Association between insulin resistance and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1007/s11011-024-01347-2
Mahdi Sepidarkish, Narges Kalantari, Tahmineh Gorgani-Firouzjaee, Sahar Rostami-Mansoor, Hoda Shirafkan
{"title":"Association between insulin resistance and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mahdi Sepidarkish, Narges Kalantari, Tahmineh Gorgani-Firouzjaee, Sahar Rostami-Mansoor, Hoda Shirafkan","doi":"10.1007/s11011-024-01347-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is increasing evidence of metabolic perturbations in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, and insulin is an important parameter that has controversial effects on neurological disease. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed to explore the association between insulin resistance (IR) and MS as well as insulin levels and MS. Three electronic databases, including Medline, Scopus, and the Web of Science, were examined up to 26 May 2023 for observational studies. Two independent reviewers assessed the studies according to a pre-specified protocol. Random-effects model using a Restricted-maximum Likelihood (REML) estimator was used to meta-analyze the association between IR [assessed by Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA-IR)], insulin and MS. Eighteen datasets from 2012 to 2022 were included in this meta-analysis. The standardized mean difference (SMD) for comparison IR and insulin between MS and healthy control group as outcomes 1 and 2 were 0.78 and 0.72 respectively. Furthermore, for outcome 1, we observed a greater effect size in studies that recruited different types of MS (Mix) (SMD: 1.09) than in those that included only relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) (SMD: 0.59). The meta-analysis revealed a significant association between IR, insulin and MS, with stronger associations in studies that recruited mixed patients. However, high heterogeneity has been observed in the present study. Therefore, more studies are needed to confirm the association between these parameters and MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-024-01347-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is increasing evidence of metabolic perturbations in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, and insulin is an important parameter that has controversial effects on neurological disease. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed to explore the association between insulin resistance (IR) and MS as well as insulin levels and MS. Three electronic databases, including Medline, Scopus, and the Web of Science, were examined up to 26 May 2023 for observational studies. Two independent reviewers assessed the studies according to a pre-specified protocol. Random-effects model using a Restricted-maximum Likelihood (REML) estimator was used to meta-analyze the association between IR [assessed by Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA-IR)], insulin and MS. Eighteen datasets from 2012 to 2022 were included in this meta-analysis. The standardized mean difference (SMD) for comparison IR and insulin between MS and healthy control group as outcomes 1 and 2 were 0.78 and 0.72 respectively. Furthermore, for outcome 1, we observed a greater effect size in studies that recruited different types of MS (Mix) (SMD: 1.09) than in those that included only relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) (SMD: 0.59). The meta-analysis revealed a significant association between IR, insulin and MS, with stronger associations in studies that recruited mixed patients. However, high heterogeneity has been observed in the present study. Therefore, more studies are needed to confirm the association between these parameters and MS.

Abstract Image

胰岛素抵抗与多发性硬化症之间的关系:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
越来越多的证据表明,多发性硬化症(MS)患者体内存在代谢紊乱,而胰岛素是对神经系统疾病有争议的一个重要参数。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析研究旨在探讨胰岛素抵抗(IR)与多发性硬化症以及胰岛素水平与多发性硬化症之间的关联。研究人员在 Medline、Scopus 和 Web of Science 等三个电子数据库中检索了截至 2023 年 5 月 26 日的观察性研究。两位独立审稿人按照预先指定的方案对研究进行了评估。使用限制最大似然(REML)估计器建立随机效应模型,对IR(通过体内平衡模型评估(HOMA-IR)评估)、胰岛素和多发性硬化症之间的关联进行元分析。本次荟萃分析纳入了 2012 年至 2022 年的 18 个数据集。作为结果 1 和结果 2,多发性硬化症组与健康对照组之间的 IR 和胰岛素比较的标准化平均差(SMD)分别为 0.78 和 0.72。此外,就结果 1 而言,我们观察到纳入不同类型多发性硬化症(混合型)的研究(SMD:1.09)比仅纳入复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)的研究(SMD:0.59)具有更大的效应规模。荟萃分析表明,IR、胰岛素与多发性硬化症之间存在显著关联,在招募混合型患者的研究中关联性更强。然而,在本研究中观察到了高度异质性。因此,需要更多的研究来证实这些参数与多发性硬化症之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信