Despite Absolute Information Advantages, All Investors Incur Welfare Loss

Zongxia Liang, Qi Ye
{"title":"Despite Absolute Information Advantages, All Investors Incur Welfare Loss","authors":"Zongxia Liang, Qi Ye","doi":"arxiv-2405.08822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper delves into financial markets that incorporate a novel form of\nheterogeneity among investors, specifically in terms of their beliefs regarding\nthe reliability of signals in the business cycle economy model, which may be\nbiased. Unlike most papers in this field, we not only analyze the equilibrium\nbut also examine welfare using objective measures while investors aim to\nmaximize their utility based on subjective measures. Furthermore, we introduce\npassive investors and use their utility as a benchmark, thereby revealing the\nphenomenon of double loss sometimes. In the analysis, we examine two effects:\nthe distortion effect on total welfare and the advantage effect of information\nand highlight their key factors of influence, with a particular emphasis on the\nproportion of investors. We also demonstrate that manipulating investors'\nestimation towards the economy can be a way to improve utility and identify an\ninner connection between welfare and survival.","PeriodicalId":501084,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Mathematical Finance","volume":"121 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Mathematical Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.08822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper delves into financial markets that incorporate a novel form of heterogeneity among investors, specifically in terms of their beliefs regarding the reliability of signals in the business cycle economy model, which may be biased. Unlike most papers in this field, we not only analyze the equilibrium but also examine welfare using objective measures while investors aim to maximize their utility based on subjective measures. Furthermore, we introduce passive investors and use their utility as a benchmark, thereby revealing the phenomenon of double loss sometimes. In the analysis, we examine two effects: the distortion effect on total welfare and the advantage effect of information and highlight their key factors of influence, with a particular emphasis on the proportion of investors. We also demonstrate that manipulating investors' estimation towards the economy can be a way to improve utility and identify an inner connection between welfare and survival.
尽管拥有绝对的信息优势,但所有投资者都会遭受福利损失
本文深入探讨了金融市场中投资者之间新形式的异质性,特别是他们对商业周期经济模型中信号可靠性的信念,这种信念可能是有偏差的。与该领域的大多数论文不同,我们不仅分析了均衡状态,还使用客观指标考察了福利,而投资者的目标是基于主观指标实现效用最大化。此外,我们还引入了被动投资者,并以他们的效用为基准,从而揭示了有时会出现的双重损失现象。在分析中,我们考察了两种效应:对总福利的扭曲效应和信息的优势效应,并强调了它们的关键影响因素,特别强调了投资者的比例。我们还证明,操纵投资者对经济的估计可以提高效用,并找出福利与生存之间的内在联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信