D.C.A. Moraes , P.C. Gauger , O.H. Osemeke , I.F. Machado , G.A. Cezar , R.C. Paiva , M. Mil-Homens , M.N. Almeida , A. Ramirez , G.S. Silva , D.C.L. Linhares
{"title":"Assessment of individual and population-based sampling for detection of Influenza A virus RNA in breeding swine herds","authors":"D.C.A. Moraes , P.C. Gauger , O.H. Osemeke , I.F. Machado , G.A. Cezar , R.C. Paiva , M. Mil-Homens , M.N. Almeida , A. Ramirez , G.S. Silva , D.C.L. Linhares","doi":"10.1016/j.sctalk.2024.100362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study compared the probability of influenza A virus (IAV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) detection between selected individual and population-based samples in breeding herds. A 3500-sow breeding herd was sampled for matched sets (<em>n</em> = 57) of family oral fluids (FOF), udder wipes, sow nasal wipes, individual piglet nasal wipes, and drinker wipes and tested by reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-rtPCR) for IAV RNA detection. Overall, 57.9% (33/57) of FOF samples, 49.1% (28/57) of udder wipes, 28.1% (16/57) of sow nasal wipes, 15.8% (9/57) of drinker wipes and 66.6% (38/57) of the individual piglet nasal wipes tested positive for IAV RNA. FOF had a kappa value of 0.81, a near-perfect agreement compared to individual piglet nasal wipes. Udder wipes revealed a kappa value of 0.65, a substantial agreement with individual piglet nasal wipes. The other sample types had a fair agreement with individual piglet nasal wipes (kappa values <0.28). These results validate FOF as an efficient alternative population-based sample type for IAV surveillance in the breeding herd. The proportion of positive piglets within litter by room A had 91% positivity (20/22), room B had 70% (17/24), and room C had 9% (1/11) positivity. The findings also highlight the importance of testing different farrowing rooms in the same breeding herd to strengthen IAV surveillance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101148,"journal":{"name":"Science Talks","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772569324000707/pdfft?md5=2337efe968250bfc5a91e56f8b23c71f&pid=1-s2.0-S2772569324000707-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Talks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772569324000707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study compared the probability of influenza A virus (IAV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) detection between selected individual and population-based samples in breeding herds. A 3500-sow breeding herd was sampled for matched sets (n = 57) of family oral fluids (FOF), udder wipes, sow nasal wipes, individual piglet nasal wipes, and drinker wipes and tested by reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-rtPCR) for IAV RNA detection. Overall, 57.9% (33/57) of FOF samples, 49.1% (28/57) of udder wipes, 28.1% (16/57) of sow nasal wipes, 15.8% (9/57) of drinker wipes and 66.6% (38/57) of the individual piglet nasal wipes tested positive for IAV RNA. FOF had a kappa value of 0.81, a near-perfect agreement compared to individual piglet nasal wipes. Udder wipes revealed a kappa value of 0.65, a substantial agreement with individual piglet nasal wipes. The other sample types had a fair agreement with individual piglet nasal wipes (kappa values <0.28). These results validate FOF as an efficient alternative population-based sample type for IAV surveillance in the breeding herd. The proportion of positive piglets within litter by room A had 91% positivity (20/22), room B had 70% (17/24), and room C had 9% (1/11) positivity. The findings also highlight the importance of testing different farrowing rooms in the same breeding herd to strengthen IAV surveillance.