并接受治疗后,可能会产生负面的社会心理影响,这种影响在人的一生中可能会有所不同。心身疗法(MBTs),如太极拳/气功(TCQ)或正念癌症康复(MBCR),在减少癌症幸存者的负面社会心理影响方面已显示出前景,但很少有研究探讨不同年龄组在使用心身疗法及其效果方面的潜在差异:方法:采用描述性现象学定性设计。参与者包括年轻(18-39 岁)、中年(40-64 岁)和老年(65 岁以上)成年癌症幸存者,他们被诊断出患有任何类型的癌症,并参加过正念癌症康复(MBCR)或太极/气功(TCQ)MBT。半结构化定性访谈探讨了参与者在MBT中的经历,并采用描述性现象分析法对这些经历进行了分析:在访谈(n = 18)中,有年轻人(n = 6)、中年人(n = 8)和老年人(n = 4)参加。出现了 5 个主题:参加计划的影响因素、独特的生活方式、积极的课堂体验、媒体的使用和计划的影响。虽然所有年龄组都从参加 MBT 中受益,但观察到不同年龄组在获得的益处和参加计划的动机方面存在差异:讨论:医疗小组对所有年龄组的幸存者都有有益的身心健康影响。这些益处尤其与各年龄组共同面临的持续生活压力有关,例如,对年轻人来说,可以从工作和家庭角色中解脱出来,对老年人来说,可以在退休过渡期得到支持。因此,作为患者幸存者计划的一部分,参加 MBT 计划可能是有益的,MBT 提供者可以调整招募策略或内容,以更好地针对和支持特定年龄组。需要对更多的样本进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Integrative Cancer Therapies
Integrative Cancer Therapies 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ICT is the first journal to spearhead and focus on a new and growing movement in cancer treatment. The journal emphasizes scientific understanding of alternative medicine and traditional medicine therapies, and their responsible integration with conventional health care. Integrative care includes therapeutic interventions in diet, lifestyle, exercise, stress care, and nutritional supplements, as well as experimental vaccines, chrono-chemotherapy, and other advanced treatments. Contributors are leading oncologists, researchers, nurses, and health-care professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信