{"title":"Post‐processing output from ensembles with and without parametrised convection, to create accurate, blended, high‐fidelity rainfall forecasts","authors":"Estíbaliz Gascón, Andrea Montani, Tim D. Hewson","doi":"10.1002/qj.4753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flash flooding is a significant societal problem, but related precipitation forecasts are often poor. To address, one can try to use output from convection‐parametrising (global) ensembles, post‐processed to forecast at point‐scale, or convection‐resolving limited area ensembles. The new methodology described here combines both. We apply “ecPoint‐rainfall” post‐processing to the ECMWF global ensemble. Alongside we use 2.2 km COSMO LAM ensemble output (centred on Italy), and also post‐process that, using a scale‐selective neighbourhood approach to compensate for insufficient members and to preserve consistently forecast local details. The two resulting scale‐compatible components then undergo lead‐time‐weighted blending, to create the final probabilistic 6 h rainfall forecasts. Product creation for forecasters, in this way, constituted the “Italy Flash Flood use case” within the EU‐funded MISTRAL project; real‐time delivery of open access products is ongoing. One year of verification shows that, of the five components (2 raw, 2 post‐processed and blended), ecPoint is the most skilful. The post‐processed COSMO ensemble adds most value to summer convective events in the evening, when the global model has an underprediction bias. In two typical heavy rainfall case studies we observed underestimation of the largest point totals in the raw ECMWF ensemble, and overestimation in the raw COSMO ensemble. However, ecPoint elevated the ECMWF maxima and highlighted best the most affected areas and merged products seemed to be the most skilful of all. Even though our LAM post‐processing does not include (or arguably need) bias‐correction, this study still provides a unique blueprint for successfully combining ensemble rainfall forecasts from global and LAM systems around the world. It also has important implications for forecast products as global ensembles move ever closer to having convection‐permitting resolution.","PeriodicalId":49646,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4753","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Flash flooding is a significant societal problem, but related precipitation forecasts are often poor. To address, one can try to use output from convection‐parametrising (global) ensembles, post‐processed to forecast at point‐scale, or convection‐resolving limited area ensembles. The new methodology described here combines both. We apply “ecPoint‐rainfall” post‐processing to the ECMWF global ensemble. Alongside we use 2.2 km COSMO LAM ensemble output (centred on Italy), and also post‐process that, using a scale‐selective neighbourhood approach to compensate for insufficient members and to preserve consistently forecast local details. The two resulting scale‐compatible components then undergo lead‐time‐weighted blending, to create the final probabilistic 6 h rainfall forecasts. Product creation for forecasters, in this way, constituted the “Italy Flash Flood use case” within the EU‐funded MISTRAL project; real‐time delivery of open access products is ongoing. One year of verification shows that, of the five components (2 raw, 2 post‐processed and blended), ecPoint is the most skilful. The post‐processed COSMO ensemble adds most value to summer convective events in the evening, when the global model has an underprediction bias. In two typical heavy rainfall case studies we observed underestimation of the largest point totals in the raw ECMWF ensemble, and overestimation in the raw COSMO ensemble. However, ecPoint elevated the ECMWF maxima and highlighted best the most affected areas and merged products seemed to be the most skilful of all. Even though our LAM post‐processing does not include (or arguably need) bias‐correction, this study still provides a unique blueprint for successfully combining ensemble rainfall forecasts from global and LAM systems around the world. It also has important implications for forecast products as global ensembles move ever closer to having convection‐permitting resolution.
期刊介绍:
The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society is a journal published by the Royal Meteorological Society. It aims to communicate and document new research in the atmospheric sciences and related fields. The journal is considered one of the leading publications in meteorology worldwide. It accepts articles, comprehensive review articles, and comments on published papers. It is published eight times a year, with additional special issues.
The Quarterly Journal has a wide readership of scientists in the atmospheric and related fields. It is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Advanced Polymers Abstracts, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, CABDirect, COMPENDEX, CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts, Earthquake Engineering Abstracts, Engineered Materials Abstracts, Science Citation Index, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and more.