Environmental controls on the interannual variability in chlorophyll and phytoplankton community structure within the seasonal sub surface chlorophyll maximum in the western English channel
Michelle L. Barnett, Alan E.S. Kemp, Anna E. Hickman, Duncan A. Purdie
{"title":"Environmental controls on the interannual variability in chlorophyll and phytoplankton community structure within the seasonal sub surface chlorophyll maximum in the western English channel","authors":"Michelle L. Barnett, Alan E.S. Kemp, Anna E. Hickman, Duncan A. Purdie","doi":"10.1016/j.csr.2024.105253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The subsurface chlorophyll maximum (SCM) is increasingly recognised as an important but understudied locus of primary production particularly in shelf seas. Here we report the results of a 4 year, repeat station, summer sampling programme (2013–2016) of a seasonally recurrent SCM in the Western English Channel. Interannual variability in phytoplankton community structure and chlorophyll distribution and intensity was strongly related to water column stability at the depth interval of the SCM and also to water temperature. The phytoplankton community was statistically distinct in each year. High stability, as evidenced by large Richardson numbers and a well-developed strong thermocline appeared to favour the growth of larger dinoflagellates (autotrophs or mixotrophs) and diatoms. Such conditions led to development of the most intense SCMs and these were sometimes dominated by a single or a few key species most prominently in 2015 with near monospecific concentrations of the dinoflagellate <em>Tripos fusus</em> with average peak SCM chlorophyll concentrations of 7.3 ± 4.4 μg l<sup>−1</sup>. By contrast, in years with low water column stability and intermittent turbulence at the thermocline (2014, 2016) there was greater chlorophyll dispersal and less intense SCM. In these low stability conditions, red fluorescent nano-phytoplankton, such as naked dinoflagellates, chlorophytes and prymnesiophytes, made a greater contribution to the community, possibly as a result of the advantages that motility and enhanced light utilisation efficiency confer within an SCM exposed to turbulence. It is also likely that turbulence disrupted the stability required by the larger dinoflagellates and diatoms. Several of the key SCM taxa were absent from surface waters including the dinoflagellates <em>Tripos fusus</em>, <em>Tripos lineatus</em>, and most of the <em>Rhizosolenia</em>/<em>Proboscia</em> diatoms, consistent with adaptations more suited to survival at depth in stratified waters. These traits include luxury nutrient uptake and storage and survival in low light (both groups) and mixotrophy (dinoflagellates). On the other hand, in 2013, diatoms including <em>Pseudo-nitzschia</em> spp. were abundant in both surface, SCM and bottom waters. The relatively cooler waters (11.6–12.1 °C on average in 2013 and 2016) were characterised by smaller diatoms (<em>Chaetoceros</em> spp. and <em>Pseudo-nitzschia spp.</em>) whereas the warmer waters (13.1 °C on average in 2014) contained larger diatoms (large <em>Rhizosolenia</em> spp., <em>Lauderia annulata</em> and <em>Leptocylindrus danicus</em>). There did not appear to be continuity of key species between years, other than for the dinoflagellate <em>Tripos lineatus</em>, which was significant in both 2013 and 2014 and present in 2015. In any given year, there was no correspondence between the key spring bloom phytoplankton species as monitored in the nearby Western Channel Observatory L4 station and the key SCM taxa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50618,"journal":{"name":"Continental Shelf Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278434324000839/pdfft?md5=f725108532b0c6cde9ee4ae8a9ca642b&pid=1-s2.0-S0278434324000839-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continental Shelf Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278434324000839","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The subsurface chlorophyll maximum (SCM) is increasingly recognised as an important but understudied locus of primary production particularly in shelf seas. Here we report the results of a 4 year, repeat station, summer sampling programme (2013–2016) of a seasonally recurrent SCM in the Western English Channel. Interannual variability in phytoplankton community structure and chlorophyll distribution and intensity was strongly related to water column stability at the depth interval of the SCM and also to water temperature. The phytoplankton community was statistically distinct in each year. High stability, as evidenced by large Richardson numbers and a well-developed strong thermocline appeared to favour the growth of larger dinoflagellates (autotrophs or mixotrophs) and diatoms. Such conditions led to development of the most intense SCMs and these were sometimes dominated by a single or a few key species most prominently in 2015 with near monospecific concentrations of the dinoflagellate Tripos fusus with average peak SCM chlorophyll concentrations of 7.3 ± 4.4 μg l−1. By contrast, in years with low water column stability and intermittent turbulence at the thermocline (2014, 2016) there was greater chlorophyll dispersal and less intense SCM. In these low stability conditions, red fluorescent nano-phytoplankton, such as naked dinoflagellates, chlorophytes and prymnesiophytes, made a greater contribution to the community, possibly as a result of the advantages that motility and enhanced light utilisation efficiency confer within an SCM exposed to turbulence. It is also likely that turbulence disrupted the stability required by the larger dinoflagellates and diatoms. Several of the key SCM taxa were absent from surface waters including the dinoflagellates Tripos fusus, Tripos lineatus, and most of the Rhizosolenia/Proboscia diatoms, consistent with adaptations more suited to survival at depth in stratified waters. These traits include luxury nutrient uptake and storage and survival in low light (both groups) and mixotrophy (dinoflagellates). On the other hand, in 2013, diatoms including Pseudo-nitzschia spp. were abundant in both surface, SCM and bottom waters. The relatively cooler waters (11.6–12.1 °C on average in 2013 and 2016) were characterised by smaller diatoms (Chaetoceros spp. and Pseudo-nitzschia spp.) whereas the warmer waters (13.1 °C on average in 2014) contained larger diatoms (large Rhizosolenia spp., Lauderia annulata and Leptocylindrus danicus). There did not appear to be continuity of key species between years, other than for the dinoflagellate Tripos lineatus, which was significant in both 2013 and 2014 and present in 2015. In any given year, there was no correspondence between the key spring bloom phytoplankton species as monitored in the nearby Western Channel Observatory L4 station and the key SCM taxa.
期刊介绍:
Continental Shelf Research publishes articles dealing with the biological, chemical, geological and physical oceanography of the shallow marine environment, from coastal and estuarine waters out to the shelf break. The continental shelf is a critical environment within the land-ocean continuum, and many processes, functions and problems in the continental shelf are driven by terrestrial inputs transported through the rivers and estuaries to the coastal and continental shelf areas. Manuscripts that deal with these topics must make a clear link to the continental shelf. Examples of research areas include:
Physical sedimentology and geomorphology
Geochemistry of the coastal ocean (inorganic and organic)
Marine environment and anthropogenic effects
Interaction of physical dynamics with natural and manmade shoreline features
Benthic, phytoplankton and zooplankton ecology
Coastal water and sediment quality, and ecosystem health
Benthic-pelagic coupling (physical and biogeochemical)
Interactions between physical dynamics (waves, currents, mixing, etc.) and biogeochemical cycles
Estuarine, coastal and shelf sea modelling and process studies.