Claire Verrall , Eileen Willis , Alexander Gerrie , James Thompson
{"title":"Missed care or missed opportunities in general practice nursing","authors":"Claire Verrall , Eileen Willis , Alexander Gerrie , James Thompson","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Research into missed care has been conducted in various acute and some community healthcare settings; however, the experiences of general practice nurses (GPNs) are poorly represented in the literature.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To explore the role of the GPN and whether care activities are missed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A qualitative descriptive design was used, employing semistructured interviews with 10 participants. The participants were GPNs working in a metropolitan or regional general practice in Australia, with a minimum of three years of experience in the role. A six-step process for thematic analysis was utilised for the extraction and presentation of findings.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>GPNs rarely miss care; it is either delayed or rescheduled. Findings illustrate missed opportunities to provide care and enhance the role of the GPN. Factors contributing to missed opportunity are as follows: (i) difficulties navigating the GPN–general practitioner (GP) relationship, (ii) GPNs lack ongoing education commensurate with their scope of practice, (iii) Medicare policy fails to fund the GPN role, (iv) a rise in the number of salaried GPs leads to time pressures that limit the GPN role, (v) scope of practice constrained by time deficits, and (vi) communication problems within a siloed healthcare system limit GPN scope of practice.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The initial aim was to identify missed care; however, findings suggest that GPNs rarely miss care, but they do miss opportunities to provide care and practice to their full scope.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Internal and external factors specific to the general practice context can contribute to missed opportunities for the work of the GPN.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"31 4","pages":"Pages 188-194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000167/pdfft?md5=644daceec282e15bc701f9407250b2ec&pid=1-s2.0-S1322769624000167-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Research into missed care has been conducted in various acute and some community healthcare settings; however, the experiences of general practice nurses (GPNs) are poorly represented in the literature.
Aim
To explore the role of the GPN and whether care activities are missed.
Methods
A qualitative descriptive design was used, employing semistructured interviews with 10 participants. The participants were GPNs working in a metropolitan or regional general practice in Australia, with a minimum of three years of experience in the role. A six-step process for thematic analysis was utilised for the extraction and presentation of findings.
Findings
GPNs rarely miss care; it is either delayed or rescheduled. Findings illustrate missed opportunities to provide care and enhance the role of the GPN. Factors contributing to missed opportunity are as follows: (i) difficulties navigating the GPN–general practitioner (GP) relationship, (ii) GPNs lack ongoing education commensurate with their scope of practice, (iii) Medicare policy fails to fund the GPN role, (iv) a rise in the number of salaried GPs leads to time pressures that limit the GPN role, (v) scope of practice constrained by time deficits, and (vi) communication problems within a siloed healthcare system limit GPN scope of practice.
Discussion
The initial aim was to identify missed care; however, findings suggest that GPNs rarely miss care, but they do miss opportunities to provide care and practice to their full scope.
Conclusion
Internal and external factors specific to the general practice context can contribute to missed opportunities for the work of the GPN.
期刊介绍:
Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN).
The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues.
Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor.
The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription.
ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.