Assessment of individual and population-based sampling for detection of Influenza A virus RNA in breeding swine herds

D.C.A. Moraes , P.C. Gauger , O.H. Osemeke , I.F. Machado , G.A. Cezar , R.C. Paiva , M. Mil-Homens , M.N. Almeida , A. Ramirez , G.S. Silva , D.C.L. Linhares
{"title":"Assessment of individual and population-based sampling for detection of Influenza A virus RNA in breeding swine herds","authors":"D.C.A. Moraes ,&nbsp;P.C. Gauger ,&nbsp;O.H. Osemeke ,&nbsp;I.F. Machado ,&nbsp;G.A. Cezar ,&nbsp;R.C. Paiva ,&nbsp;M. Mil-Homens ,&nbsp;M.N. Almeida ,&nbsp;A. Ramirez ,&nbsp;G.S. Silva ,&nbsp;D.C.L. Linhares","doi":"10.1016/j.sctalk.2024.100362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study compared the probability of influenza A virus (IAV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) detection between selected individual and population-based samples in breeding herds. A 3500-sow breeding herd was sampled for matched sets (<em>n</em> = 57) of family oral fluids (FOF), udder wipes, sow nasal wipes, individual piglet nasal wipes, and drinker wipes and tested by reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-rtPCR) for IAV RNA detection. Overall, 57.9% (33/57) of FOF samples, 49.1% (28/57) of udder wipes, 28.1% (16/57) of sow nasal wipes, 15.8% (9/57) of drinker wipes and 66.6% (38/57) of the individual piglet nasal wipes tested positive for IAV RNA. FOF had a kappa value of 0.81, a near-perfect agreement compared to individual piglet nasal wipes. Udder wipes revealed a kappa value of 0.65, a substantial agreement with individual piglet nasal wipes. The other sample types had a fair agreement with individual piglet nasal wipes (kappa values &lt;0.28). These results validate FOF as an efficient alternative population-based sample type for IAV surveillance in the breeding herd. The proportion of positive piglets within litter by room A had 91% positivity (20/22), room B had 70% (17/24), and room C had 9% (1/11) positivity. The findings also highlight the importance of testing different farrowing rooms in the same breeding herd to strengthen IAV surveillance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101148,"journal":{"name":"Science Talks","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772569324000707/pdfft?md5=2337efe968250bfc5a91e56f8b23c71f&pid=1-s2.0-S2772569324000707-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Talks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772569324000707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared the probability of influenza A virus (IAV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) detection between selected individual and population-based samples in breeding herds. A 3500-sow breeding herd was sampled for matched sets (n = 57) of family oral fluids (FOF), udder wipes, sow nasal wipes, individual piglet nasal wipes, and drinker wipes and tested by reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-rtPCR) for IAV RNA detection. Overall, 57.9% (33/57) of FOF samples, 49.1% (28/57) of udder wipes, 28.1% (16/57) of sow nasal wipes, 15.8% (9/57) of drinker wipes and 66.6% (38/57) of the individual piglet nasal wipes tested positive for IAV RNA. FOF had a kappa value of 0.81, a near-perfect agreement compared to individual piglet nasal wipes. Udder wipes revealed a kappa value of 0.65, a substantial agreement with individual piglet nasal wipes. The other sample types had a fair agreement with individual piglet nasal wipes (kappa values <0.28). These results validate FOF as an efficient alternative population-based sample type for IAV surveillance in the breeding herd. The proportion of positive piglets within litter by room A had 91% positivity (20/22), room B had 70% (17/24), and room C had 9% (1/11) positivity. The findings also highlight the importance of testing different farrowing rooms in the same breeding herd to strengthen IAV surveillance.

在种猪群中检测甲型流感病毒 RNA 的个体和群体采样评估
本研究比较了种猪群中所选个体样本与群体样本之间检测到甲型流感病毒(IAV)核糖核酸(RNA)的概率。对一个 3500 头母猪的种猪群进行了家庭口腔液 (FOF)、乳房擦拭物、母猪鼻腔擦拭物、个体仔猪鼻腔擦拭物和饮水器擦拭物的配对采样(n = 57),并通过反转录实时聚合酶链反应 (RT-rtPCR) 检测 IAV RNA。总体而言,57.9%(33/57)的 FOF 样品、49.1%(28/57)的乳房擦拭物、28.1%(16/57)的母猪鼻腔擦拭物、15.8%(9/57)的饮水器擦拭物和 66.6%(38/57)的仔猪个体鼻腔擦拭物的 IAV RNA 检测呈阳性。FOF 的 kappa 值为 0.81,与单个仔猪鼻拭子相比几乎完全一致。乳头擦拭样本的卡帕值为 0.65,与单个仔猪鼻腔擦拭样本的卡帕值基本一致。其他样本类型与单个仔猪鼻抹布的一致性一般(kappa 值为 0.28)。这些结果验证了 FOF 是在种猪群中进行 IAV 监测的一种有效的替代群体样本类型。A 室的阳性仔猪比例为 91%(20/22),B 室为 70%(17/24),C 室为 9%(1/11)。研究结果还强调了对同一种猪群中不同产房进行检测以加强 IAV 监控的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信