Injection Temperature Impacts on Reservoir Response during CO2 Storage

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM
SPE Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.2118/219461-pa
Mahendra Samaroo, Mark McClure, Garrett Fowler, Rick Chalaturnyk, Maurice B. Dusseault, Christopher Hawkes
{"title":"Injection Temperature Impacts on Reservoir Response during CO2 Storage","authors":"Mahendra Samaroo, Mark McClure, Garrett Fowler, Rick Chalaturnyk, Maurice B. Dusseault, Christopher Hawkes","doi":"10.2118/219461-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sustained injection of industrial-scale volumes of cold CO<sub>2</sub> into warmer subsurface rock will result in extensive cooling which can alter rock mass mechanical behavior and fluid migration characteristics. Advanced simulation tools are available to assess and characterize such phenomena; however, the effective use of these tools requires appropriate injection temperatures and rock thermophysical parameters (in addition to geomechanical and hydraulic properties). The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the sensitivity of injection-induced tensile fracturing and fault reactivation to injection temperature and reservoir thermophysical properties during CO<sub>2</sub> injection operations. This was achieved by (1) compiling and reviewing thermophysical parameter data available for formations in the province of Alberta, Canada, and CO<sub>2</sub> injection temperature records for CO<sub>2</sub> injection projects in western Canada and (2) using a 3D, physics-based, fully integrated hydraulic fracturing and reservoir simulation numerical model to examine the geomechanical response of several potential CO<sub>2</sub> reservoirs in the Alberta Basin as a function of injection temperature, thermal conductivity (TC), and coefficient of linear thermal expansion (CLTE) values. The simulation results indicate that reducing the fluid injection temperature from 15°C (assumed in previous work) to 2°C (conservative value selected based on temperature data reviewed in this work) could trigger extensive vertical (20–130 m high, 100–600 m long) tensile fractures with rapid fracture initiation and full vertical growth within short periods (weeks to months) and continued horizontal length increase. When low values for thermophysical properties are used, the results show that thermally-induced tensile fracturing is unlikely, whereas the use of high values results in extensive tensile fracturing in all simulations. A similar conclusion was reached for the thermally-induced reactivation (unclamping) of proximal, critically-stressed faults. Notably, slip is predicted for all simulations where high thermophysical property values are used. This confirms that accurate determination of minimum fluid injection temperature and thermophysical parameters is important for containment risk assessment for commercial-scale CO<sub>2</sub> storage projects. Another significant outcome of this work is the observation that most thermophysical parameters in the available data were measured using experimental conditions and/or temperature paths that are not representative of CO<sub>2</sub> injection projects. As such, the development and validation of best practice approaches for accurate assessment of these parameters seem necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":22252,"journal":{"name":"SPE Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/219461-pa","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustained injection of industrial-scale volumes of cold CO2 into warmer subsurface rock will result in extensive cooling which can alter rock mass mechanical behavior and fluid migration characteristics. Advanced simulation tools are available to assess and characterize such phenomena; however, the effective use of these tools requires appropriate injection temperatures and rock thermophysical parameters (in addition to geomechanical and hydraulic properties). The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the sensitivity of injection-induced tensile fracturing and fault reactivation to injection temperature and reservoir thermophysical properties during CO2 injection operations. This was achieved by (1) compiling and reviewing thermophysical parameter data available for formations in the province of Alberta, Canada, and CO2 injection temperature records for CO2 injection projects in western Canada and (2) using a 3D, physics-based, fully integrated hydraulic fracturing and reservoir simulation numerical model to examine the geomechanical response of several potential CO2 reservoirs in the Alberta Basin as a function of injection temperature, thermal conductivity (TC), and coefficient of linear thermal expansion (CLTE) values. The simulation results indicate that reducing the fluid injection temperature from 15°C (assumed in previous work) to 2°C (conservative value selected based on temperature data reviewed in this work) could trigger extensive vertical (20–130 m high, 100–600 m long) tensile fractures with rapid fracture initiation and full vertical growth within short periods (weeks to months) and continued horizontal length increase. When low values for thermophysical properties are used, the results show that thermally-induced tensile fracturing is unlikely, whereas the use of high values results in extensive tensile fracturing in all simulations. A similar conclusion was reached for the thermally-induced reactivation (unclamping) of proximal, critically-stressed faults. Notably, slip is predicted for all simulations where high thermophysical property values are used. This confirms that accurate determination of minimum fluid injection temperature and thermophysical parameters is important for containment risk assessment for commercial-scale CO2 storage projects. Another significant outcome of this work is the observation that most thermophysical parameters in the available data were measured using experimental conditions and/or temperature paths that are not representative of CO2 injection projects. As such, the development and validation of best practice approaches for accurate assessment of these parameters seem necessary.

二氧化碳封存过程中注入温度对储层响应的影响
将工业规模的低温二氧化碳持续注入温度较高的地下岩石会导致大面积冷却,从而改变岩体的机械行为和流体迁移特性。先进的模拟工具可用于评估和描述此类现象;然而,要有效使用这些工具,需要适当的注入温度和岩石热物理参数(以及地质力学和水力特性)。本研究的主要目的是证明在二氧化碳注入过程中,注入诱导的拉伸压裂和断层再活化对注入温度和储层热物理特性的敏感性。具体方法是:(1) 汇编和审查加拿大阿尔伯塔省地层的热物理参数数据,以及加拿大西部二氧化碳注入项目的二氧化碳注入温度记录;(2) 使用基于物理的三维全集成水力压裂和储层模拟数值模型,研究阿尔伯塔盆地几个潜在二氧化碳储层的地质力学响应与注入温度、热导率 (TC) 和线性热膨胀系数 (CLTE) 值的函数关系。模拟结果表明,将流体注入温度从 15°C(以前工作中的假设)降低到 2°C(根据本工作中审查的温度数据选择的保守值)可引发大范围垂直(20-130 米高,100-600 米长)拉伸裂缝,裂缝在短期内(几周到几个月)迅速形成并完全垂直生长,水平长度持续增加。热物理性质数值较低时,结果表明热引起的拉伸断裂不太可能发生,而数值较高时,在所有模拟中都会出现大面积拉伸断裂。对于近端严重受压断层的热诱导重新激活(解闭)也得出了类似的结论。值得注意的是,在使用高热物理特性值的所有模拟中都预测到了滑移。这证明,准确确定最低流体注入温度和热物理参数对于商业规模二氧化碳封存项目的封存风险评估非常重要。这项工作的另一个重要成果是发现,现有数据中的大多数热物理参数都是在不代表二氧化碳注入项目的实验条件和/或温度路径下测量的。因此,似乎有必要开发和验证准确评估这些参数的最佳实践方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SPE Journal
SPE Journal 工程技术-工程:石油
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
229
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Covers theories and emerging concepts spanning all aspects of engineering for oil and gas exploration and production, including reservoir characterization, multiphase flow, drilling dynamics, well architecture, gas well deliverability, numerical simulation, enhanced oil recovery, CO2 sequestration, and benchmarking and performance indicators.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信